I heard an
interesting article on NPR this morning, where minister and Trump fan
James Linzey was interviewed about why evangelicals are supporting Trump considering that, you know,
he's practically the walking embodiment of the seven deadly sins.
I thought the interview was a hysterical exercise in cognitive dissonance. Linzey condemns Cruz as a hypocrite (which, okay, sure) whose "religious talk is just for show" and explains that he backs Trump because "he's not a bought man and he means what he says when he lays out his policies", i.e. securing the borders and kicking out immigrants. Linzey then declares he's not voting for someone based on what their faith is, which I thought was amusing coming from someone who wrote a book called
A Divine Appointment in Washington D.C.. He also dismisses Trump owning, say, a casino with a strip club in it as just business because, hey, business is business.
Probably the key moment is when NPR mentions Trump's pro-choice past, to which Linzey immediately declares that he only cares what Trump believes right now and that people can change and that shows growth - but, that when Mitt Romney says mean things about Trump, that's hypocrisy and that Mittens has thrown away his moral values. All of which is to say that I imagine we can look forward to many evangelicals, such as
Two Falwell, cheerfully endorsing Trump because he'll make America great again and that any abrupt changes or conflicts in ideology are fine so long as he's
sufficiently born again politically. Not that this sort of disconnect is new or surprising.
Since I'm not exactly up on my evangelical figures, I wondered who Jim Linzey was and found
an expose from a religious right watchdog website that helped clear up where Linzey is coming from:
Also:
Ah. Now Linzey's support of Trump makes perfect sense.
FnordChan