plagiarize
Banned
Aw fuck, Alexis Arquette died. That sucks.
I'm one of the good onesReddit and IGN are sending their worst. They're wrestling fans, they're anime fans, they're comic book fans, and some, I assume, are good people.
Yeah.Aw fuck, Alexis Arquette died. That sucks.
Better than having to explain to people what 'web inspector' is and can do.
I didn't even realize that Obama only (only, lol) won CA by 23 in 12.
Its not like a VP candidate refused to call the leader of the KKK deplorable or that there was violence at a trump rally or that he continues to lie
.Gaming side, of course.
Kaine's donation everyone freaked out about never became an issue. Neither did all of the homophobic shit Pence has done and said either tho to be fair.
Are Pence's comments getting attention anywhere? I can't find a single story on any of the big news sites I've checked.
Kaine's donation everyone freaked out about never became an issue. Neither did all of the homophobic shit Pence has done and said either tho to be fair.
Josh Jordan
‏@NumbersMuncher
One HUGE lesson from 2012 is that enthusiasm is great, but any candidate can overcome that with money and a vast get out the vote operation.
Josh Jordan ‏@NumbersMuncher 1h1 hour ago
Hillary is going to have weeks of early voting to use those offices to get people to the polls that might not otherwise vote. A huge deal.
Josh Jordan ‏@NumbersMuncher 1h1 hour ago
And while Hillary is padding her lead with early voters Trump will pouring the little money he has doing rallies in stadiums. Unforgivable.
Josh Jordan ‏@NumbersMuncher 1h1 hour ago
Campaigns have become incredibly sophisticated in targeting unreliable voters during early voting. Trump won't even have ability to do it.
Josh Jordan ‏@NumbersMuncher 1h1 hour ago
And if you don't think Hillary leading Trump in battleground field offices 291-88 is a big deal, you're in for a huge shock in November.
Josh Jordan ‏@NumbersMuncher 1h1 hour ago
Last note: If Trump is down by 3-4 points nationally among likely voters and Hillary has 3x the field offices, how does Trump possibly win?
That 32% in CA for Trump is probably close to his ceiling. Hillary is likely to crack 65+ and Trump mid to low 30's
So I guess the first debate will now be about health rather than emails, the second now about emails, and the third... Benghazi?
It's possible trump does not break 30% at all in Cali.Also, if I recall the person who got the highest share of the vote ever in California was FDR. I think hilary can beat FDR's vote share in Cali if she is lucky.
https://twitter.com/NumbersMuncher/status/775524389605535744
Worth a read.
--
Theres more but I pulled the best ones.
Not presidential horserace at all, but I thought this was a pretty interesting article:
Can Teenage Defiance Be Manipulated for Good?
(it covers a lot of other studies, too)
What does Poli-GAF think?
Not presidential horserace at all, but I thought this was a pretty interesting article:
Can Teenage Defiance Be Manipulated for Good?
(it covers a lot of other studies, too)
What does Poli-GAF think?
Pixelated Boat‏ @pixelatedboat
[Hillary Clinton's office, 2012]
*Hillary sneezes violently, the force of the sneeze depresses a button labelled DO BENGHAZI*
Hillary: Oh no
Not presidential horserace at all, but I thought this was a pretty interesting article:
Can Teenage Defiance Be Manipulated for Good?
(it covers a lot of other studies, too)
What does Poli-GAF think?
Italics denote pickups.
Safe Republican (12)
Alabama - Richard Shelby (R) vs. Ron Crumpton (D)
Alaska - Lisa Murkowski (R) vs. Rey Metcalfe (D)
Arkansas - John Boozman (R) vs. Conner Eldridge (D)
Georgia - Johnny Isakson (R) vs. Jim Barksdale (D)
Idaho - Mike Crapo (R) vs. Jerry Sturgill (D)
Kansas - Jerry Moran (R) vs. Patrick Wiesner (D)
Kentucky - Rand Paul (R) vs. Jim Gray (D)
North Dakota - John Hoeven (R) vs. Eliot Glassheim (D)
Oklahoma - James Lankford (R) vs. Mike Workman (D)
South Carolina - Tim Scott (R) vs. Thomas Dixon (D)
South Dakota - John Thune (R) vs. Jay Williams (D)
Utah - Mike Lee (R) vs. Misty Snow (D)
Likely Republican (3)
Iowa - Chuck Grassley (R) vs. Patty Judge (D)
Louisiana - ???
