That's a meaningless requirement, they'll change it in July just liked they changed it to the current rule to block Ron Paul.
Yep, get your popcorn ready people.
The implosion of the GOP is going to be jawdropping.
That's a meaningless requirement, they'll change it in July just liked they changed it to the current rule to block Ron Paul.
They can change this rule midstream. And obviously the rule would not apply if they pick someone totally new.The power of Voter ID laws and Democrats not showing up to midterm elections.
Currently the RNC requires a nominee to win the majority of delegates in 8 states, which means Rubio and Kasich might not even meet minimum requirements.
What odes it mean to "Diablosing"?
Cruz is the candidate the democrats want. Trump isn't that far behind I guess but he's such an unpredictable wild card that it makes him less desirable to campaign against.So who's seen as being the easiest to beat in November with Hillary as the nominee?
Takeaway from the Trump campaign. People are still animals. At the end of the day our hard wired responses to alpha displays of power and loyalty to the tribe outweigh all the other window dressing. Or, at least can, in the right circumstances.I heard an interesting article on NPR this morning, where minister and Trump fan James Linzey was interviewed about why evangelicals are supporting Trump considering that, you know, he's practically the walking embodiment of the seven deadly sins.
I'm impressed at how many delegates he got over her in caucus states. Should ban those, debbie.
Little Marco is going to win Puerto Rico on Sunday though
I CANT BELIEVE THERE IS ANOTHERRRRR DEBATE
The Mississippi House went from 67 Democrats and 55 Republicans in 2011 to 74 Republicans and 48 Democrats this year. Ouch.
Why have there been no Trump like politicians that have attempted primary challenges?
FUCK!!!!!1one!!from one Maine caucus county - Waldo
Cruz 49.8%
Trump 30.8%
Kasich 10.5%
Rubio 7.6%
http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/results/2016/primary/gop/president/maine/
from one Maine caucus county - Waldo
Cruz 49.8%
Trump 30.8%
Kasich 10.5%
Rubio 7.6%
http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/results/2016/primary/gop/president/maine/
from one Maine caucus county - Waldo
Cruz 49.8%
Trump 30.8%
Kasich 10.5%
Rubio 7.6%
http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/results/2016/primary/gop/president/maine/
Where's Waldo county tho?from one Maine caucus county - Waldo
Cruz 49.8%
Trump 30.8%
Kasich 10.5%
Rubio 7.6%
http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/results/2016/primary/gop/president/maine/
Needs firmware upgradehttps://twitter.com/dick_nixon/status/696175149423452160
(This Twitter account is amazing at figuring out what dog whistles Nixon would use against various candidates).
Woah, missed this story:
http://time.com/4226872/marco-rubio...ign=Feed:+time/topstories+(TIME:+Top+Stories)
Oh my god this intro on CNN.
Have u missed the CNN debate (read super bowl) intros?Oh my god this intro on CNN.
Currently the RNC requires a nominee to win the majority of delegates in 8 states, which means Rubio and Kasich might not even meet minimum requirements.
Why the hell does CNN keep trying to push record turnout reporting at these sites for both parties when it's clear Democrats are not experiencing it.
About seven years ago I tried to do a paper regarding predicting county level results based on demographic changes and collecting the data past basically the Presidential level was insufferable.A friend of mine is doing his dissertation on the rapid acceleration of partisan sorting in the South over the last 10 years. This story is repeated in virtually every state, and not just at the election level--also at the candidate recruitment and local resources level. Democrats had hundred year old political machines at the county level that have rapidly been surpassed over the last few years. To some extent, the sorting was a process that was occurring anyway (witness all these same states voting Republican at the Presidential level back to the Nixon era even as they retained conservative Democrats at the lower level--it's just taken time for people to resolve their own partisan incoherence). But there's evidence to suggest that Obama's election sped this up, mostly on the dimension of racial resentment.
Unfortunately no one cares about state legislatures so this is not a process that's been studied very well either in terms of qualitative field-work or quantitative statistical analyses.
So Cruz has all but won Maine.
So Cruz has all but won Maine.
I can't tell if you're kidding or not...Looks like it.
Benji, if you could read the part of my post that talks about unemployment in mississippi it would reasonably follow that the time frame we're talking about is five or ten years here.Define "long time."
The Governor has been a Republican for 24 of the last 28 years. The State Senate has been Republican for eight of the last eleven years. The State House has been Republican for the last four years.
why is cruz doing well in Maine?
Seems to be picking up a lot of Ron Paul voters (which he almost won in 2012 against Romney).why is cruz doing well in Maine?
So Cruz has all but won Maine.
It's looking like Clinton won absentee voting decisively and Sanders is winning caucus day voting. Sanders will win though.Wait a minute. Nebraska allows absentee ballots for the caucus. So either spend hours of your Saturday standing around at a caucus, or just mail in a ballot and be done with it.
I'm hearing Hillary had a surprisingly strong showing of absentee ballots.
I'd find it hilarious if absentee ballots had any significant effect on the results.
Wait a minute. Nebraska allows absentee ballots for the caucus. So either spend hours of your Saturday standing around at a caucus, or just mail in a ballot and be done with it.
I'm hearing Hillary had a surprisingly strong showing of absentee ballots.
I'd find it hilarious if absentee ballots had any significant effect on the results.