whyamihere
Banned
Man, these NH primaries are tiiiiight.
He'll just say he will sever all ties should he win, safe in the knowledge that he won't win, and that it won't be binding even if he did.
Man, these NH primaries are tiiiiight.
Channel your inner Carville my friendTighter than a 12 foot boat in a 6 foot dock. Tighter than a size 12 in a size 10 dress. Tighter than a rope on a snake's tail.
New York Governor Grover Cleveland narrowly defeated Republican former United States Senator James G. Blaine of Maine to break the longest losing streak for any major party in American political history: six consecutive presidential elections.
Yeah but if you have an instance where early ballots had Clinton's name and later ballots have Sanders' name on them, they don't just roll them all into one tally right?No, electors can vote for whoever they want. Hillary can pull a Horace Greeley and die between election day and when the electors vote if she wants to.
trying to steal candy from a vending machine? let me show you how it's done...cajun styleTighter than a 12 foot boat in a 6 foot dock. Tighter than a size 12 in a size 10 dress. Tighter than a rope on a snake's tail.
NX will plug one end into the TV and the other end into your butt
NX will plug one end into the TV and the other end into your butt
Go on....NX will plug one end into the TV and the other end into your butt
It's the thing at the beginning of an article that tells you what the story is and hooks you into reading it.What the hell is a nut graph?
Nah, NX is going to bomb.Finally, something to get excited about
There were only two Democratic Presidents from 1861 until 1933.SHESH. I didn't know R's had won the white house 12 out of 14 times between 1860-1912
The presidential election isn't decided by any of those votes. The electors decide it. And they're elected in each state and D.C. as a single slate. (Except Nebraska and Maine.) They'd still all be Democratic electors no matter whose name is next to the slate on the ballot. (In some states it still specifies that you're actually electing a slate of electors and not the person named.)Yeah but if you have an instance where early ballots had Clinton's name and later ballots have Sanders' name on them, they don't just roll them all into one tally right?
When Mondale stepped in for Wellstone in 2002 after Wellstone's death, they didn't add Wellstone's votes from absentee ballots to Mondale's total (not that this would have flipped the result, mind. Still one of the greatest tragedies of American politics, both Wellstone's death and that Coleman won it)
"See look, democrats poisoned your water, what have you got to lose?"Tump is going to Flint.
Okay.
There were only two Democratic Presidents from 1861 until 1933.
One of them was a top President, the other was a racist tyrant who established a totalitarian government that stomped on every civil liberty imaginable. Then his wife became President.
One of my all-time favorite episodes.trying to steal candy from a vending machine? let me show you how it's done...cajun style
Nah, NX is going to bomb.
Tump is going to Flint.
Okay.
Well, they did openly steal the 1876 election.<3
Also, didn't the Reps make it really difficult for Dems to win after the Civil War for a little while?
<3
Also, didn't the Reps make it really difficult for Dems to win after the Civil War for a little while?
jesus christ, people, it's fucking retromelon (no offense, retromelon)
Rachel is breaking the Newsweek story. She has the nut graph for it. Looks like it's a takedown of his company's foreign entanglements with foreign leaders, criminals and thugs.
Trump actually being corrupt doesn't matter because Clinton not actually being corrupt but the right wing and angry far left weirdos are convinced that she's corrupt without actual grounding in reality.
The A-rated charity engaged in improving global health is just as bad as the fake charity used as a cover to try and stave off prosecution.
The racist practices already revealed and flagrant actual lying by Trump doesn't matter because Clinton was once not a gay marriage proponent.
Welcome to the post factual world.
So something that is actually something but boring so will be treated like nothing.
They're saying he and his family *have* to sever ties with the Trump Org. or he'll be the most conflicted president in history. And with shady foreign entities. It's not nothing and it's not boring.
They're saying he and his family *have* to sever ties with the Trump Org. or he'll be the most conflicted president in history. And with shady foreign entities. It's not nothing and it's not boring.
What is going to stop Republicans from saying literally the same thing about Clinton and her time as SoS though? It's not nowhere the year but the surface details are there where they'll just handwave this shit away.They're saying he and his family *have* to sever ties with the Trump Org. or he'll be the most conflicted president in history. And with shady foreign entities. It's not nothing and it's not boring.
This was a major concern about Dole in 1996 and why the fruit company spun off its real estate arm.Thinking of the wouldn't the Trump org have to change it's name? Having the family name of a sitting president that is integral to that org's reputation seems like it would violate rules.
NX will plug one end into the TV and the other end into your butt
It will be treated like nothing though.They're saying he and his family *have* to sever ties with the Trump Org. or he'll be the most conflicted president in history. And with shady foreign entities. It's not nothing and it's not boring.
Back after a long day, another new I should be diablosing about?
The Newsweek story is useless at this point. The sky is blue. Water is wet. Trump is corrupt.
What's frustrating about it is that nobody thought to question THE OBVIOUS conflict of interest that is Trump's for-profit business dealings and what would happen to them should he become president, and instead chose to hound Clinton for weeks over a charity that has saved countless lives.
Shameful and disgusting.
Back after a long day, another new I should be diablosing about?