Like the fact that F-Zero is not available on PS2. How come many of the GC/Xbox games that looked awesome could have been easily handled by PS2 according to you, and yet we never saw anything like them ? HOW SURPRISING.
lol F-zero is not a particularly complex game or with a graphic prowess
what its surprising is how you seems to be unaware of the amount of games shared on each system specially the ones that the press consider have better graphics
hitman blood money, matrix path of neo, burnout 3, area 51 and black are 5 examples of games that weren't released on GC but are in both Xbox and PS2 and all of them are considered to have awesome graphics by critics and people in game development, in the case of burnout 3 we even have an explanation of the developer about skipping the GC and that is it cant handle the vertex processing the game requires at the same speed which sounds correct as its an area the GC lacks compared to the other consoles as both PS2 and Xbox have hardware to handle vertex operations and its the third game, the others where multiplatform the first even looking better on gc over ps2 yet as each game was more complex the GC was the first that couldnt handle it
there are more games that are in both xbox and ps2 than xbox and gc considered graphically intensive, there are even games like ratatouille that look amazing in PS2 and Wii but lack in the GC which is a curious case
So you do agree that we can't conclude anything based on multiplats and ports. Why even post comparison videos in this case ?
because you said the ps2 cant handle complex graphics effects, the comparison proved that its not the case and at the same time proved GC have games with missing effects and worst textures compared to PS2, each game has its story and reasons behind the results you cant say you cant conclude things, they can be used to make conclusions granted enough knowledge of the system and techniques used but they dont imply its impossible to make better techniques to achieve more and better effects later which becomes self evident when later games improve graphics over past games, in that regard nobody can deny the ps2 was used better and better to keep competing
as I mentioned the story is already written the whole generation and its results are there for study I am not speculating I am stating facts, very old facts actually, and curiously PS2 improved its image quality as now with freemcboot the special functions of the console can be forced in games, so old games can be forced to progressive scan and even adapt the image scaling and filter better for HD LCD tv and even to FHD giving better image proving again the console was always more capable