• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT6| Delete your accounts

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's context, and then there's reading too much into things.

I mean, seriously. He didn't say it was stolen from him. He didn't even say he would have won. He said "I’ll tell you it would have been a hell of a lot closer."

It's an odd position because as turnout increases, Sanders does worse. The main advantage he has had this primary, is low turnouts.
 
It's so funny that people are going to be so insistent on waiting until California before calling the race when he's probably going to lose there too.

It's like when Rove was having his meltdown over Ohio, meanwhile Virginia and Colorado were called fo Obama too which essentially locked Romney out of the White House anyway.
 
It's so funny that people are going to be so insistent on waiting until California before calling the race when he's probably going to lose there too.

It's like when Rove was having his meltdown over Ohio, meanwhile Virginia and Colorado were called fo Obama too which essentially locked Romney out of the White House anyway.

Also, considering DC is June 14th...but Bernie's not expected to do well there, so...I guess it doesn't matter.
 
Hillary should not be declared the nominee until I get my ballot in November.
(Hillary crosses 270 electoral votes)

"WE SHOULD WAIT UNTIL EVERY STATE VOTES"

(Hillary is inaugurated in January)

"YOU KNOW BERNIE WON 20 STATES"

Also, considering DC is June 14th...but Bernie's not expected to do well there, so...I guess it doesn't matter.
There's also like 20 delegates. And they will be the last 20 delegates. I can't imagine the pledged delegate race coming down to that. It'll be decided by California.
 

Maledict

Member
The Barnie Frank thing does have a personal edge for me, to be honest. I remember reading about him when I was younger, when I was first getting into American politics properly, and it was hugely inspirational as a young gay man. What he had gone through, and how he continued to fight and be openly gay at a time when things seemed to be going heavily against us.

The notion that the DNC should throw him off the committee because Sanders complained he was mean is just... Unthinkable to me. The guys an LGBT liberal icon. He was fighting for gay rights and being a visible representing of our cause for years before the rest of the left got behind it. It would be an abhorrent betrayal of his record and what we stand for.
 
(Hillary crosses 270 electoral votes)

"WE SHOULD WAIT UNTIL EVERY STATE VOTES"

(Hillary is inaugurated in January)

"YOU KNOW BERNIE WON 20 STATES"


There's also like 20 delegates. And they will be the last 20 delegates. I can't imagine the pledged delegate race coming down to that. It'll be decided by California.

No, I know. It's just I find it funny that the argument is "We should wait until everyone gets to vote!" But then DC is just kinda shoved to the side because.....reasons.
 
The Barnie Frank thing does have a personal edge for me, to be honest. I remember reading about him when I was younger, when I was first getting into American politics properly, and it was hugely inspirational as a young gay man. What he had gone through, and how he continued to fight and be openly gay at a time when things seemed to be going heavily against us.

The notion that the DNC should throw him off the committee because Sanders complained he was mean is just... Unthinkable to me. The guys an LGBT liberal icon. He was fighting for gay rights and being a visible representing of our cause for years before the rest of the left got behind it. It would be an abhorrent betrayal of his record and what we stand for.
If he's such an LGBT icon why does he support Killary? Doesn't he know she wrote DOMA and DADT by her own hand, before which gays could freely marry and serve in the military until the Clintons ruined it for everyone?

Ironically I was digging up Hillary's past statements on SSM and she said in 06 she'd support New York legalizing it as she felt it was a states' issue. Interesting how that same year Bernie was pressuring the Vermont legislature not to legalize it. Great profiles in courage.
No, I know. It's just I find it funny that the argument is "We should wait until everyone gets to vote!" But then DC is just kinda shoved to the side because.....reasons.
Oh yeah, totally. Those reasons are black people btw.
 
This makes no sense. Think about it -- if the average American voter turnout is 60%, and the Baby Boom exists, these percentages cannot be accurate.

edit: Your link says "voter registration," not "voted."

I know but it shows a significantly higher interest in voting.

75-78% of over 65ers are registered to vote.

Less than 60% of 18 to 24ers are.


That's pathetic.

For some reason it's actually hard to find eligible voter demographics.
 
Choice quotes from the TIME interview.



