DataStream
Member
Impossible but hilarious situation, both conventions are contested and the end result is mittens vs uncle Joe
Anyone put money into the brokered convention market? It's rising on all the sites.
-----
First on CNN: Team Romney explores blocking Trump at RNC
Romney vs. Obama vs. Trump vs. Clinton on the trail again? mm
Wait, what there's a Democratic debate on the 6th and then one 3 days on the 9th?
Bizarre scheduling. Seems pointless having them so close.
hilldawg.com officially more secure than state.govWASHINGTON A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clintons private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clintons emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clintons assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments. The former aide, Bryan Pagliano, began cooperating with federal agents last fall, according to interviews with a federal law enforcement official and others close to the case. Mr. Pagliano described how he set up the server in Mrs. Clintons home in Chappaqua, N.Y., and according to two of the people, he provided agents the security logs. The law enforcement official described the interview as routine. Most of those close to the case spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the continuing investigation.
Eh, gives her some practise for when the GOP starts pulling that shit. I'm OK with Sanders doing his thing untilsomeoneTrump mathematically locks up the nomination, when that happens hopefully he to suspend his campaign, gives a 'VOTE 4 KWEEN' speech and start stumping for Senate races.
Anyone put money into the brokered convention market? It's rising on all the sites.
I.. I think I'd be okay with this. Uncle Joe would rout Mitt. Mitt would end-up consoling himself with a gallon of Blue Bell and a second car elevator.Impossible but hilarious situation, both conventions are contested and the end result is mittens vs uncle Joe
Anyone put money into the brokered convention market? It's rising on all the sites.
-----
First on CNN: Team Romney explores blocking Trump at RNC
Romney vs. Obama vs. Trump vs. Clinton on the trail again? mm
Delusional talk that is going to backfire lol. First it only reinforces the reason so many support Trump: he's not a part of the establishment and the establishment wants to stop him from becoming president/firing them. Second...if it works the RNC will have essentially disenfranchised millions of voters by telling them "too bad, we're going to give the nomination to someone else instead." Of course it won't work.Anyone put money into the brokered convention market? It's rising on all the sites.
-----
First on CNN: Team Romney explores blocking Trump at RNC
Romney vs. Obama vs. Trump vs. Clinton on the trail again? mm
Anyone put money into the brokered convention market? It's rising on all the sites.
-----
First on CNN: Team Romney explores blocking Trump at RNC
Romney vs. Obama vs. Trump vs. Clinton on the trail again? mm
Sure he is. Sanders' followers didn't just come up with their"no true Scotsman" standards for progressives on their own. Sanders has been beating this drum for literally decades. Nothing short of a purely socialist platform built entirely upon is ideologies is acceptable. There is no compromise on ideology. Pragmatism is a vice.
He's a politician because in Sanders' world view everyone should be employed by the government. He only cooperates with people when it entirely suits his interests, like working with the DNC when they wanted a win in Vermont for the 2005-2006 midterms.
This is who Bernie Sanders has always been. He is, in almost every way, the left's version of what Donald Trump has been campaigning as on the right. I don't think that is really Donald Trump, but this is really Bernie Sanders.
I don't see where anyone is going over the top. Sanders is playing out the last of his hand and, to keep the card analogy going, we're just calling a spade a spade.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html
hilldawg.com officially more secure than state.gov
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html
hilldawg.com officially more secure than state.gov
But with the numbers he's bringing in, what difference does it make?? Do they actually think Rubio and Cruz are national worthy?
My big concern is that he's effectively teeing up their attacks for them. Some anonymous SuperPAC with a name like "Freedom Cooperative for America" or something starts running ads saying "Senator Sanders said X about Hillary Clinton. Can you really trust her?"
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html
hilldawg.com officially more secure than state.gov
People are under the impression that if she had been using a state.gov email, also unclassified, for her day-to-day work business none of this would be occurring. It would still be occurring. The people sending these emails are doing so via unclassified state.gov accounts.HNNNNNNNGH.
Regardless of legal minutiae, I've always thought the security angle was a weak argument against Hillary considering how insecure and porous federal agencies server's have been.
