So I'm watching one of these Sandy Hook conspiracy videos that my brother told me to watch and holy shit they are a riot.
Take
this video for instance (the one I believe they are watching).
9:58 - They claim that on their facebook where the post of the morning was about fundraising for their dead daugther but hours later they talk about the school being in lockdown! Inconsistency! Except that their facebook page is all jumbled up. What fucking facebook page looks like that? Why are the post times not displayed on some posts? If the person is live recording off their desktop, then where is the cursor? It looks like some photoshop type program or something. Not to mention if these people were professionals how could they fuck up that bad? Why would they be stupid enough to post fundraising prior to the shooting happening. Even if they were that stupid why wasn't that post deleted by the time it was found? Am I not suppose to believe that the government isn't efficient enough to check the pages on the facebook timeline with 1,000s of other people able to comment (most government employees according to this conspiracy). Out of the hundreds of government employees looking at that page and commenting nobody noticed that they were commenting on something before the operation happened?
4:14 - This states that there were "4 handguns" according to the latest info. It then shows this newsreport. The problem with this is that it starts off with the guy saying "this continues to be a complex investigation". That's something only said when its something new and developing. How the fuck is that "the latest info"? Breaking news stories are contradictory? No shit.
Prime example:
6:08 -This argues that its unlikely that an "autistic psycho" would be capable of killing so many kids because he has no gun experience. It compares the deaths and injuries to the Aurora shooting and Virgina Tech. I got to hand it to them. This does make sense. I mean the Aurora shooter and the Virginia Tech shooter were professional shooters just like this video claims. This also has me thinking...why would you trust a video that states that the Aurora and Virginia Tech shooters were "professional shooters"?
The entire video is nothing but with bullshit like this. It claims something in the beginning only in text with no evidence, and then shows a piece of the news story that is contradictory.
Or bad
Photoshops. Seriously did China do this? And again, why would they even consider that Emily "the girl who was suppose to be dead" to take a picture with the president. Why would they even think about that or mistake that? Did the photo coordinator think to themselves "Bring the girl who was suppose to be dead out to get hugged by the president? Maybe they are trying to prove that the conspiracy is a hoax!" Also "she forgot to change" from the first photo? She isn't wearing the same outfit. Just pay closer attention to what you are trying to morph together.
However there are two parts of it that do seem weird:
2:14 - This is "unaltered" video of the second gunman at Sandy Hook getting arrested after running into the woods. The problem with this is that its not unaltered. It does a HUGE fucking cut into a man getting arrested. Though I will admit the beginning is suspicious but the running looks weird. I mean who are they chasing? That being said you can't see shit from so far. Wouldn't be surprised if that was animated being how choppy it is.
8:09 - This part is the only one that stood out to me. The dad seems fine for one second. And then starts acting
lmao. You live with them?
You know how like 80% of college graduates move back in with their parents? I am the 80%.