“Were we so concerned about the hours and hours and hours spent on the golf course by the current president?” she said on CNN, in reference to President Barack Obama. “I mean, presidents have a right to do things in their spare time or their leisure time. I mean nobody objects to that.”
Presidents don't work second jobs and his actions could be seen as a conflict of interest given his powers. Are we really supposed to believe that he won't take action to benefit himself businesswise while acting as president?
If there are only a few nominations that we should really pick a fight over, who should be the ones under the microscope?
If there are only a few nominations that we should really pick a fight over, who should be the ones under the microscope?
Romney, Guiliani, Betrayus in running for SoS
Putin publicly says no Romney
Trump picks out friend of Putin
We are really just going to roll over for this shit
I know which ones NOT to spend time on: Mattis, McMahon and Chao. Munchin and Sessions would also be a waste of time.
HHS and EPA will definitely be a battle.
In a way, it's a shame because he's probably one of the most competent picks.Mattis should absolutely be challenged. Civilian control of the military is a rather important concept. There's a reason he needs a waiver in order to take that seat.
In a way, it's a shame because he's probably one of the most competent picks.
Anyone else think Trump is just nominating a ridiculous candidate in hopes that people will think the actual candidate is less bad a result? (ie. at least X isn't Rex Tillerson!)
Though I think he'll be in for a rude awakening if that's the case. Government is different than business. Ugly fights with Congress aren't going to go in his favor - not with his dismal popularity.
I would hope their strategy is choosing who they think could potentially cause the most significant damage, either from incompetence or beliefs.I mean, we should fight the waiver for sure. But if he gets it there's not much of an argument against him at that point.
It's just that every single appointment Trump's made is an issue and how they hell do you fight them all?
I would hope their strategy is choosing who they think could potentially cause the most significant damage, either from incompetence or beliefs.
Some are definitely worse than others. I'm not saying it's an easy choice but being too obstructive will likely backfire since Trump is so good at broadcasting his message.That's still, like, all of them.
I don't think Trump would intentionally lose a nomination fight with Congress to make his next nominee look better, no. I don't think Trump would intentionally lose when playing a board game with a small child.
2) This is an exercise in patience when it comes to registered Ds who vote R.
I get that, but I don't see the pragmatic benefits of doing everything to stop him/embarrass him, especially since he could be one of the decent members of the Cabinet.Mattis should absolutely be challenged. Civilian control of the military is a rather important concept. There's a reason he needs a waiver in order to take that seat.
I get that, but I don't see the pragmatic benefits of doing everything to stop him/embarrass him, especially since he could be one of the decent members of the Cabinet.
It's a wrong battle to fight and one the Dems won't win.
So Joe Walsh's twitter feed is an interesting read.
You talking to Cajuns?2) This is an exercise in patience when it comes to registered Ds who vote R.
You talking to Cajuns?
Even if Trump is thinking in terms of how he runs his business? i.e. ask for the moon, "settle" for less.
(Again, I think government is different than business. Trump most assuredly does not realize this)
What's 30/30?I chose to do landlines to get older whites because I know we need to do the 30/30 strategy.
30% white support, 30% African-American turnout.What's 30/30?
I honestly believe Romney did it for earnest reasons. To try to have some sanity in the room. Romney did the right thing in meeting with Trump.lol @ Mitt. Trump played him like the chump that he is. Made him grovel like that spineless coward that he is.
I honestly believe Romney did it for earnest reasons. To try to have some sanity in the room. Romney did the right thing in meeting with Trump.
Same reason Gore met to talk climate change. You do what you can.
I honestly believe Romney did it for earnest reasons. To try to have some sanity in the room. Romney did the right thing in meeting with Trump.
Same reason Gore met to talk climate change. You do what you can.
I'm not into the torture porn genre of horror.Who watched the Vice special on what a shit show congress was during Obama's presidency? Fuck The Tea Party.
I honestly believe Romney did it for earnest reasons. To try to have some sanity in the room. Romney did the right thing in meeting with Trump.
Same reason Gore met to talk climate change. You do what you can.
This is an even worst situation that I imagined, truly scary times we are living. Democrats can't be going gently into the night.
Obama, is necessary to put Garland or an equally qualified liberal on the Supreme court, this is key to fight back on gerrymandering. Stop cooperation with the transition team and create some blind cell in the CIA to investigate if president Trump is a Russian asset with sufficient freedom.
This isn't an usual situation, tradition isn't worth enabling these criminals.
This is an even worst situation that I imagined, truly scary times we are living. Democrats can't be going gently into the night.
Obama, is necessary to put Garland or an equally qualified liberal on the Supreme court, this is key to fight back on gerrymandering. Stop cooperation with the transition team and create some blind cell in the CIA to investigate if president Trump is a Russian asset with sufficient freedom.
This isn't an usual situation, tradition isn't worth enabling these criminals.
Obama recording robocalls for Foster is interesting.
I watched it last night on a whim. Frank Luntz lamenting about how he played a part in that had me nearly pulling my hair out. God damn it.Who watched the Vice special on what a shit show congress was during Obama's presidency? Fuck The Tea Party.
I know which ones NOT to spend time on: Mattis, McMahon and Chao. Munchin and Sessions would also be a waste of time.
HHS and EPA will definitely be a battle.
No. We should try to aggravate Trump at every opportunity. We cannot reason with him, Gore, Obama, Hillary, Mittens, the press, even DiCaprio. That didn't work. The opposite now is the only option. We need to force him to self destruct. If you can't beat something, maybe driving it to beat himself is the most viable strategy. The same extends to the GOP and the Tea Party.I hate to say this but Obama should just play nice with trump until trump gets sworn in and then fight against him unless something explosive pops up between now and january 20th. I do agree that the democrats should fight against any gerrymandering the republicans try in the future. I do expect the gerrymandering to backfire against republicans in the future.
We tried baiting him into self-destructing before the election. His "self-destructions" ended up doing nothing to harm him.No. We should try to aggravate Trump at every opportunity. We cannot reason with him, Gore, Obama, Hillary, Mittens, the press, even DiCaprio. That didn't work. The opposite now is the only option. We need to force him to self destruct. If you can't beat something, maybe driving it to beat himself is the most viable strategy. The same extends to the GOP and the Tea Party.
We shouldn't be here thinking on how we can work with them. That's too fucking nice. We need to consider how we can enable them to self destruct in the short term in order to have a future at all.
We tried baiting him into self-destructing before the election. His "self-destructions" ended up doing nothing to harm him.
No. We should try to aggravate Trump at every opportunity. We cannot reason with him, Gore, Obama, Hillary, Mittens, the press, even DiCaprio. That didn't work. The opposite now is the only option. We need to force him to self destruct. If you can't beat something, maybe driving it to beat himself is the most viable strategy. The same extends to the GOP and the Tea Party.
We shouldn't be here thinking on how we can work with them. That's too fucking nice. We need to consider how we can enable them to self destruct in the short term in order to have a future at all.
I watched it last night on a whim. Frank Luntz lamenting about how he played a part in that had me nearly pulling my hair out. God damn it.