2020 or 2024?
You're right, probably 2024.
2020 or 2024?
I'm not talking about 'these people'. I'm talking about people who voted for him and were disappointed.I personally think he genuinely doesn't understand just how much these people completely despise him.
Otherwise, he would've quit trying bipartisanship ages ago.
I stopped reading about Obamacare stuff a while ago. It was all bad news. I hope it comes together but ffs it was/is not looking good.I think Obamacare - while the process was messy and the final result is far from perfect - is a worthy achievement.
If the economy is solid in 2016, it won't matter - he'll have a positive legacy for resuscitating the economy and reforming healthcare.
I think the thing that will work against the Democrats a bit is population movement. The US has been continually moving south and west since the beginning ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_center_of_the_United_States_population ). I don't have exact figures, but generally the reliably blue states are either losing population or gaining population less quickly than reliably red states.
This cuts both ways, of course. CA and the other blue Pacific states are benefitting from the westward move as well, but in general 'west and south' means good for Republicans when you're currently at this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/ElectoralCollege2012.svg/800px-ElectoralCollege2012.svg.png[/I1MG]
It behooves states like Texas and Georgia to turn blue more quickly, as in 2020 they will have more electoral votes while the blue Northeast and Great Lakes continue to bleed them.[/QUOTE]
So you get a push from the northeast which is liberal down south and then a push from immigration, it raises the Ev's but also changes the demographics.
To say the GOP won't win again is crazy. To say THIS GOP won't win again is safer. If they lose big in 2016 (senate house and pres).. They will adapt. Honestly, I think Obama's terrible capitulations and embarrassing reach out to people who hate him have kept the GOP from adapting so far. If he just went hard against them it would have moved them a bit to the left, instead he half assed his way around congress and he pissed off enough liberals where the GOP isn't fully dead.
It's that population movement that's helping turn those states blue, though. In 2012 PPP asked voters in Southern states whether they'd always lived there or if they were recent (within the last 10 years) residents. The former group broke for Romney and the latter group broke for Obama.I think the thing that will work against the Democrats a bit is population movement. The US has been continually moving south and west since the beginning ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_center_of_the_United_States_population ). I don't have exact figures, but generally the reliably blue states are either losing population or gaining population less quickly than reliably red states.
This cuts both ways, of course. CA and the other blue Pacific states are benefitting from the westward move as well, but in general 'west and south' means good for Republicans when you're currently at this:
It behooves states like Texas and Georgia to turn blue more quickly, as in 2020 they will have more electoral votes while the blue Northeast and Great Lakes continue to bleed them.
ACA is doing a lot better since its initial website bullshittery. We're already at 14 million people with healthcare who didn't have it before.CoffeeJanitor said:I stopped reading about Obamacare stuff a while ago. It was all bad news. I hope it comes together but ffs it was/is not looking good.
I know you guys have probably heard this a million times but Christ, this was his one, defining implementation. Why was he not a better leader...
The man knows full well the GOP will refuse to give Obama a victory on immigration so the only way it gets done is if it goes into effect after Obama's gone. It is incredibly sad that Schumer even had to suggest this shit. This has got to go down as the worst congress of all time.
I think Obamacare - while the process was messy and the final result is far from perfect - is a worthy achievement.
If the economy is solid in 2016, it won't matter - he'll have a positive legacy for resuscitating the economy and reforming healthcare.
On the flip side you read stories out of rural America where people are saving a bunch under Obamacare, but still don't like it because they "didn't ask for it", or don't like it "in principle". There was a story here week or so ago about a pastor with 5 kids qualified for tons of subsidies under Obamacare and is saving a butt load, but still does not like it because he does not want to be a 'moocher'. These people would rather cut their noses off to spite the face. They will never appreciate it. They will all fall into the same category as all those people who receive farm subsidies, medicare, medicaid and social security and still cannot reconcile it with their hate for big gubmint.Obama has been elevated to GOAT status by my mom because of Obamacare. She's a cancer survivor, and I'm under 26, so I'm on her new Obamacare plan and we're getting way better coverage now and she's saving over $400 a month. She was a swing voter who leaned R (voted for Bush twice), but liked Obama and voted for him twice, and has been really turned off by the racism brought out in the Republican party since his election. Now she says Obama's her favorite president in her lifetime (born at the end of Eisenhower) and she can't imagine voting Republican ever again for the foreseeable future.
On the flip side you read stories out of rural America where people are saving a bunch under Obamacare, but still don't like it because they "didn't ask for it", or don't like it "in principle". There was a story here week or so ago about a pastor with 5 kids qualified for tons of subsidies under Obamacare and is saving a butt load, but still does not like it because he does not want to be a 'moocher'. These people would rather cut their noses off to spite the face. They will never appreciate it. They will all fall into the same category as all those people who receive farm subsidies, medicare, medicaid and social security and still cannot reconcile it with their hate for big gubmint.
