You mean Obama's not being criticized for the same thing now, or back then, or by the same people? Is that a big deal or something. There are people who are critical of Obama for being corrupt. If you want Clinton specific things, you might find these articles interesting.I asked for evidence that makes her this corrupt person, not evidence that the system has issues. The issue at hand is that she is demonized as uniquely vilely corrupt and that is not backed up by evidence.
Of course the system has issues, that's besides the point though when talking specifically about Clinton, given that the accusations of her corruptness aren't she's part of a corrupt system but are that she's personally corrupt and abnormally so.
She is part of the same system Obama is and yet he's not getting the same accusations.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/w...e-haiti-wasnt-broken.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://www.thenation.com/article/wikileaks-haiti-let-them-live-3-day/
http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/01/11/subsidizing-starvation/
Both WaPo and Huffpost deleted their Bill Clinton apologizing for Haiti articles. It's a conspiracy!