balladofwindfishes
Member
It's too bad I wasn't around PoliGaf to see this thread when this headline came out
"Romney opens up 7 point lead over Obama"
"Romney opens up 7 point lead over Obama"
It's too bad I wasn't around to see this thread when this headline came out
"Romney opens up 7 point lead over Obama"
Yup.At least the good thing is trump has never lead in literally 99% of the national polling aggregates or EV simulators. It's worrying that Hilary is not beating him by a considerable margin in national polls right now, but at the same time trump never seems to get enough momentum to lead nationally unlike Stephen Harper in last years federal election in Canada.
I agree.At least the good thing is trump has never lead in literally 99% of the national polling aggregates or EV simulators. It's worrying that Hilary is not beating him by a considerable margin in national polls right now, but at the same time trump never seems to get enough momentum to lead nationally unlike Stephen Harper in last years federal election in Canada.
This.I agree.
Clinton has let things get away from her, but not to a point where I think she's actually losing. If the election were held today I think her firewall would hold pretty well and she'd win a few states besides (NV, NC, FL).
I think she'll turn this around and open up a firm lead post-debates.
This.
Liberals don't really have experience playing with the big stack at the table, and it shows.
Clinton's campaign is being run by Obama's crew, with Obama's infrastructure.
Chiiiiil
Worst case, and I do mean worst case, Clinton is POTUS and they fail to take the senate.
Sidebar from the panicking (won't use that one term):
Ever since Bannon came on board, notice the lack of inside scuttlebutt? Either some leakers got fired, or got scared.
Also, Trump's been waaaay better about making attacks that land as opposed to casting about.
I think despite being a huge negative himself, Bannon can be credited for whatever success Trump is having right now. And I hate that.
https://www.google.com/search?q=playing+as+big+stack+poker&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8What does this even mean? Is it the 80s?
Ailes, Bannon, and Conway all came on at the same time so it's hard to tell which one made the difference.
Of course, all three are the worst people in the world.
Also guys, probably a good idea to stop saying "Diablos", as he repeated his dislike for us using that term last night.
The Wang said:The Presidential forecast [methods] takes a low-noise snapshot of state polls, then adds possible drift based on recent elections and this year. Because of intense polarization, few voters are movable. The calculation says that Clintons win probability is 90%. The Senate forecast does the same [methods], but also factors in Presidential-year or midterm-year bias. It says that Democrats+Independents probability of taking control is 72%, which is in the 20-80% range, meaning that things could really go either way. Other forecasts tend to count uncertainties twice, or to overestimate how movable voters are. Other forecasts are also under commercial pressure to attract eyeballs.
Still, the comment section is still peppered with anxious questions about Clintons chances. Honestly, some liberals can be total ninnies. You dont see the conservatives in hysterics though actually, here is their version of a meltdown. I take it back. You go.
When your opponent does 3 rallies a day it's an issue.
Wait, are we actually going "more rallies is better" after the constant belittling of Romney and Bernie?
What the hell are you guys on?
Okay that's probably enough of this thread for the day. See you guys after the debates.
I'm gonna guess Conway. I don't see those 2 guys keeping him quiet during the health days.
To above: i know the phrase. I don't get its meaning here. The party that won 4/6 of the last Presidentials does know how to play.
Trump's hatred of the environmental and farm regulations is just legendary:
He's a true Republican with this simply nuclear take.
I think Conway is just Surrogate Prime and doesn't really manage the campaign as such.
At least 2012 had chillthefuckoutIgotthis.jpg.this 2012 Poligaf thread must have people on suicide-watch.
I was pretty panicky too back then.
this 2012 Poligaf thread must have people on suicide-watch.
I was pretty panicky too back then.
I think people are on edge because the stakes in this election are the highest they've ever been in our life time. We're looking at potentially the single worst disaster of a presidency this country has ever had. On top of him winning validating white supremacists and setting back racial issues by generations. We're looking at people's lives being turned upside down. Their marriage invalidated. Their children taken away. There's also a unique opportunity this time around to really make a difference in the Supreme Court.
It's also hard to settle down from going from +8, and talking about hard red states being in play, to +2 with the potential to actually lose a couple swing states.
@ggreenwald 7m7 minutes ago
Glenn Greenwald Retweeted Asher Schechter
Right. It's the job of a party and candidate to convince people to support them. It's not an entitlement
Connor KilpatrickVerified account
‏@ckilpatrick
If you are not a millionaire and couldn't get behind Sanders, it's possible you're a spineless cretin with a dismal outlook on the world.
https://twitter.com/seanspicer/status/776442644637609984
The RNC is not condemning Trump Jr. making a Holocaust joke and is linking to it.