BlastProcessing
Member
I'm actually not sure I agree. College was the time in my life where I was presented with the largest number of people coming from the largest number of places with the most diversity of background along every conceivable axis.
I know everyone isn't going to have the same college experience-- and, without being glib, perhaps going to University of Bumfuck at Little Rock is not going to give you the same experience-- I think that sort of newness, of difference, and of disputatious learning IS sort of universal and essential to the beings of people who go to college vs. those who don't.
This is an incredible generality. There are twats at college. There are incredibly worldly, secular people who do not go to college. But on average, just being in an uncomfortable and challenging place really does shape people differently than, for example, not. I'm relatively comfortable making this argument without data to support it but I would be really surprised if it were not true on average.
I agree we are getting into generalities here and I would agree with your depiction of how the diversity of the college experience is a positive, but I would say that one of the reasons that the college experience is what it is, is because of the type of people who end up attending. I think the causality is a little inverted.
As colleges have become more and more expensive, we have seen them become more and more liberal. There used to be plenty of Universities that had a conservative reputation. Over the last 50 years or so that has changed pretty drastically. If the college system got a massive influx of students from a free college for everyone initiative, I think the college's themselves would quickly evolve into something different.