John Kowalski
Banned
I have to set up a chrome extension that changes alt right into white supremacists, for historicity's sake
This guy doesn't seem to think so.
Gamergate is mostly made up of gullible idiots, not the alt-right.
Yes. But it quickly activated a ton of people who had zero previous interest in politics or culture wars. And it codified the tools of the alt-right, from language, to brigading, to harassment techniques, which within months spread to every single other medium from books to television, and around a year in became the most visible form of online right-wing discourse.
I don't buy it when people say GG was some isolated gaming-only thing. You're being disingenuous, or you never really followed what was happening. Three years ago, communication online looked entirely different pre-GG compared to how it does now.
Before GG, this entire style existed in the limp-dicked corners of the MRA/MGTOW/Red Pill world, completely powerless to affect the discourse. After GG, and all the mainstream coverage it got, everything changed. These people are now the loudest voice in America. GG gave them the template to achieve that.
The Tea Party was firmly engaged in dogwhistle politics. They attracted racists looking for a home, but not really much beyond the usual Southern Strategy pandering the mainstream GOP engages in.
They were also far more interested in actual policy. Unrealistic, idiotic policies, but policies nonetheless. Above all, their goal was to dismantle as much of the federal government as possible, and cut as many taxes as possible including things like the tariffs Trump supporters are so interested in.
There's overlap, sure, but I don't really think the two movements are outgrowths of the same thing. Few Republicans wanted Trump out of the picture during the primaries like Tea Partiers did. They're all about ideological purity.
I'll pm a mod about this thread as well.
Look, I've purposely been avoiding the off topic forum because I'm tired of all the politics/arguments, whatever.
Please, leave the freaking politics out of the gaming forum here. There's another forum this can be discussed in.
I'll pm a mod about this thread as well.
Look, I've purposely been avoiding the off topic forum because I'm tired of all the politics/arguments, whatever.
Please, leave the freaking politics out of the gaming forum here. There's another forum this can be discussed in.
Why? It's just criticism. Other people are free to disagree and say why they think otherwise (I have in the past to the extent that I disagree with some of the narrative from cultural studies that she presupposes). According to your logic what you're saying has a chilling effect on speech.
Not to speak for the mods, but I don't think you'll be successful in the endeavour to get all political threads closed. There are plenty of threads for you to read which I'm sure will steer clear of political talk, but this is important stuff that many of us wish to discuss, specifically in the context of games and how things like Gamergate played their part.
I know I am going to probably get a lot of hate for this. I am a libertarian, and while I voted for Hillary Clinton, and tend to support Democrats moreso than Republicans, I am somewhat optimistic that some good will probably come out of a Trump administration.
To be clear, I do not support the harassment of anyone. That being said, I believe that Sarkeesian's actions have had a clear and dangerous chilling effect on the constitutional right to freedom of speech. As I have said before in response to defenders of censorship in games. If you do not like the content in a game. Don't buy it. Speak with your wallet, and allow others to do the same. Money should ultimately determine what content is in videogames.
That's some of it. But probably a rather large portion of them just don't care in a motivated way. The struggle so to speak doesn't intersect with their lives in a very tangible way. Scarcity, difference, and distance can dissuade strong empathy responses. As an example, I don't think when someone goes in and buys a pair of 50 dollar shoes at Walmart that they're thinking to themselves "Fuck those kids in Malaysia" despite the terrible work conditions.
Any political thread that involves gaming should be here. Should we have a thread discussing Papers, Please go in to Off-topic?Thanks for the kind reply. I understand your point as well. My fear is that the thread may lead to other political threads creeping up in here but that's what the mods are for. I'll bow out now. Cheers!
Thanks for the kind reply. I understand your point as well. My fear is that the thread may lead to other political threads creeping up in here but that's what the mods are for. I'll bow out now. Cheers!
If anything they are a symptom of the same underlying problem. But even that is a stretch.
What does this even mean?
Clinton won among young voters. Despite what your Gamergate narrative tells you, young men still vote liberal
Majority of gamers aren't young men anymore.
There is a difference between having an opinion and disagreeing with speech, and the manipulation of weaknesses in game distribution channels in order to prevent games with content one disagrees with from releasing in the western world. There are only a handful of retail stores and digital distribution channels by which a game can release. Take Dead or Alive Xtreme 3 for example. This game, while offensive to some should have had a right to exist in the United States; however, because of the chilling effect-- and we know this by admission of the game's publisher, it was not released here.
