• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT6| Made this thread during Harvey because the ratings would be higher

Status
Not open for further replies.

studyguy

Member
We're going to seep though this shooting with 0 gun control repercussions just like Sandy Hook. It's not going to be resistance, it's just going to be pure inaction. A school of kids getting mowed down is as shocking as a concert full of people and we did squat then.
 
I could see Vegas banning firearms in all of vegas

I don't think this would be Constitutional at all. The Constitution doesn't care that your city is Las Vegas and full of mostly hotels and casinos.

The casinos could ban fire arms, though. I'd be kind of shocked if that wasn't already the case, though. Guns + Gambling + Drinking sounds like a pretty poor combination.
 

Wilsongt

Member
White guy kills people with guns: Whoa whoa. It's too quick to talk about gun violence right now!

Brown person does it: BAN ALL THE PEOPLE NOW
 

Pyrokai

Member
I don't think this would be Constitutional at all. The Constitution doesn't care that your city is Las Vegas and full of mostly hotels and casinos.

The casinos could ban fire arms, though. I'd be kind of shocked if that wasn't already the case, though. Guns + Gambling + Drinking sounds like a pretty poor combination.

Doesn't NYC ban firearms?
 
White guy kills people with guns: Whoa whoa. It's too quick to talk about gun violence right now!

Brown person does it: BAN ALL THE PEOPLE NOW

I mean we are talking about a country where cocaine wasn't removed from Coca Cola for a moral reason, but because it became cheap enough for even black people could afford them, causing the public to pressure Coca Cola to remove it because blacks might rape their white women
 
I mean we are talking about a country where cocaine wasn't removed from Coca Cola for a moral reason, but because it became cheap enough for even black people could afford them, causing the public to pressure Coca Cola to remove it because blacks might ra0e their white women

At the time cocaine was not illegal and I think it was not viewed as immoral. I read the pope was on cocaine in that period, as it was mixed with wine he drank.

Coca-cola was originally not a sugary drink, but a wine that because of prohibition was changed.

You're right about the reason they changed though, being racism.
 
At the time cocaine was not illegal and I think it was not viewed as immoral. I read the pope was on cocaine in that period, as it was mixed with wine he drank.

Coca-cola was originally not a sugary drink, but a wine that because of prohibition was changed.

You're right about the reason they changed though, being racism.
i

I'm aware of this, but enough time has past that we can say morality was the reason.
 
Thoughts and prayers.

Thoughts and prayers.

Because it is always too soon to have a national conversation about gun violence, Nazis, and racism as long as it involves white people being the perpetrators.

They're scared of having to confront their own privilege in the face of the lives lost to keep it.
 

studyguy

Member
SHS literally pulling a 'What about Chicago' in a presser as a push back against gun legislation after 500 people were shot in a single night.

I don't think shouting BUT CHICAGO counts here.
We're talking about Nevada who even if you want to take other angles of mental disorders were bussing mental patients out of the state in masse as far back as 2012.
 
Never.

Sandy Hook was when the Republican Party collectively decided that no shooting could ever be bad enough to make them supportive of any kind of gun control, no matter how meager or fucking obvious it may be.
I hate to agree with this, but yes, it is true.
 
I don't think this would be Constitutional at all. The Constitution doesn't care that your city is Las Vegas and full of mostly hotels and casinos.

The casinos could ban fire arms, though. I'd be kind of shocked if that wasn't already the case, though. Guns + Gambling + Drinking sounds like a pretty poor combination.

Vegas specifically has issues in that unlike most hotels, their resorts have 10 restaurants, 20 shops and a huge casino in each location too. How many people walk freely in and out of these vegas hotels on the strip? Controlling this seems like a nightmare. Holidays? Nah ... not even remotely possible. The strip is arm to arm for new years.
 

Blader

Member
I hate to agree with this, but yes, it is true.

The acceptance that nothing is going to be done to make this situation better because there is a bloc of people in our government committed to preventing any change from happening is a big part of what has made me so numb to these shootings.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Poor Puerto Rico...

Not to take anything away from those killed or injured in Las Vegas, but PR was finally getting the media attention they needed.

:(

Let's hope the last several days were enough to start things in a better direction.
 
The acceptance that nothing is going to be done to make this situation better because there is a bloc of people in our government committed to preventing any change from happening is a big part of what has made me so numb to these shootings.

tbf, most good gun control laws that could be passed are not constitutional.

Gun confiscation is the only great gun control law and that's obviously not constitutional.

Gun confiscation of domestic abusers would be good and I think everyone other than Thomas would agree it's constitutional (maybe Thomas, Gorsuch, and Alito would disagree at worst) though.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
So basically Manafort was a sleeper agent, and Trump welcomed his “connections”?