On the flip side you read stories out of rural America where people are saving a bunch under Obamacare, but still don't like it because they "didn't ask for it", or don't like it "in principle". There was a story here week or so ago about a pastor with 5 kids qualified for tons of subsidies under Obamacare and is saving a butt load, but still does not like it because he does not want to be a 'moocher'. These people would rather cut their noses off to spite the face. They will never appreciate it. They will all fall into the same category as all those people who receive farm subsidies, medicare, medicaid and social security and still cannot reconcile it with their hate for big gubmint.
I like the story from Kentucky where a woman signed up for KYnect (Kentucky's ACA exchange) and was happy because she thought it meant she didn't have to sign up for Obamacare.On the flip side you read stories out of rural America where people are saving a bunch under Obamacare, but still don't like it because they "didn't ask for it", or don't like it "in principle". There was a story here week or so ago about a pastor with 5 kids qualified for tons of subsidies under Obamacare and is saving a butt load, but still does not like it because he does not want to be a 'moocher'. These people would rather cut their noses off to spite the face. They will never appreciate it. They will all fall into the same category as all those people who receive farm subsidies, medicare, medicaid and social security and still cannot reconcile it with their hate for big gubmint.
What about all those elderly who spend the end of their lives not experiencing the dignity of work and instead rely on government handouts that have reduced our labor force by millions? End social security it makes things to comfortable for the elderly, I'm sure grandma can find a job.If conservatives are so worried about people not experiencing the "dignity" of working, then does that mean they support the idea of creating a massive jobs creation program like the New Deal?/rhetoricalquestion
Ben Shapiro's out at Breitbart. How the hell does someone like that lose their job at a place like that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVdx-yCeDeY
Holy shit this is the most Republican ad I've ever seen in my entire life.
Are you sure about that?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVdx-yCeDeY
Holy shit this is the most Republican ad I've ever seen in my entire life.
I actually can remember the feeling I felt watching this live. I don't think I can think of a more memorable political moment in my lifetime.
The GAF DNC thread was hilarious. People were losing their damn minds during his speech.
lol @ other lady who isn't Laura Ingraham thinking GOP doing something about immigration will make the Hispanics vote for them again? Yeah, some. I don't think they're going to overwhelmingly back them though.
She had basically no response to anything George Will and Juan said. It was like watching a car wreck in slow motion.This is why republicans are doomed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAwajgobjQk
I actually felt bad for George Will, lord help me. How do you debate with someone who has no intellectual interest in anything, and whose sole goal is to rile up anger? And notice how she claims the GOP and democrat establishments are out of tune with the majority of the country. The vast majority of the country supports a path to citizenship. She is skewing the country to focus on 25-30%.
Ultimately her concern isn't winning elections. The more republicans lose, the higher her ratings go because it fosters anger in the base. Beck, Savage, Rush, etc couldn't give a shit less about winning elections.
It was a damn good speech. I almost forgot I couldn't vote for him.
lol @ other lady who isn't Laura Ingraham thinking GOP doing something about immigration will make the Hispanics vote for them again? Yeah, some. I don't think they're going to overwhelmingly back them though.
And then you got sad immediately after the realization.
Meh, I don't think their vote is for sale anymore. They are going to remember this and call the Democratic party home, unless they happen to have some very far right religious/social views (which DOES apply in some cases but moving forward, generally, Hispanics = blue).The point is not to win Hispanic voters per se, it's to stop Hispanic voters from being an automatic win for Democrat's. If the GOP were getting Dubya in Texas numbers among Hispanic voters, they could still win national elections. But, if Hispanics start voting for the DNC 70-30 or 80-20 consistently because the GOP is made up of people who want to deport Grandma Maria, then they're doomed.
well
you're not insane though
haha, this fucking guy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTtafucOE4M
This is why republicans are doomed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAwajgobjQk
I actually felt bad for George Will, lord help me. How do you debate with someone who has no intellectual interest in anything, and whose sole goal is to rile up anger? And notice how she claims the GOP and democrat establishments are out of tune with the majority of the country. The vast majority of the country supports a path to citizenship. She is skewing the country to focus on 25-30%.
Ultimately her concern isn't winning elections. The more republicans lose, the higher her ratings go because it fosters anger in the base. Beck, Savage, Rush, etc couldn't give a shit less about winning elections.
haha, this fucking guy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTtafucOE4M
The point is not to win Hispanic voters per se, it's to stop Hispanic voters from being an automatic win for Democrat's. If the GOP were getting Dubya in Texas numbers among Hispanic voters, they could still win national elections. But, if Hispanics start voting for the DNC 70-30 or 80-20 consistently because the GOP is made up of people who want to deport Grandma Maria, then they're doomed.
Eh, maybe.The point is not to win Hispanic voters per se, it's to stop Hispanic voters from being an automatic win for Democrat's. If the GOP were getting Dubya in Texas numbers among Hispanic voters, they could still win national elections. But, if Hispanics start voting for the DNC 70-30 or 80-20 consistently because the GOP is made up of people who want to deport Grandma Maria, then they're doomed.