Called Hillary Clinton pathetic. He does this twice in the interview.

Claimed Kentucky was a tie.

Thinks he has a shot at winning California.

Thinks that at the convention, everyone will unanimously adopt 15 an hour for the platform, no controversy at all. How does he think this works, anyway? Voice vote to determine the platform?

Thinks that the Democratic party will pretty easily give up on 70 years of free trade policy.

Is very hopeful he will make free college a part of the platform.

Thinks this is even up for debate.

Off the cuff proposes to recreate the United States finance system in his image without really providing any details.
Thinks he'll win most of his issues even though he handily lost the election.
Condescendingly asks the interviewer from TIME magazine if he is familiar with the concept of spin.

Complains about Nevada again. Which he lost. Despite saying just minutes before that the Democratic primary process needs to be more democratic.

Blows up at the interviewer for moving the interview along.

Simultaneously claims the rules are unfair and tries to take advantage of them.

nFIW4wx.gif
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Thanks for breaking that down Kristoffer,

Those are not the rantings of someone you negoiate with.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I think he might be right re: $15 an hour. All his delegates will vote for it at the convention and I think a surprising chunk of Clinton's might, it's a popular policy. He only needs ~12% of Clinton's delegates to back him on that one and it isn't an issue that is particularly divisive between them.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
I think he might be right re: $15 an hour. All his delegates will vote for it at the convention and I think a surprising chunk of Clinton's might, it's a popular policy. He only needs ~12% of Clinton's delegates to back him on that one and it isn't an issue that is particularly divisive between them.

It should be, i'd be surprised if you did not see the issue of $15 an hour in many parts of the country.
 

ampere

Member
If the primary was held today I think I would've voted for Hillary after this AIDS establishment bullshit

I felt the same way after voting for him in Georgia and then he went on to say "oh who cares about Southern voters"

/rage

I think he might be right re: $15 an hour. All his delegates will vote for it at the convention and I think a surprising chunk of Clinton's might, it's a popular policy. He only needs ~12% of Clinton's delegates to back him on that one and it isn't an issue that is particularly divisive between them.

It's not prudent to make $15/hr part of her platform because it's not currently feasible nationwide
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
My guess is all effort will be put on California, not necessarily to win it, but to put the results into question, or delay the counting somehow. No point in doing anything else. It's a two-way-win: make it look like California will be hell to force Hillary to claim victory after NJ, which would give him a justification to contest the whole process' validity, yet if she plays along and waits for California then go ahead and make California's process hell to drag it on as much as possible hoping the DNC will misstep trying to seal things up, which brings him back to having a justification to contest the whole process.

Either way, the end goal is "I can go as far as I need to, their only option is to kick me out and if they do I have a reason to run against them". It's the same tactic Trump had with the GOP.
 
There's no way in hell you are going to see a party platform of a national $15 movement. It would absolutely kill jobs in many rural communities. And with the social safety net already tenous, I would I don't even think it's a good idea. I'm all for starting to look at the idea of basic income, but right now just blanket raising to 15 everywhere shouldn't happen.
 
Here I'l do the math myself, this is total population not "eligible voters" best I can do.

According to the 2012 population estimates via the census

There were:

52 799 429 18-29 year olds in the US

43 164 909 65+ year olds in the US


And please keep in mind we are discussing a demographic of 11 years vs 65 to oldest person in the US

There are 240 400 252 people who are 18 and older in the US


18-29: 21-22% depending if you round up
65+: 17%-18% if you round up or not


2012 electorate share was:

18-29: 19%
65+: 16%

Difference of 2-3% under actual share for 18-29
and 1-2% of 65+

And I again remind you that we're comparing a group of only 11 years and one that is upwards of 20-30 years.

http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

And I imagine one of the bigger barriers for the older range of the 65+ is health and disability whereas the barrier in the 18-29 is apathy.
 

Iolo

Member
My guess is all effort will be put on California, not necessarily to win it, but to put the results into question, or delay the counting somehow. No point in doing anything else. It's a two-way-win: make it look like California will be hell to force Hillary to claim victory after NJ, which would give him a justification to contest the whole process' validity, yet if she plays along and waits for California then go ahead and make California's process hell to drag it on as much as possible hoping the DNC will misstep trying to seal things up, which brings him back to having a justification to contest the whole process.

