A half-assed victory that only pulls further cracks in her "inevitable" narrative. I dont see it for ha, sorry.
He couldn't win in what should be his third best state. That's bad. Full sopt.
A half-assed victory that only pulls further cracks in her "inevitable" narrative. I dont see it for ha, sorry.
2016 US Election Cinematic UniverseThis election has been endlessly entertaining. I really don't think a movie could even cover all of this.
So, okay, can one honestly make the argument that even if Sanders won, narrowly, that this was a state that catered to his demographics and he had to fight tooth-and-nail for it, so why would he do better in diverse SEC states?
A half-assed victory that only pulls further cracks in her "inevitable" narrative. I dont see it for ha, sorry.
He couldn't win in what should be his third best state. That's bad. Full sopt.
Use loaded dice.And on the flip side, Sanders couldn't win in a state that is overwhelmingly white. How is he supposed to win when the demographics aren't in his favor?
A half-assed victory that only pulls further cracks in her "inevitable" narrative. I dont see it for ha, sorry.
He couldn't win in what should be his third best state. That's bad. Full sopt.
I think the media ex cnn has actually been somewhat charitable to ha. And she's done a good job baking in getting blown out in NH. Can't let it be close in NV or she's capuT.
I think they know sanders Rubio would be pretty bad for business LOL.gotta chase that dead heat narrative somehow.
gotta chase that dead heat narrative somehow.
Wolf Blitzer must have started cumming uncontrollably when he saw how close last night was getting.
That's a Shrillary move, like with the coins. Bernie's too honest for that, he'd never betray us, we're practically family.Use loaded dice.
Iowa heavily favors Bernie demographics. Not a whole lot of blacks, Latinos and immigrants there and its a closed system to boot. Hillary squeeking a win there means he's toast.A half-assed victory that only pulls further cracks in her "inevitable" narrative. I dont see it for ha, sorry.
Robert Costa said:SCOOP: Per sources, SCOTT BROWN to endorse Trump tonight at NH rally https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/02/scott-brown-to-endorse-trump/
I know Trump has said nice things about Brown in the past but this is crazy - crazy. Great way to bounce back from Iowa.
The argument is that a month ago Sanders was way behind in Iowa so this establishes that he can close the gap in other states. I don't completely buy it but its clear that HRC isn't connecting to younger white voters. She needs to address this ahead of the general.
Whew! Then again, Palin, Branstad, and Dole didn't do help Trump in Iowa :{I know Trump has said nice things about Brown in the past but this is crazy - crazy. Great way to bounce back from Iowa.
I know Trump has said nice things about Brown in the past but this is crazy - crazy. Great way to bounce back from Iowa.
I can't keep up with this thread -- going like 2 pages per hour now -- but wanted to note I think Trump polling vs. reality might be a real thing to watch over the next few primaries. Could be seeing stated wisdom losing to pragmatism.
I dunno, carry on.
Ivs you used to be on our side. What happened? When did the bern within you extinguish?
MILFORD, N.H. Former Massachusetts senator Scott P. Brown, a moderate Republican who two years ago ran for Senate in New Hampshire, will endorse Donald Trump at rally here Tuesday night, one week before the states presidential primary.
I want a miniseries in the worst way. Put it on Amazon, Netflix, HBO.. just do it justice. This is entertaining, multi-multi-multi-layered material.This election has been endlessly entertaining. I really don't think a movie could even cover all of this.
I know Trump has said nice things about Brown in the past but this is crazy - crazy. Great way to bounce back from Iowa.
Scott seems like a good get for Trump.
C'mon PredictIt, stabilize.
I just thought about something.
How much is Bernie expected to win by in NH? Because if he doesn't win by double digits, he's toast, IMO.
55-40 is my guess for tuesday. She only needs 9 from there accounting for super delegates.
The argument is that a month ago Sanders was way behind in Iowa so this establishes that he can close the gap in other states. I don't completely buy it but its clear that HRC isn't connecting to younger white voters. She needs to address this ahead of the general.
I'm a little more pessimistic, I think Bernie takes NH 60-40. He's not going to get a more favorable state until Vermont.
60-40? Has any Democrat did that in the last 40 years?
2012:60-40? Has any Democrat did that in the last 40 years?
Barack Obama 49,080 80.91% 10
Ron Paul 2,289 3.77% -
Mitt Romney 1,814 2.99% -
Jon Huntsman 1,238 2.04% -
Ed Cowan 945 1.56% -
Vermin Supreme 833 1.37% -
Younger voters of nearly all demographics are breaking towards Sanders; Hillary's main issue is that her argument boils down to:
"I have the best resume, and political agility (willing to change positions for political gain) so I should be the nominee."
It's not hard to understand why no one is excited about her, essentially liberals are settling because she wouldn't be as bad as a Republican... But that's fundamentally means you aren't voting FOR something instead you're voting top STOP something. "I'll stop Antonin Scalia Jr. from getting on the SCOTUS and instead appoint a judge who is a liberal on social issues, but who leans right on economic issues!"
Melkr u got owned so hard in the ot thread. I wept
When's the last time we had a 2-man race at this point with one of the candidates being from New England?
Cruz said Reagan didn't have any consultants giving him talking points back in 1980 lol. "Speaking from the heart"
Scott seems like a good get for Trump.
C'mon PredictIt, stabilize.
Why would she choose a judge who leans right on economic issues?
Younger voters of nearly all demographics are breaking towards Sanders; Hillary's main issue is that her argument boils down to:
"I have the best resume, and political agility (willing to change positions for political gain) so I should be the nominee."
It's not hard to understand why no one is excited about her, essentially liberals are settling because she wouldn't be as bad as a Republican... But that's fundamentally means you aren't voting FOR something instead you're voting top STOP something. "I'll stop Antonin Scalia Jr. from getting on the SCOTUS and instead appoint a judge who is a liberal on social issues, but who leans right on economic issues!"
I haven't stopped laughing about this Scott Brown nonsense.
1992: H.W. Bush vs. Pat BuchananWhen's the last time we had a 2-man race at this point with one of the candidates being from New England?