benjipwns
Banned
From the Hillary thread:
Hillary Clinton just doesnt get it: Shes already running a losing campaign
Hillary Clinton just doesnt get it: Shes already running a losing campaign
Hillary Clinton joins the race for president today. If you believe the leaks from her staff, and theres no reason you shouldnt, shell do it in a video released at noon as she herself flies high above the nation in a chartered plane. She and her top advisors, all smart people, must think its a good idea. It doesnt feel like one.
For months Clinton has run a front-porch campaign if by porch you mean Boo Radleys. Getting her outdoors is hard enough; when she does get out its often to give paid speeches to people who look just like her: educated, prosperous and privileged. Needing desperately to connect with the broader public, she opts for the virtual reality of a pre-taped video delivered via social media. Go figure.
Her leakers say shell head out on a listening tour like the one that kicked off her first Senate race. They say listening to real people talk about real stuff will make her seem more real. This too may be a good idea, but it made more sense when she was a rookie candidate seeking a lesser office in a state she barely knew. Running for president is different. So are the times. Voters are more desperate now, and in a far worse mood. If you invite their questions, youd better have some answers. Ill return to this point shortly.
Her leakers say shell avoid big events, rallies, stadiums, that sort of thing. This is about 2008, when she and her tone-deaf team seemed to be planning a coronation. This time they say she doesnt want to come off as quite so presumptuous. Yet next week she keynotes a Global Womens Summit cohosted by Tina Brown and the New York Times, at which world leaders, industry icons, movie stars and CEOs convene with artists, rebels, peacemakers and activists to tell their stories and share their plans of action. Orchestra seats go for $300.
Clinton personifies the meritocracy that to an angry middle class looks increasingly like just another privileged caste. Its the anger captured best by the old Die Yuppie Scum posters and in case you havent noticed, its on the rise. Republicans love to paint Democrats as elitists. Its how the first two Bushes took out Dukakis, Gore and Kerry and how Jeb plans to take out Hillary. When she says she and Bill were broke when they left the White House; when she sets her own email rules and says it was only for her own convenience; when she hangs out with the Davos, Wall Street or Hollywood crowds, she makes herself a more inviting target.
During its long ramp-up, Democrats searched for signs that this Clinton campaign would be better than the last, a seething cauldron of rivalries and resentments run by D.C. consultants who made their real livings from corporate clients. Things do look better at the top. The chief of staff is John Podesta, a man whose core competency is competency. Pollster Joel Benenson is a huge step up from the fiercely anti-populist Mark Penn.
Still, the leaks are a bad sign. All campaigns fall prey to them and its sometimes a good thing for the First Amendment that they do. All White House staffs leak to settle scores or advance agendas and careers. Bill Clintons White House added a new wrinkle leaks that elevated the leaker at Clintons expense. Often the leaker wanted only to prove his insider status and savvy; the result was to frame everything Clinton did as political even before he did it. Every modern president polled as much as Clinton but none was so scorned for it. Leakers had a lot to do with that.
All political reportage is full of insider tales about how every link of sausage is made. When House Democrats resumed their push for a minimum wage hike, staff framed the initiative not as sound policy but as clever politics. Even if authorized, nearly all such leaks harm the principle. On Friday, Clintons campaign let slip its aim to raise $2.5 billion; maybe thats not the best way to say hello to a struggling middle class. Someone gabbed about the message of Hillarys planned sit downs with average families, a sure fire way to make the families look and feel like props and to make the whole, hollow exercise look and feel like a hollow exercise.
There are three problems that go far deeper than Hillarys image or her campaigns operations. Each is endemic to our current politics; all are so deeply connected as to be inseparable. You already know them. The first is how they raise their money. The second is how they craft their message. The third pertains to policy.
Leaders as progressive as Howard Dean and Barney Frank urge Democrats to circle the wagons and spare the party the bloodshed of a real contest, but this party needs to get its blood moving. Clinton needs a real challenge and a real debate, not just a sparring partner; not some palooka to dance her around the ring for a couple of rounds, but a real fighter. She needs the debate. We all do. But who will bring it?
Underdogs always need to get an early start, so its surprising that Clinton beat all of her prospective primary opponents into the race. Some seem to be auditioning for the second spot on her ticket. Others may not make the race. If no champion emerges, progressives must mount their own debate and relearn some of the skills they applied so successfully back in the days before everybody had a PAC.