8 years ago it was fashionable to be woke. Today it's fashionable to be anti woke. The boomerang effect may come in full circle by the time this game comes out.By the time this game comes out the backlash to the anti woke backlash will be in full effect. They are ironically making the same mistakes as the woke by complaining incessantly and looking for reasons to be offended.
As a Lesbian playstation fan yesAre Playstation fans all lesbians?
People just want to hate this game for no reason…
Some pictures of this actress (not this one) actually might go either way, honestly. I just don't want to play as a character like that. My time is my most valuable asset and I will not spend it on something like that.
95% of people would say this is a female.
that is true, they could still turn this around and redesign the main character. Same actress could be used, just give her an 80s style retro afro, some makeup and a few other tweaks and it would be much better.Its not too late to save the game by changing the face of the character.
Judging success is complex.So what happens if this game is critically and financially successful?
8 years ago it was fashionable to be woke. Today it's fashionable to be anti woke. The boomerang effect may come in full circle by the time this game comes out.
It's getting to the point of complaining just for the sake of complaining about wokeness. If we just have a great game with a woman lead that's bald, all the complaining may just be a loud minority by the time the game comes out.
Some of the comments here are just flat out weird. Photoshopping the character with long hair, showing other female characters with curvy hips. When playing infamous did anyone stop to think if Cole's ass was nice enough?
I think GTA 6 might be the real start of the boomerang. More and more these anti-woke guys have been coming for anything and everything even over the smallest shit. Witcher 4, huge fanbase, so the anti-woke backlash to Ciri has been getting a big counter backlash on twitter of people just being sick of them whining and being outrage tourists. If they come for GTA6, it's gonna be that x100, some of them already tried after the trailer and got laughed out of the room.8 years ago it was fashionable to be woke. Today it's fashionable to be anti woke. The boomerang effect may come in full circle by the time this game comes out.
It's getting to the point of complaining just for the sake of complaining about wokeness. If we just have a great game with a woman lead that's bald, all the complaining may just be a loud minority by the time the game comes out.
Some of the comments here are just flat out weird. Photoshopping the character with long hair, showing other female characters with curvy hips. When playing infamous did anyone stop to think if Cole's ass was nice enough?
P.S
If people dont like the characters "attitude" sure.
But saying shes ugly.
Nah fame, you are letting the mask slide off.
Not talking about the game but entirely on looks bruh she’s ugly af or we have totally different standards.
What world view. It’s a trailer with a bald woman. You people are incredibly thin skinned.Stupid posts like this where the poster thinks they can shame/bully/peer pressure people into accepting their world view are just that..... stupid. It's not going to work and we don't want this shit. ND can take this shit and shove it where the son doesn't shine. Read the room buddy.
Sony have to remove Neil Druckman as the head of Naughty Dog lest he drive the studio into the ground with his asinine decision making. You'd think coming off the controversy in TLOU2, the studio would want to reset and reconnect with their fanbase. Nope this dude is a shit stirrer that just wants the smoke and I'd hate for the talent at Naughty dog to be put at risk because of this guy. They need to bring Bruce Straley back because this shit has got to stop.
Quit pretending to be matty plays
Even A.I. cannot defend this shit.
Judging success is complex.
The game will make a lot of money because it's a Naughty Dog game. There's no doubt about it.
But what is Naughty Dog's mission?
I mean real mission, not some marketing/pr bullshit.
Naughty Dog is a key differentiator. Their mission is to draw people into the PlayStation eco system.
I don't see that with Intergalactic.
About the "critical success": both you and I, everyone in this forum in fact, knows that critical acclaim is worth shit in the year 2024. And it will be worth even less when Intergalactic gets released.
Couldn't agree more. It is way too prevalent in entertainment these days. I assume creatives think it makes their characters endearing.Snarky, too cool for school person that doesn't seem to have a care in the world that for some reason is in a situation where they will probably have to save the world/galaxy.
Your being nitpicktociousYour being facetious the game is a racing sim completely different ball game for GT to be realistic they have to have world accurate cars and brands to bring it all together seeing Porsche and adidas in a sci-fi trailer is sort of weird tbh.
