Officerrob
Banned
What if President Nieto announces he will pay for the wall?
Is he trying to sabotage his political career even further?
What if President Nieto announces he will pay for the wall?
The Daily Caller published a defense of Nazi ideology today.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/30/d...logy-professor-kevin-macdonald/#ixzz4IsiVEdiQ
This is the first semi-major right wing site other than Breitbart that has actually embraced Nazism and Nazis on Twitter were extremely excited by this.
There was really nothing that happened that would have caused the shift.
So it's either noise. Or the subsiding of the convention bump I guess.
Or door number 3, liberals are poo.
Is there one without the shirt?what
Is there one without the shirt?
what
Racist.How do you people survive with so much thirst.
Email stories.There was really nothing that happened that would have caused the shift.
So it's either noise. Or the subsiding of the convention bump I guess.
Or door number 3, liberals are poo.
It's honestly just permeated into the culture that she is untrustworthy, regardless of the truth.
You know what, though? Perhaps she should be doing more public things to make herself more likeable. She's clearly not doing enough right now. Maybe the lack of press conferences actually IS a problem.
Thank the gods for Trump, folks.
Whole thing is a clusterfuck filled with lies and shady tactics.The State Department says about 30 emails that may be related to the 2012 attack on U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya, are among the thousands of Hillary Clinton emails recovered during the FBI's recently closed investigation into her use of a private server.
Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta on Tuesday that an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton. The State Department's lawyer said it would need until the end of September to review the emails and redact potentially classified information before they are released.
Mehta questioned why it would take so long to release so few documents and urged that the process be sped up. He ordered the department to report to him in a week with more details about why the review process would take a full month.
Yup. A thousand times this. There's a reason I begged for him to be the nominee. On one hand, he's dredging-up a lot of nastiness that was bubbling under the surface of our society; it's a troubling consequence of his campaign. But on the other side of the equation - he was our most likely path to victory. We all know the stakes this year. We lose, and it's a tough slog for the next few decades.Thank the gods for Trump, folks.
You know what, though? Perhaps she should be doing more public things to make herself more likeable. She's clearly not doing enough right now. Maybe the lack of press conferences actually IS a problem.
I agree, less ads attacking Trump and more ads talking about her and her plans. Leave the attacks to the Super PAC.Well, she hasn't really done herself any favors. The way she and her campaign have been playing defense lately (actually defending The Clinton Foundation, a MUCH better answer to the email question) should have honestly started weeks ago. Until fairly recently she's let Trump and his surrogates attack her without much of a response, so it's no surprise her numbers continue to drop.
I was having this conversation with a coworker. At this point, I think the Clinton campaign has adequately made the case that Trump is dangerous, untrustworthy, racist, sexist, a fucking moron, etc.. Fatigue has started to set in, ESPECIALLY now that Trump has settled on the strategy of just mindlessly parroting every attack she launches at him, insuring that pretty much everything Hillary says about Trump at this point gets covered with a "Both sides!!!!" slant no matter how much sense that doesn't make (god, our media is awful), and Hillary gets blowback.
Trump cannot pivot at this point, so Hillary needs to. Start reminding people that there are good reasons to want to vote for her, and not just against Trump. Give us some more of that convention week hopium.
It's time to stop attacking Trump, the public gets it. Pivot to a more positive message because that's something Trump literally cannot do at this point. He has no positive message. The public wouldn't even believe it.
/armchair punditry
You know what, though? Perhaps she should be doing more public things to make herself more likeable. She's clearly not doing enough right now. Maybe the lack of press conferences actually IS a problem.
1) Everything, no matter how ludicrous-sounding, is worthy of a full investigation by federal agencies, Congress, the "vast right-wing conspiracy," and mainstream media outlets
2) Every allegation, no matter how ludicrous, is believable until it can be proven completely and utterly false. And even then, it keeps a life of its own in the conservative media world.
3) The media assumes that Clinton is acting in bad faith until there's hard evidence otherwise.
4) Everything is newsworthy because the Clintons are the equivalent of America's royal family
5) Everything she does is fake and calculated for maximum political benefit
I take a dim view of the idea that journalists successfully anoint political winners. The media might have been in the bag for Barack Obama, but he didn't win because he got positive coverage. He won because he had better strategy, a better message, and better skills at delivering that message — in the 2008 primary and in the two general elections he won.
That said, the media can definitely weigh down — and even destroy — a candidate. The emphasis on a candidate's flaws — real or perceived — comes at the cost of the candidate's ability to focus his or her message and at the cost of negative attention to the other candidates. This is a problem for Clinton, and it seems unlikely to go away.
Hillary Clinton is comfortable enough to be a target for a lot of journalistic affliction and powerful enough that no one needs to comfort her from that affliction. But these double standards are an important factor to keep in mind when judging her against her rivals for the presidency. Whether they're fair or not, the Clinton rules distort the public's perception of Hillary Clinton.
Cynicism is a significant factor these days. I believe people are getting dumber and their time and effort put forth to understand things gets smaller, while their need to feel smarter is growing. Cynicism addresses all of that- it makes people feel smarter and requires no understanding, and reinforcing cynicism only requires the time to skim headlines. It's also very difficult to argue or discuss politics with cynical people, it's easier and more reassuring to just be cynical yourself and feel more in tune with others.
Thank the gods for Trump, folks.
Yeah definitely! Really has me worried about 2020, though :/
No, re-read this 1000 times
http://www.vox.com/2015/7/6/8900143/hillary-clinton-reporting-rules
I feel this is a big thing, people are so damn cynical on the internet it makes it exhausting for someone who aren't.
Whoa, she also dropped 16 points with Hispanics.
Let's wait and see if this poll is an outlier or the real deal.
Did WaPo commission the poll too?Are you guys talking about the 66% Hillary, 20% Trump Hispanic poll I just saw on tv? Jumped out at me too
I have no idea...saw it on fox news. Yes I watch Foxnews.Did WaPo commission the poll too?
You know what, though? Perhaps she should be doing more public things to make herself more likeable. She's clearly not doing enough right now. Maybe the lack of press conferences actually IS a problem.
Are you guys talking about the 66% Hillary, 20% Trump Hispanic poll I just saw on tv? Jumped out at me too
Maybe she should go visit the Pope.....
What a candidatehttp://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-30-clinton-emails-20160830-snap-story.html
Whole thing is a clusterfuck filled with lies and shady tactics.
Nobody gives a shit about press conferences other than the press.
Okay. The Press, and you for some reason.Wrong.