Why do I feel like Manafort played dumb in the adoptions meeting and could have gone over that guys head lol
 

AndyD

aka andydumi
tbf, most good gun control laws that could be passed are not constitutional.

Gun confiscation is the only great gun control law and that's obviously not constitutional.

Gun confiscation of domestic abusers would be good and I think everyone other than Thomas would agree it's constitutional (maybe Thomas, Gorsuch, and Alito would disagree at worst) though.

There can be a lot around transaction control that most people would see as fine. Background checks, gun registries, removal for elderly, mental health and disabled...
 

Blader

Member
tbf, most good gun control laws that could be passed are not constitutional.

Gun confiscation is the only great gun control law and that's obviously not constitutional.

Gun confiscation of domestic abusers would be good and I think everyone other than Thomas would agree it's constitutional (maybe Thomas, Gorsuch, and Alito would disagree at worst) though.

Rather than confiscating guns from domestic abusers, they should be unable to legally buy them anywhere in the first place.

Other civilized countries have been able to prevent sporadic outbreaks of mass gun violence without unilaterally confiscating weapons. Mandatory background checks and a national registry is basically all I'm looking for. A buyback program would be cool too.
 

pigeon

Banned
Rather than confiscating guns from domestic abusers, they should be unable to legally buy them anywhere in the first place.

Other civilized countries have been able to prevent sporadic outbreaks of mass gun violence without unilaterally confiscating weapons. Mandatory background checks, a national registry, and a buyback program is basically all I'm looking for.

The point is that they might have purchased guns before engaging in domestic abuse. They need to be taken away.
 

Wilsongt

Member
SHS literally pulling a 'What about Chicago' in a presser as a push back against gun legislation after 500 people were shot in a single night.

I don't think shouting BUT CHICAGO counts here.
We're talking about Nevada who even if you want to take other angles of mental disorders were bussing mental patients out of the state in masse as far back as 2012.

Yeah, but black people are totally killing each other, bro. Who cares about what a white guy does?
 

AndyD

aka andydumi
The point is that they might have purchased guns before engaging in domestic abuse. They need to be taken away.
I think the other approach allows for those who have them to be grandfathered in. Over time it becomes effective without the pr of taking guns away.
 

pigeon

Banned
I think the other approach allows for those who have them to be grandfathered in. Over time it becomes effective without the pr of taking guns away.

Domestic abusers commit mass shootings. Why would you want to grandfather them in? The whole point is to make sure they don't have guns!
 

Blader

Member
The point is that they might have purchased guns before engaging in domestic abuse. They need to be taken away.

Well yes, gun confiscation is more effective than anything else. But I'm looking for the doable middle ground between something that won't happen and nothing happening at all.

Doable being relative, of course, since literally nothing on gun control is doable with this Congress or administration or Republican Party.
 

chadskin

Member
More oppo just droppo
Associates of President Trump and his company have turned over documents to federal investigators that reveal two previously unreported contacts from Russia during the 2016 campaign, according to people familiar with the matter.

In one case, Trump’s personal attorney and a business associate exchanged emails weeks before the Republican National Convention about traveling to an economic conference in Russia that would be attended by top Russian financial and government leaders, including President Vladi­mir Putin, according to people familiar with the correspondence.

In the other case, the same Trump attorney, Michael Cohen, received a proposal in late 2015 for a Moscow residential project from a company founded by a billionaire who once served in the Russian Senate, these people said. The previously unreported inquiry marks the second proposal for a Trump-branded Moscow project that was delivered to the company during the presidential campaign and has since come to light.

Cohen declined the invitation to the economic conference, citing the difficulty of attending so close to the GOP convention, according to people familiar with the matter. And Cohen rejected the Moscow building plan.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...91fe5e-a6c0-11e7-850e-2bdd1236be5d_story.html
 

AndyD

aka andydumi
Domestic abusers commit mass shootings. Why would you want to grandfather them in? The whole point is to make sure they don't have guns!
I agree. I mean from a realistic political implementation, one is more doable than the other.
 

pigeon

Banned
Well yes, gun confiscation is more effective than anything else. But I'm looking for the doable middle ground between something that won't happen and nothing happening at all.

Doable being relative, of course, since literally nothing on gun control is doable with this Congress or administration or Republican Party.

I agree. I mean from a realistic political implementation, one is more doable than the other.

It is so doable to ban domestic abusers from purchasing guns that, as Cybit informed me last shooting, this is already the law in most states.

It's just not sufficient to actually make a difference. They need to have their currently existing guns confiscated, and anybody who provides them with a gun that is then used in a crime needs to be tried as an accessory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom