I qualify. Tax cut please.Only if you make more than $250k. Otherwise, try again once you've created more jobs.
I qualify. Tax cut please.Only if you make more than $250k. Otherwise, try again once you've created more jobs.
I guess Univision and Telemundo are white people TV networks now.
I qualify. Tax cut please.
I dont understand what you mean that its technically not true. Hispanic was a term invented for the census. It is not a race. I think I would know, myself being white hispanic.
And I guess your anecdote is meant to trump the fact that there are literally white hispanics, and black hispanics, because the nations of the Dominican Republic and Argentina or Uruguay exist?
I feel like you are completely missing the point I'm making.
I'm not saying all hispanics are white, I'm saying hispanic is not a race. Because it's fucking not.
I'm a white hispanic.
Its a thing.
Btw, latino ain't a race either.
Since yall discussing that thing.
And brazilians generally do not identify as latino or hispanic. Because we mad racist and hate our neighbours.
I feel like you are completely missing the point I'm making.
I'm not saying all hispanics are white, I'm saying hispanic is not a race. Because it's fucking not.
You understand that race is social and not biological, right?
I never said they were a race. But they are a minority ethnic group with a characteristic set of shared cultural traits that influence their voting tendencies.
It's strange that they would hate Rubio but not Trump when Trump has no conservative values he's just saying whatever to get votes.It's more about the anti-establishment (anyone but Rubio) voter bloc that exists in the party and how they stack up at this point. That fight, whether that'll be with Cruz or Trump v. Rubio, is one that you'd think the establishment guy would win, but I'm not so sure. You can say that Rubio is gonna be another Romney, but if Romney didn't have the money to sink into his own campaign last time he would've been in more trouble against Santorum/Newt who had no money put together. I don't think Rubio has that same advantage, even if the money will be behind him.
Someone like Trump won't have that problem (if he's in it for the long haul, which is debatable now that he's lost) and Cruz will have a lot of anti-establishment support behind him too and will probably win a shitload of southern states (you know, where the actual base of the party resides).
It's gonna be fascinating to see play out. Because a lot of conservatives really hate Rubio.
Btw, latino ain't a race either.
Since yall discussing that thing.
And brazilians generally do not identify as latino or hispanic. Because we mad racist and hate our neighbours.
We do exist. And frankly the whole "white-looking" thing like all we're really doing is passing as white, that Melkr said is insulting.
Is the pope white? Is he hispanic? He's from Argentina. And he was touted as the first hispanic pope, but he's got no Spanish ancestry.
Our borders are almost always delimited by somewhat wide rivers or mountains, even between states, so kinda tricky.You should build a giant wall to keep them out. It's what all the cool countries do.
And kitchen appliances
But, for those who want less liberal policies also supported Bernie. this was only 7% of voters so it was really a small amount of people but those few people sure are stupid.
My family's from Portugal. This is the first I've heard of being Hispanic.
no no wait a fucking minute. I may have worded that terribly, but thats not what I meant. I apologize for that.
What I am trying to say is that If you are a white hispanic, some if not most non white-hispanics will assume you are "white". That doesnt mean you are not part of a minority group.
So I'm looking at some entrance polls.
Mostly it all alligns with what we know or believe.
But this one perplexes me.
So on a question about Obama's legacy, it asks if you believe we should expand on his policies, go more liberal, or go less liberal.
As expected, those who support expanding on Obama's policies voted overwhelming for Clinton. And those who want a more liberal push voted for Bernie.
But, for those who want less liberal policies also supported Bernie. this was only 7% of voters so it was really a small amount of people but those few people sure are stupid.
Anyway, Clinton dominated with the minority vote last night, as small as it was (9%).
In another important note, Clinton won the health care argument. In fact, Bernie only wins the income inequality argument.
Bernie's supporters seems to be one-issue supporters. Another reason why his prospects going forward are dim. He can't build a coalition.
So I'm looking at some entrance polls.
Mostly it all alligns with what we know or believe.
But this one perplexes me.
So on a question about Obama's legacy, it asks if you believe we should expand on his policies, go more liberal, or go less liberal.
As expected, those who support expanding on Obama's policies voted overwhelming for Clinton. And those who want a more liberal push voted for Bernie.
But, for those who want less liberal policies also supported Bernie. this was only 7% of voters so it was really a small amount of people but those few people sure are stupid.
Anyway, Clinton dominated with the minority vote last night, as small as it was (9%).
In another important note, Clinton won the health care argument. In fact, Bernie only wins the income inequality argument.
Bernie's supporters seems to be one-issue supporters. Another reason why his prospects going forward are dim. He can't build a coalition.
Well that's interesting. That 7% is pretty lulz-y, but I can't say I expected her to win on healthcare. I mean, I agree with her, but I still can't say I expected it.
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Anybody who watched all of Ted Cruz's far too long, rambling, overly flamboyant speech last nite would say that was his Howard Dean moment!
Alright, Jeb's oppo team has finally found indisputable proof that Marco Rubio is gay
Wrap it up, evangelicals. That is clearly Marco Rubio's face behind that other guy's head.
Is this real?Alright, Jeb's oppo team has finally found indisputable proof that Marco Rubio is gay
Wrap it up, evangelicals. That is clearly Marco Rubio's face behind that other guy's head.
Alright, Jeb's oppo team has finally found indisputable proof that Marco Rubio is gay
Wrap it up, evangelicals. That is clearly Marco Rubio's face behind that other guy's head.
Sanders got crushed in.... households that had a union member in them???
Well aren't these exit polls just full of surprises. Anyone have a link so I can go through them?
Is this real?
Alright, Jeb's oppo team has finally found indisputable proof that Marco Rubio is gay
Wrap it up, evangelicals. That is clearly Marco Rubio's face behind that other guy's head.
Not actually from Jeb - that was a joke. Primary source is the blog of one of Rubio's classmates...or something.Is this real?
Well aren't these exit polls just full of surprises. Anyone have a link so I can go through them?
That's hot.Alright, Jeb's oppo team has finally found indisputable proof that Marco Rubio is gay
Wrap it up, evangelicals. That is clearly Marco Rubio's face behind that other guy's head.
I qualify. Tax cut please.
For years, researchers warned that laws requiring voters to show certain forms of photo identification at the poll would discriminate against racial minorities and other groups. Now, the first study has been released showing that the proliferation of voter ID laws in recent years has indeed driven down minority voter turnout, and by a significant amount.
In a new paper entitled Voter Identification Laws and the Suppression of Minority Votes, researchers at the University of California, San Diego Zoltan Hajnal, Nazita Lajevardi and Bucknell University Lindsay Nielson used data from the annual Cooperative Congressional Election Study to compare states with strict voter ID laws to those that allow voters without photo ID to cast a ballot. They found a clear and significant dampening effect on minority turnout in strict voter ID states.
Democratic turnout drops by an estimated 8.8 percentage points in general elections when strict photo identification laws are in place, compared to just 3.6 percentage points for Republicans.
Nine states currently have strict photo ID laws, including populous states like Texas, Georgia, and Virginia. Republicans in other states like Missouri are pushing to adopt the measure.
Lmao what is happening this election cycle
Lmao what is happening this election cycle
@desmoinesdem: MSNBC is completely wrong. The coin flip settled 1 COUNTY DELEGATE in several precincts. Clinton's ahead by a few STATE DELEGATE EQUIVALENTS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YCEmDZPnbURubio: "The truth is, when I was in college I bought some boots like that, and remember the old foam parties? Remember that? You don’t remember that…I bought some of those and when I left the foam party they were white. Because the foam washed the dye out of it.”
Fallon: “You used to go to those dance parties?”
Rubio: “I went one time"
So the coin tosses didn't actually determine the win?