User 463088
Banned
It was much funnier when it was Scott Walker and a giant Koch brothers check
Now it's Donald Trump with a giant koch.
It was much funnier when it was Scott Walker and a giant Koch brothers check
This also doesn't make sense to me personally. If Bernie were to win the nom. would Hillary supporters who have been attacking Bernie ones with this claim that they won't vote if Hillary gets the nom. suddenly not vote instead? The guy was and still is polling fine in terms of perceived electibility last I knew. Democrats who refuse to rally behind whoever the Democrat nom. is, especially since they're still somewhat similar on most matters, probably didn't care in the first place about the issues and only wanted their candidate in. The two are different on the issues in some manners, hence my support for Bernie and in the end if I have to settle with Hillary's more status quo-style of approach to things, I will have to. I'd like to assume Hillary ones would behave in the same way and not be hypocritical on this front.
Clinton and Sanders are walking right into a trap.
Just saw my first Kasich ad here in Ohio. It was asking Ohioans to "loan him" to Washington. We can loan him to the moon as far as I'm concerned...
Mostly this is not the concern. This is just about median voter stuff. So, assume that we can situate everybody on one political axis and that voters go for the candidate closest to them (obviously it's more complicated than this but this is easy to visualize). Sanders is to the left of Clinton - that's a lot of why his supporters like him! There are a group of voters who are to Clinton's right but to the left of the eventual Republican nominee. Some of these voters - the ones who are just barely closer to Clinton than the Republican - will vote for Clinton over the Republican but will vote for the Republican over Sanders. Therefore Sanders expects fewer votes than Clinton against a given Republican. This isn't about strong Clinton supporters deciding to let the country burn if they can't get their woman. This is about people totally rationally, given their preferences, switching parties because Sanders is too far left for them.This also doesn't make sense to me personally. If Bernie were to win the nom. would Hillary supporters who have been attacking Bernie ones with this claim that they won't vote if Hillary gets the nom. suddenly not vote instead? The guy was and still is polling fine in terms of perceived electibility last I knew. Democrats who refuse to rally behind whoever the Democrat nom. is, especially since they're still somewhat similar on most matters, probably didn't care in the first place about the issues and only wanted their candidate in. The two are different on the issues in some manners, hence my support for Bernie and in the end if I have to settle with Hillary's more status quo-style of approach to things, I will have to. I'd like to assume Hillary ones would behave in the same way and not be hypocritical on this front.
I'm watching House of Cards Season 4 and it's much less entertaining than the real Republican primary.
MIT has developed an artificially intelligent Donald Trump which it says can independently tweet more or less the same sort of nonsense as the real thing.
Developed by a researcher at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, the AI Trump is able to come up with "remarkably Trump-like statements" all without human intervention.
Rubio has no organization in Florida somehow:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/rubio-scrambles-to-undo-trump-in-florida-220243
It's over. Trump is the nominee.
Now it's Donald Trump with a giant koch.
I will stop Iran from getting Rubio.they got come in third and will call me a disaster.I tell you thats going to be destroyed.look at that
I will find the donors on the process, because our leaders dont understand the good ones. I have them all, all the strong,incredible people
Big Don flips on torture.
Today has been so boring compared to the epic shitshow that was yesterday.
Holy shit, DeepDrumpf is amazing
I think Huelen's coming around, too. Massive numbers of Democrats are moving to the Republican party this year so it makes sense.
Tesseract is already pivoting to Trump, I expect at least half the Bernie stans to follow suit.
kansas is so conservative it a wonder Sebelius made it in there in 2002. Kansas will elect someone just as conservative as Brownback. Democrats have no chance there.
Sanders' plan to win the Democratic nomination is to run against the two former, popular Democratic presidents. Who's next, Jimmy?
Looking around, it certainly seems possible. The job switches parties a lot. You'll most likely need some sort of blue dog, evidently, but given how popular brownback is, democrats certainly have a chance.
No he's not.Well, he's running against the entire Democratic party so.....
I saw this while I was out on a jog tonight. I have this perception of Boise as being this beautiful progressive oasis in the desert of right wing nuttery that is Idaho, and usually I can't go a day or two without something shattering that perception.
Well, Brownback was also a disaster in 2014, and somehow, they still re-elected him.
Two years earlier, according to national exit polls, Latinos voted for President Barack Obama 71 percent to 27 percent over Republican Mitt Romney.
But Kansas Democratic Party officials said after the 2014 races they did not invest many resources into trying to register Latino voters, nor in reaching out through Spanish-language campaign literature, assuming that the state's new photo ID and proof of citizenship voting laws would reduce the effectiveness of those efforts.
The result, according to 2014 exit polls in Kansas, was that Latino voters split almost evenly, with 47 percent supporting Republican Gov. Sam Brownback and 46 percent voting for Davis.
Brownback got booed as he introduced Rubio today, lol.
Kansas lost 4k jobs in January according to the report today.
Is he a Bernie Sanders endorsee?
I know I have said it before, but there are some hispanics, even Mexican Americans, who are voting Trump in a general if Hilary gets it solely for the reason of him not being a woman.I saw a lanky Mexican gentleman wearing a Confederate flag cap here in Northern, Almost-Wisconsin Illinois today, while I was at work. Life is weird.
They have a special on msnbc detailing David Duke's history.
I knew he was a piece of shit, but goddamn I didn't know how much
And yet he was using GOP talking points way back in 1989
It wasn't a special, just a segment on Chris Hayes' show.
I know I have said it before, but there are some hispanics, even Mexican Americans, who are voting Trump in a general if Hilary gets it solely for the reason of him not being a woman.
It's sad and sexist, but not unheard of.
he running against DWS.
Sort of wish he was still in the race to get this thrown at him every debateBobby Jindal should probably never work anywhere again.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...mic-disaster-louisianas-governor-left-behind/
Damn Kevin Alexander Grey on MSNBC saying what I been saying for months
and that is?
Cornell West was a mistake.
I really do not like that man.
Well, bumps ahead.I saw this while I was out on a jog tonight. I have this perception of Boise as being this beautiful progressive oasis in the desert of right wing nuttery that is Idaho, and usually I can't go a day or two without something shattering that perception.
Yeah! I thought that sign was appropriate.Well, bumps ahead.