whyamihere
Banned
27 days until this nightmare is over.
And if there is proof of physical resistance and subsequent injury - which there shouldn't even have to be - the argument morphs into "well, she didn't resist enough [because she was still raped]""HEY SHE DIDN'T RESIST"
that's basically the argument.
its so sick.
27 days until this nightmare is over.
You wants reporters to investigate the sources of other reporters and other media organizations? Good luck with that.
Why would the Clinton campaign release this story from its communication team? It would lose legitimacy coming directly from the campaign. There's no physical evidence, unlike the Machado story.
how
do
you
have
a
log
in
your
eye
Said without a hint of irony...
how
do
you
have
a
log
in
your
eye
27 days until this nightmare is over.
27 days until this nightmare is over.
27 days until this nightmare is over.
I just saw a clip of Trump saying, "Wikileaks - I love Wikileaks" and the crowd around him cheered. LOL! So Republicans now like Wikileads? Jesus Christ. Can these fucking people decide on whom they like and whom they don't?
Or it could just be the beginning if Trump wins...
It's going to be the longest 27 days of our lives though.
27 days until this nightmare is over.
27 days until this nightmare is over.
Summary of all the allegations of the last 24hrs
All of this stuff is Trump when he's losing. I'm more concerned about what he does once he loses.
I like Primary Concerns, the New Republic's podcast.Btw, I've been listening to Woocast all day thanks to the recommendation of a GAFer. Are there any other good ones out there?
They like "things Trump says". Doesn't matter what he says, they applaud automatically.
"I hate all of you"
*applause*
"Big dashing fish flop purple smock"
*applause*
"I don't really want to win, I'm trying to tank my campaign on purpose"
*applause*
etc
All of this stuff is Trump when he's losing. I'm more concerned about what he does once he loses.
They like "things Trump says". Doesn't matter what he says, they applaud automatically.
"I hate all of you"
*applause*
"Big dashing fish flop purple smock"
*applause*
"I don't really want to win, I'm trying to tank my campaign on purpose"
*applause*
etc
If we're lucky, he'll end up embroiled in the Titanic's worth of personal scandals and fraud charges he brought on himself by running for president. It will be the most satisfying schadenfreude in all of post WWII [American political] history.
The proper conclusion would be him being in jail for sexual assault but i have doubts there's any out there that's provable in court beyond a reasonable doubt.
At least his businesses are taking a huge hit.
Huh? I didn't say any of that. I want Cooper to mention that there's no evidence the Clinton campaign has been involved in any of this stuff coming out against Trump when his surrogates claim that this is just a distraction by the "opposition" to avoid the issues. It's a completely hypocritical excuse. That's it.
"I think BLM brings up important issues."
*crickets*
Lock him up.
Starting to look like Podesta is just a big fucking idiot who doesn't understand technology despite his position. The guy e-mailed his apple login and password openly to other people.
LMFAOOO
Does anyone know why the fuck the whack jobs on my wall are claiming wikileaks proves Clinton doesn't support gay marriage? I've seen literally nothing, and I don't want to engage them on this nonsense.
Summary of all the allegations of the last 24hrs
Starting to look like Podesta is just a big fucking idiot who doesn't understand technology despite his position. The guy e-mailed his apple login and password openly to other people.
I'm starting to feel bad for Podesta.
They're tweeting as many false claims as possible without even reading the emails in the hopes something sticks.
Clinton campaign shouldn't have responded to this. Just let it play out.
Not sure the Clinton campaign should be releasing a statement, just should have sat back and let this roll
Does anyone know why the fuck the whack jobs on my wall are claiming wikileaks proves Clinton doesn't support gay marriage? I've seen literally nothing, and I don't want to engage them on this nonsense.
I’m not saying double down or ever say it again. I’m just saying that she’s not going to want to say she was wrong about that, given she and her husband believe it and have repeated it many times. Better to reiterate evolution, opposition to DOMA when court considered it, and forward looking stance
The most recent Blade article has Elizabeth Birch quoted as saying there was no amendment threat in 1996. Hilary Rosen has already tweeted the same. I'll ask on the call, but my sense is that there aren't many friends who will back us up on the point. That's why I'm urging us to back off as much as we can there.