Under Clintons proposal, the top 1 percent of earners would pay for three quarters of the revenue gains, according to the analysis from the non-partisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
The analysis found the plan would have little impact on the overall size of the economy, but the federal debt would decline by around $1.2 trillion over a decade as a result of the revenue increases
The former secretary of State has also proposed a set of new, higher rates on investment income and a tax on high-frequency stock trades, which proponents argue would raise needed revenue while making the stock market more efficient by discouraging high-frequency trading practices.
Those higher rates and new rules would discourage wealthy taxpayers from investing aggressively and would drive up the cost of borrowing, according to the analysis.
New higher tax rates could also drive down the labor supply, particularly among second-earners like spouses who tend to be more sensitive to tax rates when considering whether to work.
At this point it seems like the RNC is actively trying to split the party. I can't think of another reason why they'd think people would take to Romney.
At this point it seems like the RNC is actively trying to split the party. I can't think of another reason why they'd think people would take to Romney.
At this point it seems like the RNC is actively trying to split the party. I can't think of another reason why they'd think people would take to Romney.
As that guy in the crowd said: "You're desperate!"At this point it seems like the RNC is actively trying to split the party. I can't think of another reason why they'd think people would take to Romney.
I think they want to force Trump out and make him run independent while the GOP savior Romney will come to the defense of downticket ballots. Thats the only thing that makes sense right now.At this point it seems like the RNC is actively trying to split the party. I can't think of another reason why they'd think people would take to Romney.
There's probably no unified vision from the RNC at this point, Romney probably did this on his own.
The GOP stopped having a unified vision November of 2008.
Even though the party controls a good bit of state governorships and legislatures, considering that there are two (possibly three) factions in the party warring for ultimate control, all of those wins are for naught.
What is his actual goal here??
I'm all for Bernie staying in and pushing his message. When he breaks-out the GOP attacks though...
I think they want to force Trump out and make him run independent while the GOP savior Romney will come to the defense of downticket ballots. Thats the only thing that makes sense right now.
What are the chances this passes?
!!!People are under the impression that if she had been using a state.gov email, also unclassified, for her day-to-day work business none of this would be occurring. It would still be occurring. The people sending these emails are doing so via unclassified state.gov accounts.
She had other government channels set up for receiving information marked classified.
And they're unaware that the State Department's unclassified state.gov system has been hacked.
There are two separate problems here and conflated in that:
The State Department didn't really have any rules preventing the use of private email for government business; which in retrospect it has decided it should. Mainly because they're records for FOIA requests.
And classification is seemingly a clusterfuck.
What are the chances this passes?
I agree. At this point, they know they're not going to win with Trump at the top of the ticket. It's not going to happen. They have no way to game the remaining primaries to ensure a win for Rubio. His numbers on Super Tuesday ensured that.
So, they push for a brokered convention. If they steal it from Trump, they cannot, I wouldn't think, give it to Rubio. That is immediately obvious, and wouldn't work at all. It would be seen for what it was, and then we could hit them on it.
So, they need an elder statesman who can come out and say "I had nothing to do with this. I just want to help the party." Rmoney fits that bill, well enough.
Trump then goes 3rd party, and the GOP loses to the Queen as has been ordained. You maybe have the chance of saving some down ballot people with this strategy.
I agree. At this point, they know they're not going to win with Trump at the top of the ticket. It's not going to happen. They have no way to game the remaining primaries to ensure a win for Rubio. His numbers on Super Tuesday ensured that.
So, they push for a brokered convention. If they steal it from Trump, they cannot, I wouldn't think, give it to Rubio. That is immediately obvious, and wouldn't work at all. It would be seen for what it was, and then we could hit them on it.
So, they need an elder statesman who can come out and say "I had nothing to do with this. I just want to help the party." Rmoney fits that bill, well enough.
Trump then goes 3rd party, and the GOP loses to the Queen as has been ordained. You maybe have the chance of saving some down ballot people with this strategy.
The big question is in the event that the GOP fails to stop Trump, will there be a splinter 3rd party bid? Or does everyone fall in line? And how does that effect downballot republicans who are going to be constantly asked who they endorse for president?
Long time no seeCouldn't Trump threaten to start his own third party and run candidates for every house and Senate seat in response?
Couldn't Trump threaten to start his own third party and run candidates for every house and Senate seat in response?
I don't think that Rmoney could beat Hillary in a fair fight, Trump or not.
Couldn't Trump threaten to start his own third party and run candidates for every house and Senate seat in response?
Couldn't Trump threaten to start his own third party and run candidates for every house and Senate seat in response?