I would take this a step further and say that AO-rated games should be allowed to be released in the United States. Currently, if a game gets an AO rating, it is essentially a death sentence for the game as no store will carry it. I believe stores should have the game behind the counter and available for purchase if one wishes to purchase it, but I digress.
I understand the concerns of those who defend censorship in games; however, I tend to take an intellectual approach which defends the right to freedom of speech in all forms of media.
There is also a clear line from the release of Jazz Jackrabbit on GBA to the election of Donald Trump.
1. Jaleco releases "Jazz Jackrabbit" on GBA
2. A War Against "Political Correctness" or (PC Culture) Begins
3. Online Publication Breitbart.com and Gamergate Figurehead Milo Yiannopoulos Give
Birth to the Alt-Right Movement
4. Donald Trump Spends Much of Campaign Critiquing Political Correctness
5. The Alt-Right Chooses Donald Trump as their Champion in the Fight Against PC Culture
6. Donald Trump Chooses Breitbart Chairman Steve Bannon as Campaign CEO
7. Donald Trump is Elected President of the United States of America
8. Steve Bannon is Appointed Chief Strategist and Senior Counsoler to the President of the United States of America
9. The Alt-Right Celebrates their Victory
Pretty sure women comprise a bit over half of gamers at the moment. Though this includes mobile gaming.
If you limit it to console and (gaming?) PC gaming, i would guess men are the majority.
I imagine the arbitrary margin in my head becomes much more narrow when considering mobile. I still think however, that males comprise a majority of gaming. This of course is based on nothing more than my exposure to multiplayer titles, which is a tiny fraction of the entire userbase.
I think there was a study that concluded women are the majority of gamers. But don't quote me on that...
Gotta do some googling.
Majority of gamers aren't young men anymore.
I think there was a study that concluded women are the majority of gamers. But don't quote me on that...
Gotta do some googling.
Wow. That would be quite the shift from the days where gamers were looked at as nothing more than virgins in their parents' basements.
Gamergate is just a symptom of a much larger issue. Lots of young and old white men and women feel disenfranchised by the left. They are told they are stupid rednecks for disagreeing with progressives. They are called racist for supporting their party's candidate. They are mocked for their religious views. They are told they are racist for supporting police. In rural parts of the country they are seeing their wealth deteriorate and their white culture erode. I'm not defending anything about the right nor do I feel sorry for them, don't get me wrong. What I see though, is a large group of our country that is feeling left out, forgotten, and voiceless. These people showed up in droves to have their voices heard, for good or for bad. You can call them stupid and clueless and awful, but that doesn't change the fact they voted. GG didn't get Trump elected. Their is certainly a backlash against political correctness and Trump tapped into that to get elected. If progressives want to win again in 4 years they need to figure out how be less abrasive to this group.
OK, ESA's 2016 facts (PDF) http://essentialfacts.theesa.com/Essential-Facts-2016.pdf
EDIT Though it seems this is limited to the US?
GENDER
of Game Players
59% male
41% female
BUT
Women age 18 or older represent a significantly greater portion of the
game-playing population (31%) than boys age 18 or younger (17%)
So, i may have been wrong. I swear i've seen something that claimed women are the majority but i will admit i cannot be be sure. Memory is unreliable.
Will keep digging.
EDIT And if this is limited to US, my memory may be about a world-wide thing. Unsure.
Sure did. Breakin' all the rules, Trumpin' my way through life.... did you just quote yourself?
Wow. That would be quite the shift from the days where gamers were looked at as nothing more than virgins in their parents' basements.
It's more like, and I hate to be un-PC about this, old white people who are trying to hang on to the last vestiges of a society where they didn't have to compete because they were white.
They could get a factory job (and displace some last-hired, first-fired black or brown person) that paid them thirty bucks an hour to bang a wrench on a pipe for eight hours a day with no college degree, and they'd do that shit for thirty years and then get a nice pension and a gold watch.
Now, they find that their whiteness doesn't get them shit in a competitive world, so instead of bettering themselves through education and finding jobs that take actual training and learning and interaction (such as programming or health care or hell, welding if you like to be hands-on), they pitched a fit and voted for the days of banging-on-pipe-with-wrench to come back, even though they're not coming back.
