BoosterDuck
Banned
they're doing that shit today and not when Trump took a vacation on his first day in office
Angry right wingers are burning their MAGA hats:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...dc9e4b0edff971ac966?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Dont know why but I feel really sad for that guy who bought a MAGA fleece.
they're doing that shit today and not when Trump took a vacation on his first day in office
The precedent is set, you now need a senate majority to get a supreme court justice. This is the future McConnell has forced the country to abide by. If they take the majority in 2018, the Democrats will absolutely follow the same path.
I'm not sure a worse majority leader could have ever been picked. He shredded the integrity of the senate, and destroyed its reputation.
Kennedy actually wants to retire under a Republican. 2019 is my guess. He doesn't want to retire in an election year.
Kennedy may retire, but do you honestly think it will be because he views Trump as a Republican? He's the current moderate darling of the SC.
Abortion I'm guessing.
He'd rather retire under Trump than wait for a democrat to come in and replace him with someone pro-choice.
Dont know why but I feel really sad for that guy who bought a MAGA fleece.
Abortion I'm guessing.
He'd rather retire under Trump than wait for a democrat to come in and replace him with someone pro-choice.
Those are all good..
I would include Sherrod Brown in that group maybe.
Like I said ... he could very well retire. I have no clue. But why didn't he do that this year, then? Simply because of the redistricting case? He seems to care a lot about Gay rights too, which will absolutely come under fire if he's replaced by someone further right than him.
Maybe this year was a "feeler" year to see how insane this mother fucker is?
Maybe I'm just being hopeful. lol
This is an odd take considering Kennedy is viewed as the one stopping Roe from being overturned.
McConnell asked CBO to rush estimate for Graham-Cassidy repeal bill, @elwasson reports. Shortly after, @SpeakerRyan threw his support in.
I'm just saying that because he specifically stated when he was under Obama he'd refuse to retire under him because of his views on abortion
Paul, Murkowski, Collins still a no.
Their deadline is so fucking tight though, this is literally down to the wire. 2 weeks time and the house is in session for a total of 4 of those days.
Paul, Murkowski, Collins still a no.
Their deadline is so fucking tight though, this is literally down to the wire. 2 weeks time and the house is in session for a total of 4 of those days.
I disagree, be worried.
I don't believe a single thing Rand says, which is the worrying part here with McCain signing on.
What does worrying actually do to make stuff better?
Theoretically it might motivate you to call your senator and tell others to do so.
Technically speaking ... Wouldn't McCain be against this if they try to ram it through with the same tactics? You know, like not bringing it up for debate and not opening it up for amendments? It's not like he hated the last Skinny Repeal bill, just the traditional processes that were abandoned along the way.
McCain said he was for if it went through proper hearings and committees. So he _should_ be against this, but who knows.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Another attack in London by a loser terrorist.These are sick and demented people who were in the sights of Scotland Yard. Must be proactive!
Asked about the tweet, British Prime Minister Theresa said, I never think its helpful for anybody to speculate on what is an ongoing investigation.
Did the President share information that he was not supposed to? If not, why was he speculating? a reporter asked McMaster at a press briefing Friday.
I think what the President was communicating is that, obviously, all of our law enforcement efforts are focused on this terrorist threat, for years, McMaster said. Scotland Yard has been a leader, as our FBI has been a leader.
So, I think if there was a terrorist attack here, god forbid, that we would say that they were in the sights of the FBI, he said. So I think didnt mean anything beyond that.
So Sanders broke the law when she suggested the ESPN anchor be fired?
And I guess Trump is too? lol
It does say it applies to the President, VP, and employees of executive branch as defined by section 2105 of title 5 (which I didn't check).
Im sure the proper oversight committee will get right on it.
Im sure the proper oversight committee will get right on it.
DoJ, that is criminal code
Man Gillibrand is a scarily competent politician.
That spin on PSA about her past positions on immigration was whooo boy.
Good luck keeping your dignity working for Trump.What an absolutely pathetic spin attempt.
I'm still flabbergasted they're trying to push this through. This is a no-win situation for republicans at this point.
Option 1: They fail to get it done in time/pass it/get it past Byrd rules/etc. Some of their base hates them, but most are fine because like 80% of Americans hated their last bill, and this is just as bad if not worse if you look at the list I posted yesterday.
Option 2: They cram the bill through in time, pass it, and a small portion of their base likes it but nearly everyone else hates them because it gives them worse healthcare and causes premiums to spike. It also hits people hard BEFORE the next election.
Option 3: IT comes up to a vote and McCain gives turtle the death stare and a thumbs down for not following proper senate procedure, again.
In the play about Wellstone I did we had Paul give the thumb's down when he voted No on going to war in Iraq. Biggest applause moment of the show, every night.Option 3: IT comes up to a vote and McCain gives turtle the death stare and a thumbs down for not following proper senate procedure, again.