Lonely1 said:
Is not in the same class of effort as the PSP.
A look at relative smartphone hardware doesn't determine that. That's more positive commentary on the evolution of smartphones and smartphone components than an indictment of Sony, IMO. It's not unlike the rise of PC GPUs vs custom console hardware - everyone switched to PC architectures simply because they were the best, just as everyone now uses (or will use) off-the-shelf smartphone architectures simply because that's where technical growth is being driven. Ironically, performance wise NGP compares a lot better to 'commodity hardware' than the PS3 did to the PCs of its day, at least on the GPU side...yet you apparently laud PS3 while saying NGP relatively skimps. (That, of course, is a side effect of everyone playing with the same power & cost envelopes in the mobile space - not so much in the home space, PCs and consoles have completely different budgets to deal with there).
Again, I don't know if Sony could put more performance into NGP without compromising battery life too much, or without a smaller process which won't be available til next year. Do you think they could?
Lonely1 said:
Also, the PSP had the same (and more later on) RAM than the Ps2 and launched 4 years into the PS2 life, rather than what, five of Ps3 if it launches this year?
Relative to their home systems that looks about the same to me...NGP may be arriving later in the home cycle, but this is a longer home cycle...
Anyway, this is all going OT, but suffice to say I think it's misguided to consider NGP an indication that Sony won't go with a big upgrade on the home side. Maybe they will, maybe they won't, but I don't think NGP is any indication of the latter at all.