Well Wisconsin's love affair with Scott Walker is pretty weird considering they just elected a big city liberal lesbian woman as senator.zero shift said:Florida has always interested me because it is one of the very few (if only) states that has both the reddest of the red voters along with democrats. Is there any other swing state that has conservatives' this conservative?
It's odd how quickly Colorado became a swing state. Clinton won it in 92 by a small margin, lost in 96 by a small margin, went for Bush both times by big margins, then for Obama both times by big margins.Colorado comes to mind as another swing state that has a mix of really blue voters (sizable Hispanic/Latino population, and Boulder is hippie central) and really red voters (military, & Colorado Springs is the home of Focus on the Family).
People here just don't realize how far to the right Walker is. Many just see him as "oh that guy who stands up to the unions."Well Wisconsin's love affair with Scott Walker is pretty weird considering they just elected a big city liberal lesbian woman as senator.
I remember when I went to school in CSU - Pueblo I was amazed with how conservative the whites there were. When Obama won the tears were...horrifying. A lot of "it was about race" was repeated for some time after the election.Colorado comes to mind as another swing state that has a mix of really blue voters (sizable Hispanic/Latino population, and Boulder is hippie central) and really red voters (military, & Colorado Springs is the home of Focus on the Family).
It's also worth noting that Hispanics will face some interesting transition periods in the coming years/generations due to assimilation. As more begin to identify as white, and as immigration becomes less of an issue, we could see a shift in a variety of things, from religion to voting patterns.
It's also worth noting that Hispanics will face some interesting transition periods in the coming years/generations due to assimilation. As more begin to identify as white, and as immigration becomes less of an issue, we could see a shift in a variety of things, from religion to voting patterns.
All for naught. The Republican base is just racist and xenophobic (per a decades-old outreach program to that specific demographic) and perceive diversity as a threat. The Republican party will be whites only for a few more decades to come.
To be fair Karl Rove is a pretty terrible strategist.Political parties adapt over time. The left wing parties of the 80's and 90's were hemorrhaging voters before figures like Clinton, Blair, Whitlam, Schröder etc. who moved their parties more into neoliberalism. Parties are designed to win elections, once that stops happening they adapt to new realities.
Even if the republican party went down in flames, some new right wing party would emerge to take its place almost immediately. Karl Rove used to talk about his "permanent coalition", see how that turned out?
To be fair Karl Rove is a pretty terrible strategist.
His winning strategy worked exactly one time.
To be fair Karl Rove is a pretty terrible strategist.
His winning strategy worked exactly one time.
It's odd how quickly Colorado became a swing state. Clinton won it in 92 by a small margin, lost in 96 by a small margin, went for Bush both times by big margins, then for Obama both times by big margins.
That would probably help a fair deal. If there's any issue in modern US politics where the two parties are clearly divergent - and are actually willing to enforce their position if elected - it's gay marriage.I recently saw a Republican elected state official from the mega rich mountain district of Evergreen speak, and she thinks Republicans could easily have Colorado back if they just backed gay marriage, citing the gay marriage ban of 2006 as the turning point, and I think it's possible she's right.
Now admittedly, I know Colorado mostly from Denver, Boulder and the ski resorts towns, but I always got the sense that Colorado's conservationism had a frontier, self reliance and leave me the fuck alone slant.It also seems pretty weird to me that it passed legalized marijuana while it wouldn't have stood a chance in all the other states that are supposedly much much more liberal. And yet it was also one of the few states that went to the uber religious Santorum in the primaries over Romney.
I live here, and even I can't explain it. I guess when you add up all the extreme demographics, including the big city denver liberals, the college towns, the super rich suburbs, the laid back rich ski resort towns, the farm areas, the military towns, and the latino areas, and you just get a mess of mathmatics that is completely untamable.
Now admittedly, I know Colorado mostly from Denver, Boulder and the ski resorts towns, but I always got the sense that Colorado's conservationism had a frontier, self reliance and leave me the fuck alone slant.
Also, you guys smoke crazy amount of weed, especially in Boulder, and I say it as someone who used to live in Seattle.
That would probably help a fair deal. If there's any issue in modern US politics where the two parties are clearly divergent - and are actually willing to enforce their position if elected - it's gay marriage.
I'm actually a little worried Republicans could co-opt legalizing pot as an issue from the Democrats which would also help them with younger voters, but it would seem most leaders of both parties don't want to touch it for some reason. Who the fuck cares?
This holds true everywhere I've been in the US.I move 20 miles north to Denver and it's like I've moved to a different state. It's kindof a surreal to think about, though I guess the citizens of Austin probably feel the same way. Its just the ratios are such that statewide elections aren't quite the same as Texas. Though I do admit Denver does have a more libertarian feel to it than a liberal one.
Well Wisconsin's love affair with Scott Walker is pretty weird considering they just elected a big city liberal lesbian woman as senator.