The alt-right is a very small part of the Trump phenomenon here. The alt-right and the Gamergaters are more like Peter Thiel in that they want a post-democratic world where they'd obviously rule the land and have a harem of hot chicks because they would be the Mad Maxes of the New American Free-For-All.
Even these numbers are impressive enough.
Gamergate gets way too much credit on this forum. A bunch of nerds whining about games journalism didn't get trump elected.
I agree with all of thisYes. But it quickly activated a ton of people who had zero previous interest in politics or culture wars. And it codified the tools of the alt-right, from language, to brigading, to harassment techniques, which within months spread to every single other medium from books to television, and around a year in became the most visible form of online right-wing discourse.
I don't buy it when people say GG was some isolated gaming-only thing. You're being disingenuous, or you never really followed what was happening. Three years ago, communication online looked entirely different pre-GG compared to how it does now.
Before GG, this entire style existed in the limp-dicked corners of the MRA/MGTOW/Red Pill world, completely powerless to affect the discourse. After GG, and all the mainstream coverage it got, everything changed. These people are now the loudest voice in America. GG gave them the template to achieve that.
The Tea Party was firmly engaged in dogwhistle politics. They attracted racists looking for a home, but not really much beyond the usual Southern Strategy pandering the mainstream GOP engages in.
They were also far more interested in actual policy. Unrealistic, idiotic policies, but policies nonetheless. Above all, their goal was to dismantle as much of the federal government as possible, and cut as many taxes as possible including things like the tariffs Trump supporters are so interested in.
There's overlap, sure, but I don't really think the two movements are outgrowths of the same thing. Few Republicans wanted Trump out of the picture during the primaries like Tea Partiers did. They're all about ideological purity.
It's more like, and I hate to be un-PC about this, old white people who are trying to hang on to the last vestiges of a society where they didn't have to compete because they were white.
They could get a factory job (and displace some last-hired, first-fired black or brown person) that paid them thirty bucks an hour to bang a wrench on a pipe for eight hours a day with no college degree, and they'd do that shit for thirty years and then get a nice pension and a gold watch.
Now, they find that their whiteness doesn't get them shit in a competitive world, so instead of bettering themselves through education and finding jobs that take actual training and learning and interaction (such as programming or health care or hell, welding if you like to be hands-on), they pitched a fit and voted for the days of banging-on-pipe-with-wrench to come back, even though they're not coming back.
The alt-right is a very small part of the Trump phenomenon here. The alt-right and the Gamergaters are more like Peter Thiel in that they want a post-democratic world where they'd obviously rule the land and have a harem of hot chicks because they would be the Mad Maxes of the New American Free-For-All.
To be fair, the statement draws no conclusions as to these women's sexual proclivities, nor where they live.
Let's just be PC when it we decide it's cool to do it.
I actually think the rising rates of Obamacare and Hilary's lack of distinctive message or enthusiasm around her candidacy were high above old whites trying to go back to the old days. Trump should have been easily beatable.
I blame kids growing up on 4chan more than anything.
People always like to brush off any notion that it has an influence, but if your main form of communication is shit like /b or /pol of course you're going to come up with terrible views of the world.
I would take this a step further and say that AO-rated games should be allowed to be released in the United States. Currently, if a game gets an AO rating, it is essentially a death sentence for the game as no store will carry it. I believe stores should have the game behind the counter and available for purchase if one wishes to purchase it, but I digress.
I understand the concerns of those who defend censorship in games; however, I tend to take an intellectual approach which defends the right to freedom of speech in all forms of media.
There is a difference between having an opinion and disagreeing with speech, and the manipulation of weaknesses in game distribution channels in order to prevent games with content one disagrees with from releasing in the western world. There are only a handful of retail stores and digital distribution channels by which a game can release. Take Dead or Alive Xtreme 3 for example. This game, while offensive to some should have had a right to exist in the United States; however, because of the chilling effect-- and we know this by admission of the game's publisher, it was not released here.
I would take this a step further and say that AO-rated games should be allowed to be released in the United States. Currently, if a game gets an AO rating, it is essentially a death sentence for the game as no store will carry it. I believe stores should have the game behind the counter and available for purchase if one wishes to purchase it, but I digress.
I understand the concerns of those who defend censorship in games; however, I tend to take an intellectual approach which defends the right to freedom of speech in all forms of media.