Already got em. Gilmore surprised allWhen should we get numbers for Reps?
10
Already got em. Gilmore surprised allWhen should we get numbers for Reps?
That makes sense. I'm pretty happy either way, but rooting for Hillary.
Ah yeah, my bad.Again, this isn't like a primary. Even if a caucus has 6 delegates, and Bernie takes 60% of the vote, he's not going to net a ton even among the bigger areas.
He also should be doing better in places like Black Hawk County and a few other Obama places where he's not.
So does the chat have like no moderation or what
More than two candidates and a much different process?Why are the Republican results so far behind? See, this is what you get when you put Republicans in charge of things!
Why are the Republican results so far behind? See, this is what you get when you put Republicans in charge of things!
How the hell is "other" at 7 votes and Jim Gilmore at 0???
who the fuck is "other?"
How the hell is "other" at 7 votes and Jim Gilmore at 0???
who the fuck is "other?"
Why are the Democratic Caucuses reporting much faster than the Republican? Shouldn't the system the Democrats use take up way more time until the results are determined?
More than two candidates and a much different process?
25% precincts reporting:
Hillary: 52.7%
Bernie: 46.8%
O'Mlley: 0.4%
So far with 7 percent of precincts in, Cruz leading 30 percent to 29 percent for Trump, 18 percent for Rubio. Raw votes so far much closer between Trump/Cruz than entrance polls indicated, and Rubio further down. BUT, this could be misleading: These are most likely tiny, more rural caucus sites that are easier to count fast. For Trump and Rubio, bigger is better. As YUGE suburban precincts start reporting votes, Id expect Trump and Rubios numbers to go up.
They have paper ballots too? This process is ridiculous.
I'm amazed carson is still at 10%. like...what the hell are those people voting for? what's the argument?
From Poligaf member diablos, I believe one definition is: "To speculate, theorise, or panic based on no or irrational evidence."
Gilmore and an unidentified man should team up for an independent bid. Screw these rigged parties.
It's looking like the Clinton camp got the O'Malley voters to jump to them
25% precincts reporting:
Hillary: 52.7%
Bernie: 46.8%
O'Mlley: 0.4%
Jeb Bush is currently projected to win about 2,600 votes in Iowa, or about 2 percent of the overall turnout. That would work out to one vote per $25,000 in spending by Bushs super PAC, Right to Rise, which has spent a total of $64.8 million so far. (Granted, not all of that money has been spent in Iowa.)
These HandsI'm amazed carson is still at 10%. like...what the hell are those people voting for? what's the argument?
Jeb Bush: Proving that SuperPACs may have been bad but that the rich are too stupid to actually buy elections.
Jeb Bush is currently projected to win about 2,600 votes in Iowa, or about 2 percent of the overall turnout. That would work out to one vote per $25,000 in spending by Bushs super PAC, Right to Rise, which has spent a total of $64.8 million so far. (Granted, not all of that money has been spent in Iowa.)