I liked her singing voice in Barenaked Ladies.
now THATS funny
I liked her singing voice in Barenaked Ladies.
Leading politico story today is that outside GOP groups plan to spend 1 billion dollars on election. Obama can't match that by himself.
Yeah, taxes on the rich are too high, they can't create jobs! *bunch of rich assholes throws away hundreds of millions of dollars like it's nothing*How is this even possible?
Yeah, taxes on the rich are too high, they can't create jobs! *bunch of rich assholes throws away hundreds of millions of dollars like it's nothing*
Yeah, taxes on the rich are too high, they can't create jobs! *bunch of rich assholes throws away hundreds of millions of dollars like it's nothing*
Republican super PACs and other outside groups shaped by a loose network of prominent conservatives including Karl Rove, the Koch brothers and Tom Donohue of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce plan to spend roughly $1 billion on Novembers elections for the White House and control of Congress, according to officials familiar with the groups internal operations.
That total includes previously undisclosed plans for newly aggressive spending by the Koch brothers, who are steering funding to build sophisticated, county-by-county operations in key states. POLITICO has learned that Koch-related organizations plan to spend about $400 million ahead of the 2012 elections - twice what they had been expected to commit.
Just the spending linked to the Koch network is more than the $370 million that John McCain raised for his entire presidential campaign four years ago. And the $1 billion total surpasses the $750 million that Barack Obama, one of the most prolific fundraisers ever, collected for his 2008 campaign.
...
The $1 billion in outside money is in addition to the traditional party apparatus the Romney campaign and the Republican National Committee which together intend to raise at least $800 million.
VP Speculation --
So the other day on Maddow, she was explaining in her opening monologue about how Cheney rose to power, became CEO of Halliburton, then was asked to help vet potential veeps for GWB, nominated himself, then through the VP's office was a bad bad man. We all know most of that story.
But then she noted a recent video in which Romney describes his ideal VP candidate as someone "exactly like Dick Cheney." Humor aside, I pondered.
Later, I asked my wife if she could think of anyone like Cheney. "Let's see ... evil. Bush Minion. White male, older. Impossible to like, with negative charisma. Truly reprehensible fuckhat that isn't really needed to carry a state. Probably in intelligence, maybe the military? How about John Ashcroft?"
You heard it here first: Romney/Ashcroft 2012.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/poll-walker-ahead-by-7-points-in-wisconsinPoll: Walker Ahead By 7 Points In Wisconsin Recall
The new Marquette Law School poll of the Wisconsin recall has Republican Gov. Scott Walker ahead of Democratic Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett by 7 points.
Walker has 52 percent support, to Barretts 45 percent. The survey of 600 likely voters was conducted from May 23-26, and has a 4.1 percent margin of error.
In the previous Marquette poll, conducted two weeks earlier, Walker led 50 percent to 44 percent.
The TPM Poll Average currently has Walker ahead 49.4 percent to 48.6 percent.
Consequences of not taxing away the money of high income earners.
No.
Marco Rubio
Rob Portman
Chris Christie
Paul Ryan
Bob McDonnell
John Thune
Kelly Ayotte
Will be one of them.
Condi Rice would have been perfect if she elected to do it. But, she's too smart to get slung through the mud for no reason.
WTF? How is Obama going to compete with this?
Talk about being put at a severe disadvantage... this is JUST SuperPAC and related money, don't forget about everything else. Shit.
Money isn't supposed to be everything but it is. In 2008 Obama raised, what, 780 mil whereas McCain came up quite short with less than 350 mil? I tried to keep telling myself recently that the CU decision won't be as bad as everyone thinks, but this seems to confirm that it really is. This is just the beginning. Ugh.
It was bad enough in 2008. We don't need more money being pumped into elections. Citizens United is one of the worst SCOTUS decisions in the history of the United States.
S.E. Cupp is so fine. Republicans always have the finest women.
"Read enough political coverage, and you will find someone willing to advance almost any kind of position, despite (or perhaps because of) its being counterintuitive." -Nate SilverVP Speculation --
So the other day on Maddow, she was explaining in her opening monologue about how Cheney rose to power, became CEO of Halliburton, then was asked to help vet potential veeps for GWB, nominated himself, then through the VP's office was a bad bad man. We all know most of that story.
But then she noted a recent video in which Romney describes his ideal VP candidate as someone "exactly like Dick Cheney." Humor aside, I pondered.
Later, I asked my wife if she could think of anyone like Cheney. "Let's see ... evil. Bush Minion. White male, older. Impossible to like, with negative charisma. Truly reprehensible fuckhat that isn't really needed to carry a state. Probably in intelligence, maybe the military? ... How about John Ashcroft?"
You heard it here first: Romney/Ashcroft 2012.
They're spending their money in ways that are bad for the democratic process. Many of them have that money because advantages they've gained by corrupting the democratic process. I would think by now you would know better than to post such risibly stupid arguments.The way i look at it, you should be happy. That money is flowing right back into the pockets of places that accept advertising and employing a lot of middle class families.
Why do you hate the rich spending their money?