I legitimately don't think people would be making such a big deal out of it she was just some kind of hardened female space marine/bounty hunter type of character. But no...we get edgy, rebellious punk snarkily drinking a....fountain drink in a spaceship. Ok.Couldn't agree more. It is way too prevalent in entertainment these days. I assume creatives think it makes their characters endearing.
Lady boy and alien like comes to mind.
Even A.I. cannot defend this shit.
I legitimately don't think people would be making such a big deal out of it she was just some kind of hardened female space marine/bounty hunter type of character. But no...we get edgy, rebellious punk snarkily drinking a....fountain drink in a spaceship. Ok.
"You're just saying Sonic is ugly because you don't want to fuck him! He is NOT ugly!"Its not too late to save the game by changing the face of the character.
Not true. Critical acclaim does still matter. It matters less than it did in 2004, but it does still matter.
The one thing we do know is Sony and ND wants to make money with this game. And they probably maybe wanting this game to be successful enough to make it into a movie or TV show at some point.
So if they sell 10 million units in the first year at an average price of $65.......that'll be $520 million in revenue. I'm assuming this game will cost at least $300 million to make. And probably have a $50 million advertisement budget. That's a great 1st year financial success.
Chris Chan has entered the chat..."You're just saying Sonic is ugly because you don't want to fuck him! He is NOT ugly!"
Already getting meme'd to death. Naughty Dog has an uphill battle with this one.
Hey shit, and female protagonist looking like a woman. What year is this from?You will never see this in a Niel Cuckman game:
God has left the chat.Chris Chan has entered the chat...
TLOU2 wasn’t meme’s for 2+ years before launch. This is a completely different beast.TLOU2 also was meme'd to death. It went on to sell over 15 million copies in 3 years.
GAF: Is this a man?
Our (the anti woke) only hope is for it to sell noticeably less than Uncharted 4 and The Last of Us. It'll be more expensive to make than both of those. If it sells 80% of what those did, maybe it makes them reconsider moving forward.So what happens if this game is critically and financially successful?
Probably being 360 degree scanned. I’ve done it too.What did I just watch?
GAF: Is this a man?
They still have to pay distributors: Amazon, Gamestop, Walmart, Best Buys, etc, I don’t know how much distributors cut is, but I bet you its around 20-25%
TLOU2 wasn’t meme’s for 2+ years before launch. This is a completely different beast.
I'm not furry, but sometimes it almost gets to a point, I'd rather make out with a hedgehog. Totally sounds like a furry, but it's like when people joke around about which you have to do - pick one or the other. Sonic or a super ugly, fat, bald chick. My furdar almost tells me to choose Sonic. lol"You're just saying Sonic is ugly because you don't want to fuck him! He is NOT ugly!"
It would be even more considering the game will be $70 plus special editions.That's only for 50% of their games. The other half is sold directly from the PlayStation store.
Plus I think that retail distributors cut is 20%. So yeah, if they can manage to sell 10 million units in year one at an average price of $65....that'll be $100 million in profit (after including marketing and paying retail distributors).
I'm not furry, but sometimes it almost gets to a point, I'd rather make out with a hedgehog. Totally sounds like a furry, but it's like when people joke around about which you have to do - pick one or the other. Sonic or a super ugly, fat, bald chick. My furdar almost tells me to choose Sonic. lol
I'm not a big fan of the brands being present in the game, but looking at it from a Blade Runner perspective, it's a much easier pill for me to swallow. Seeing Atari, TDK, Coca-Cola etc. was cool in Blade Runner, it really grounded the Cyberpunk aesthetic, I hope they can achieve the same in Intergalactic.The brands don't strike me as product placement, as in for the sake of sneaking in an ad. They are very conspicuous, and in the case of the Porsche, incongruous. It's more like the way brands are used in death stranding. Well, maybe not exactly that. Maybe more like blade runner.
Our (the anti woke) only hope is for it to sell noticeably less than Uncharted 4 and The Last of Us. It'll be more expensive to make than both of those. If it sells 80% of what those did, maybe it makes them reconsider moving forward.
It would be even more considering the game will be $70 plus special editions.
Again:- Uncharted 4 sold 16 million units after 3 years.
- TLOU sold 8 million copies after 1 year.
-TLOU sold 17 million copies after 5 years.
So if Intergalactic sells 15 million in 3 years, it's an obvious huge success to you financially right?