Either way, the end goal is "I can go as far as I need to, their only option is to kick me out and if they do I have a reason to run against them". It's the same tactic Trump had with the GOP.

What's going to happen is that California will vote, Hillary will immediately become the presumptive nominee, and undeclared supers will move to her. If he does not concede, some of Bernie's declared supers will move to her (as we've seen on occasion) as will some percentage of his supporters now that the contest is over. His favorability numbers would also go down in that case, as they are currently so high because of support from Hillary voters.
 
Me, ten minutes ago:

Gosh, I guess Clinton might lose California after those e-mail stories of the last couple of days. Let me take a look at what Facebook is saying...

Wait... he went after Barney Frank? He attacked a leading HIV/AIDS activist group?

What the fuck?

I mean, he was being given an opportunity on a plate with the bad press Clinton was getting. All he had to do was stay on message while the right slammed Clinton over her e-mails and he could have maybe squeaked a win.

And he chose to piss off the LGBT community instead because they failed his purity test? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
 

Armaros

Member
Me, ten minutes ago:

Gosh, I guess Clinton might lose California after those e-mail stories of the last couple of days. Let me take a look at what Facebook is saying...

Wait... he went after Barney Frank? He attacked a leading HIV/AIDS activist group?

What the fuck?

I mean, he was being given an opportunity on a plate with the bad press Clinton was getting. All he had to do was stay on message while the right slammed Clinton over her e-mails and he could have maybe squeaked a win.

And he chose to piss off the LGBT community instead because they failed his purity test? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

He just needs to attack one other person/group with LGBT ties and he can complete the set.
 
Did y'all see that tweet from Trump about our foreign policy allies not doing their fair share. His myopic views lines up with %100 the tea party, I don't see how people don't see that.
 

Teggy

Member

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Trump's comments on Japan are fucking demented.



What is wrong with this guy? Who in America hates Japan?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/736672123012427776
Remember that there's a portion of the American public that believes Obama going to a foreign country and even discussing past historical events is an apology tour that serves to disrespect every member of the military from the last 80 years.

I think it was on PRI's The World program yesterday, they interviewed an Iraq veteran who felt Obama's Hiroshima speech was a gross apology and an affront to his grandfather (who, IIRC died in the Normandy invasion). And why the hell are we apologizing to Japan when they haven't apologized to China?
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Yes, we should hold a grudge for something that happened 70 years ago and was resolved by wiping out two of their cities. I think we got them back for that one Don.

He is just dead set on stirring up nationalism and jingoism regardless of how stupid it sounds.

Yep, our first White Nationalist Candidate on a major party ticket (I think? Benji, Benji Benji! That's how that works right?)

There may be an argument that he is simply a Xenophobic Nationalist (which goes without saying). So i'll ask that version instead.
 
Lots of mail in votes so some folks may have already cast for Sanders even if this news changes their mind
On the other hand, polling for Hilly in CA has been pretty great so some of those double digit leads we were seeing earlier could already be baked in.

The only worrisome poll was one that only had her up 2 and it was from some smaller outfit. Benchmark is projecting a 14 point win and SurveyUSA pegged it as an 18 point win. I mean maybe it could be another Michigan but I'm skeptical.

Bernie peeps holding out hope for California to save the day are in for a long night I figure.
 

Teggy

Member
On the other hand, polling for Hilly in CA has been pretty great so some of those double digit leads we were seeing earlier could already be baked in.

The only worrisome poll was one that only had her up 2 and it was from some smaller outfit. Benchmark is projecting a 14 point win and SurveyUSA pegged it as an 18 point win. I mean maybe it could be another Michigan but I'm skeptical.

Bernie peeps holding out hope for California to save the day are in for a long night I figure.

Yes, but what does Tyler say?
 
Some people are mad that college students that compare Israel to Nazi Germany are getting reprimanded and they say it isn't horrific racism, just anti-Zionism.

I mean, you're only getting at one thing when you compare Israel to Nazi Germany and "fascism" in general, come on, dumbfucks, grow a brain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom