Phatosaurus
Member
Ah, what about this? https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01J66BMXC/
Haven't heard anything negative about it. I was pretty tempted to get the same one but the clolour scheme of it put me off.
Ah, what about this? https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01J66BMXC/
Oh wow, I was looking for ram, but instead learned that the i7 6850K is currently priced at $360. I've been itching for 40 lanes for a few months, this may be the time.
It will work but in single channel mode which can slightly affect performance in certain situations. You'll need to have in mind that the new stick needs to be similarly specced in terms of latency and speed otherwise they might not work at all or you'll need to set them to the same frequency/latency manually.
The mounts will be the same since the socket is the same. You might not need to buy a new motherboard if you don't need new chipset features Z370 will bring, since it's very possible 8700K will be compatible with Z170 motherboards.
I don't know much about hardware and I've never built a PC before, so I chose a build that PC Part Picker has a guide on. This card they recommend is currently sold out, but this one seems similar at a glance and is the same price, but I don't know what half of these terms and specs mean. I'm just interested in virtual reality and having games run as nice as possible on a $500 budget GPU. :/
How much worse off am I if I choose the available GPU?
Whats your specs? Have you ran a memtest?Nothing like trying in vain to get a new computer to run games. So frustrating. PUBG? Black screen on startup. Witcher 3? Nothing at all. Fallout 4? Crashes in the launcher.
I'm guessing it's a RAM issue, but who knows.
There's only speculation at this point, but it is a possibility the 8700k will be compatible with Z170, since it's the same socket.
Ah, thank you for the insight! Much appreciated!The EVGA is actually clocked faster from factory, probably a bit noisier since it got two fans rather than the three that could be run slower for the same effect. But the Gigabyte equivalent to it is the $550 one. The prices are all kind of nosense at the moment, the EVGAs that should be the cheapest models are priced at $700, this is a tier above them.
Whats your specs? Have you ran a memtest?
The problem with TR is that, while a monster at multitasking, it's design introduces inherent limitations on gaming task: namely the core to core latency that you can find well explained a few post above. It even has a BIOS setting called game mode, where it changes the cache memory behavior and disables half of the threads, so you are not even-future proofing yourself for when games start to use more than 16 threads. And even though is one thread per-core, it still loses to the 1800x in some cases, which is already compromised in gaming performance when compared to Intel's. And this is without factoring OC, which is much better on Intel's atm.
Unless you require the quad-channel memory, express PCI-E lanes and the other perks of the platform, I would hold on TR for gaming and say that the 1700 is the sweet spot atm. Or go Intel if you want a "future proof" system, but I don't think that any current option can be called that, when they are not much better than a 2014 i7 5960x.
Stupid question here.
I want to remove my graphics card drivers and do a clean/fresh install.
I'm curious if I can do this with DDU if i'm using a Ryzen CPU since I know it has no onboard graphics whatsoever.
Then most likely it has nothing to do with your memory. What psu do you have? Have you installed all drivers? Most notably the graphics drivers. If so are they the newest ones from nvidia's website.Memtest came up with nothing.
Was just able to firestrike and time spy with no problems.
All stock speeds, no OC.
Ryzen 1700X
GTX 1080
16GB (2x8) Crucial 2133 RAM
Gigabyte AB350M Gaming 3 mobo
250GB Samsung 960 m.2 + some random 2TB 7200 HDD
and I'm running @ 3440x1440
Then most likely it has nothing to do with your memory. What psu do you have? Have you installed all drivers? Most notably the graphics drivers. If so are they the newest ones from nvidia's website.
Haven't heard anything negative about it. I was pretty tempted to get the same one but the clolour scheme of it put me off.
Ah, yeah it might possibly have been. Keep testing, glad you got it running.Corsair CX750M
And yeah, I've installed the latest graphics drivers and reflashed the BIOS to the latest version.
A little bit ago I got Witcher 3 to load somewhat, and I'm not exactly sure how the game opens, but it looked like there were cutscenes you could skip, which were just black screens with a "Space - skip" UI element, until the game engine loaded in and I could run around as Geralt and everything looked more-or-less fine. It was weird.
Edit: maaaaaaybe it was my audio interface? I unplugged that and PUBG loaded right up.
It was $299 at Micro Center a while back, but it was a tough get. I'm pretty sure my local store just hid theirs until it was over.
My current build:
i5 2500K
8GB RAM (not sure of the make/model)
Would a GPU suffice for now? I just started a replay of Witcher 3 on my PS4, but the idea of finally experiencing this game in 60FPS is starting to intrigue me on a GPU upgrade. I currently have an Nvidia 670.
Recommendations? I'm gaming at 1080P (though I've thought about upgrading to a larger monitor as well).
How much you willing to spend?
$200-250. I'm guessing a 1060 3GB then? Or should I go for a 6GB?
$200-250. I'm guessing a 1060 3GB then? Or should I go for a 6GB?
Will my motherboard from 2011 work with a GTX 1070? How do I know?
Here is a newegg link: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130573
It's fine. You'd need a mobo from the 90s or early 2000s to not be able to use it afaik.
If you're not in a hurry
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01GGBPYA2/
If you wanna go Gigabyte, take the G1 for £9 more than the WF3
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01GCAW1IA/
The palit is better though
Edit: the Aorus is also prety good (better than the G1)
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B071CX3W5D/
So not a Sea Hawk X or MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X?
Appreciate the help
Because go and read your CPU spec, the memory controller is rated at 2400mhz.
The ram will work at 4000mhz as long as the CPU memory controller is good enough. That's the lowest common denominator, not the ram or the mobo.
QVL can just be ignored. I've never used it in years of building. RAM is the same, the memory chips are from just a few brands and the rest of marketing/binning.
Nothing wrong with these two but the ones I listed are cheaper and do the job just fine.
And no point getting the Sea Hawk at that price, that's 1080 Ti territory.
Happy to say that my new sticks worked great! 3733mhz goodness & my 7700k @ 5.2ghz. Very pleased!
For content creators; photo and video editors and special effects peeps...
I want the g.skill RGB ram (4 sticks) but 64GB DDR4 (4x 3600mhz sticks) is fucking expensive. I'm debating if its worth it over 32GB.
It's hard for me to decide if I can justify it for my workstation. Does anyone here have experiences with workflows in both 32 and 64 gigs? How much saved time am I looking at. Particularly with the moment-to-moment ram preview workflows while editing as well as heavy computational effects like Trapcode particular.
I want to get into a bit of 3d modelling (cinema 4D) but not anything crazy.
Secondly, would a 960 SSD have great workflow benefits over a 850 SSD? A 500GB Samsung 850 Evo is considerable cheaper than a 960 Evo. I'm just looking for app speed increases I can feel. the snappier everything gets, the better.
But I've heard some people say that its only a specific niche that will benefit from 960s speed as SATA 3 is being pushed to a point where the benefits cannot be felt in many circumstances?
Thirdly, I've been looking for a good deal for a 1080 Ti. What would you consider a good deal? 600 dollars? 500? Is there any cards I should be on the lookout for?
I'm torn between the Asus STRIX which I think looks wonderful. But I see some of the other manufactures have cheaper variations on newegg.
My friend is offering me this computer for $400 and was wondering if it's a good deal.
Sapphire Vapor-X R9 280X OC
Intel Core i5-4590 3.30 ghz
8gb RAM
250gb SSD
Logitech G Pro Gaming Mouse
Corsair K70 Keyboard
Asus Z87-A motherboard
Thermal take case
Asia VE247H 23" monitor
I can't imagine a situation where simply closing the other program wouldn't solve your problems unless you are making some crazy scenes. I work heavily with cinema 4d and after effects, very rarely the ram usage in a single program would go over 18GB. When you do get close to your limit, which happens when you leave everything open, it usually asks you to close After Effects before other software. Also, the more ram you have, the bigger the cache files, and page files in windows so that can fill up your SSds if you don't purge them often..
I use a 64gb Macpro at work and the biggest benefit is that I leave everything open from 9am to 5pm, but cinema 4d is considerably faster on my home machine despite having half the ram. After effects is only faster at work because the 10GB Ethernet connection to the servers with the files and the extra cores in the Xeons. So I would recommend getting a CPU that is $300 more expensive before getting the 64 GB of ram. Build in in a way that you can add them later if you need them, however. none of them 4GB sticks in this day and age.
You wont notice any difference between those SSDs.
My suggestion for ~780AUD https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/dfmPr7
You didn't specify if you need peripherals also (monitor, keyboard etc.)?
Friend is about ready to pull the trigger on his PC Parts
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/KCZ8NN
Any changes he should make or is this fine?
Friend is about ready to pull the trigger on his PC Parts
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/KCZ8NN
Any changes he should make or is this fine?
For content creators; photo and video editors and special effects peeps...
I want the g.skill RGB ram (4 sticks) but 64GB DDR4 (4x 3600mhz sticks) is fucking expensive. I'm debating if its worth it over 32GB.
It's hard for me to decide if I can justify it for my workstation. Does anyone here have experiences with workflows in both 32 and 64 gigs? How much saved time am I looking at. Particularly with the moment-to-moment ram preview workflows while editing as well as heavy computational effects like Trapcode particular.
I want to get into a bit of 3d modelling (cinema 4D) but not anything crazy.
Secondly, would a 960 SSD have great workflow benefits over a 850 SSD? A 500GB Samsung 850 Evo is considerable cheaper than a 960 Evo. I'm just looking for app speed increases I can feel. the snappier everything gets, the better.
But I've heard some people say that its only a specific niche that will benefit from 960s speed as SATA 3 is being pushed to a point where the benefits cannot be felt in many circumstances?
Thirdly, I've been looking for a good deal for a 1080 Ti. What would you consider a good deal? 600 dollars? 500? Is there any cards I should be on the lookout for?
I'm torn between the Asus STRIX which I think looks wonderful. But I see some of the other manufactures have cheaper variations on newegg.
Yes, there are changes he should make.
1200w really not necessary unless he plans on adding another 1080Ti.
Also: 3 grand on a system but a $40 CPU cooler? That needs to be an AIO.
Lastly: $769 for the Aorus Xtreme on stupid fans or $49 more for the hybrid version? No brainer.
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod...BoS_RxVO6Vh36ebVUF0aAtzLEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
Now THAT is a system I would like to see pics of when built.
That psu, he doesn't need a 1200w psu at all, a 550w to 650w is all he needs.