Right it's not about policy - except for the instances where she is challenged on her commitment to environmental issues. Do you honestly want me to start posting articles of climate scientists, environmental advocates and activists challenging her policy because I can.
YES, because that would be a substantive case to make, instead of this bullshit "B-b-but money!" argument that really tells you nothing about a candidate. This is a lazy and damn dishonest way to smear a candidate. Show actual proof that Hillary isn't committed to the environment.
Also, contributions to Hillary's campaigns and PACs from the Fossil Fuel industry are low, and Sanders' own campaign is guilty of receiving their contributions as well.