Ohio - Rob Portman (R) vs. Ted Strickland (D)
Lean Republican (2)
Arizona - John McCain (R) vs. Ann Kirkpatrick (D)
Missouri - Roy Blunt (R) vs. Jason Kander (D)
Tossup (5)
Florida - Marco Rubio (R) vs. Patrick Murphy (D)
Nevada - Catherine Cortez Masto (D) vs. Joe Heck (R)
New Hampshire - Kelly Ayotte (R) vs. Maggie Hassan (D)
North Carolina - Richard Burr (R) vs. Deborah Ross (D)
Pennsylvania - Pat Toomey (R) vs. Katie McGinty (D)
Lean Democratic (1)
Indiana - Evan Bayh (D) vs. Todd Young (R)
Likely Democratic (2)
Illinois - Mark Kirk (R) vs. Tammy Duckworth (D)
Wisconsin - Ron Johnson (R) vs. Russ Feingold (D)
Safe Democratic (9)
California - Kamala Harris (D) vs. Loretta Sanchez (D) *Likely Harris*
Colorado - Michael Bennet (D) vs. Darryl Glenn (R)
Connecticut - Richard Blumenthal (D) vs. Dan Carter (R)
Hawaii - Brian Schatz (D) vs. John Carroll (R)
Maryland - Chris Van Hollen (D) vs. Kathy Szeliga (R)
New York - Chuck Schumer (D) vs. Wendy Long (R)
Oregon - Ron Wyden (D) vs. Mark Callahan (R)
Vermont - Patrick Leahy (D) vs. Scott Milne (R)
Washington - Patty Murray (D) vs. Chris Vance (R)
I still can't believe the NYGOP found someone dumb enough to run against Schumer.
She ran against Gillibrand too!
Do we want to condition people to make decisions based on emotions even though those might be 'better' decisions?
Could be a short-term gain, but a long-term loss.
Ha you can tell when Clinton just lost when Cooper asked her doesn't this incident prove she's not honest and trustworthy.
She better have a God as press secretary lined up.
This is backwards. Every decision is based on emotion you can't avoid that
Compared to absolutely every other Hillary stumble/scandal/screwup of the campaign that I'm likely to panic about, I'm taking the Deplorables thing as almost a non-thing. This is not logical.
I realized it's Gamergate. I'm too used to the alt-right crap. I know the lingo, I know the memes, I know their typical tactics, fucking Pepe, I know their preferred language and attack methods. It's not at all new to me for these people to be flagged as all-around miserable human beings. No irony needed, no exaggerations, it's simply a factual statement to me.
The average voter has no freaking clue how awful that segment of the Trump base is. Like nooooooo clue. Hell, I'd say even the more casual poster or lurker here doesn't know how deep this goes. Even if you sat them down to explain it and showed them all the receipts, they'd never think there could be people that downright terrible floating around that are allowed to vote. The more it gets exposed, the more it'll click with people. One of the most predictable tendencies of the alt-right is for it make complete fools of themselves, and, lo and behold, they're already making a lovely effort of that. Even better, they're proud of themselves! The reaction on Reddit was proof--On Sunday the dominant discussion was Hillary's health and not the thing she said that, one would think, would infuriate them all.
So explaining this concept to my parents and some friends have them confused. They're all in a panic. The media lacks the perspective, too. People say her statement was too broad or a gaffe, but it was quite careful. Even the non-apology clarification was that she didn't mean half; She still entirely meant what she said at its core. Even if Hillary herself and the campaign don't understand it, they said the absolute perfect thing. It just needs a bit more time to play out. Even without her campaigning for a few days it's already started to turn around.
It's the cardinal sin of all campaigns: she told the truth, the real truth. Typically that's a bad thing to do, but this has been a atypical election so you may be right. Personally I hope you are.
I spoke to my mother yesterday and when I mentioned it she said, "no shit, but you don't say it." If that's going to be the general response it'll be fine.
p your toe in Turkeys public debate these days, and you will discover an ocean of conspiracy theorists. The media, a big chunk of which is devoted to supporting and praising President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is full of heated discussions explaining Turkeys every single trouble as a result of a heinous plot against the nation plots by the United States, the CIA, the British crown, the Zionists, or the interest rate lobby an alleged cabal that masters global capitalism.
These theories are diverse and colorful, and they purport to explain everything from terrorist attacks in Turkey to the Syrian civil war to economic stagnation. But they all fit into one dominant political narrative, which typically goes like this: Under Erdogans leadership, Turkey began to rise as a global power after a century of frailty. Since this New Turkey represents global justice for all the downtrodden, all the dark masters of the world are now alarmed by its glorious march. That is why they are using all their pawns against Turkey to defame, weaken, or destabilize it.