Money isn't supposed to be everything but it is. In 2008 Obama raised, what, 780 mil whereas McCain came up quite short with less than 350 mil? I tried to keep telling myself recently that the CU decision won't be as bad as everyone thinks, but this seems to confirm that it really is. This is just the beginning. Ugh.
Obama was the first candidate to opt-out of the public financing system since it was established in 1971. If anyone was the first to say there wasn't enough money in the Presidential election, it was Obama.
The PPP survey shows Obama edging Romney among Missouri voters by the narrowest of margins, 45 percent to 44 percent. And while Obamas approval rating is in negative territory 44-52 percent Romneys favorability rating is even lower in the Show-Me State, with 38 percent viewing the former Massachusetts governor favorably compared to 50 percent who view him unfavorably.
It's going to be completely overturned next month. All this liberal intimidation of Roberts over "legacy" is lol worthy. This will be the culmination of 30+ years of stacking courts with far right judges. That is Roberts' legacy, not some idealistic nonsense.
WTF? How is Obama going to compete with this?
Talk about being put at a severe disadvantage... this is JUST SuperPAC and related money, don't forget about everything else. Shit.
Money isn't supposed to be everything but it is. In 2008 Obama raised, what, 780 mil whereas McCain came up quite short with less than 350 mil? I tried to keep telling myself recently that the CU decision won't be as bad as everyone thinks, but this seems to confirm that it really is. This is just the beginning. Ugh.
It was bad enough in 2008. We don't need more money being pumped into elections. Citizens United is one of the worst SCOTUS decisions in the history of the United States.
Aren't the liberal justices the ones most likely to step down?
Aren't the liberal justices the ones most likely to step down?
The way i look at it, you should be happy. That money is flowing right back into the pockets of places that accept advertising and employing a lot of middle class families.
Why do you hate the rich spending their money?
Aren't the liberal justices the ones most likely to step down?
E.g. Romney campaign today is saying that for his term as MA governor all that matters is what jobs he added, not net job gains or loss. Guess what he is saying for Obama?
"Fox & Friends" aired a nearly-four-minute video about President Barack Obama on Wednesday, drawing the ire of critics who say it looked, felt and sounded like a political attack ad.
The video, produced by Fox News associate producer Chris White, attacks Obama's record on job creation and the unemployment rate--and includes a dramatic, "Star Wars"-esque soundtrack. It aired twice on Wednesday's show.
"The package that aired on 'Fox & Friends' was created by an associate producer and was not authorized at the senior executive level of the network," Bill Shine, executive vice president of programming at Fox News, said in a statement to Yahoo News. "This has been addressed with the show's producers."
According to the progressive watchdog group Media Matters, the segment is the equivalent of $96,000 of free advertising for the Republican party and Mitt Romney, who clinched the 2012 GOP nomination on Tuesday.
Obama's just running the perfect campaign, that's all.I really don't see the point in attacking Romney's jobs record in Massachusetts. Their unemployment rate was around 4.2-4.5% throughout Romney's term, why is it surprising the state wasn't adding jobs with such a low UE rate?
I really don't see the point in attacking Romney's jobs record in Massachusetts. Their unemployment rate was around 4.2-4.5% throughout Romney's term, why is it surprising the state wasn't adding jobs with such a low UE rate?
WTF? How is Obama going to compete with this?
Talk about being put at a severe disadvantage... this is JUST SuperPAC and related money, don't forget about everything else. Shit.
I really don't see the point in attacking Romney's jobs record in Massachusetts. Their unemployment rate was around 4.2-4.5% throughout Romney's term, why is it surprising the state wasn't adding jobs with such a low UE rate?
The point is to show that Bain experience didn't help Romney do anything in MA and it won't help him with being the President.
They should also point out that Romney was able to reduce MA deficit by the increase of the Capital Gains tax. Something he now opposes doing.
Wait, he increased the CG tax?
If Romney's serious about this, it's worth appreciating what we know about history -- plenty of well-regarded modern presidents (Clinton, Reagan, JFK, Eisenhower, and both Roosevelts) were not businessmen before taking office. George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were successful in business, but far less so in office.
Similarly, U.S. News noted that the three men "widely considered by historians to be the worst presidents of the modern era [are] Warren G. Harding, Herbert Hoover, and George W. Bush." All three "were successful businessmen."
Actually, his MA record is not THAT bad. Obama campaign definitely risks showing Romney's moderate MA actions.
Increased before he was elected, but it brought him 500 million dollars to bridge the deficit. He also closed business tax loopholes. Increased local commercial property taxes.
Actually, his MA record is not THAT bad. Obama campaign definitely risks showing Romney's moderate MA actions.
Politico needs these races close. So very close.
Yeah, taxes on the rich are too high, they can't create jobs! *bunch of rich assholes throws away hundreds of millions of dollars like it's nothing*
GWB was not a successfull businessman.Mittens says all potential presidential candidates should have at least 3 years experience studying business:
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/30/11961881-a-three-year-minimum?lite
My favorite part:
GWB was not a successfull businessman.