Cummings
And Klobuschar too.
I like both of them, but in this instance, they're both incredibly fucking stupid.
Cummings
BonusI mean
They also identify with him because he is openly racist, which is how they think
I mean they cover medical and dental, 401k and you don't have to raid campaign funds to get an iPhone.
Yup. Some sort of looming scandal seems to be involved on his part, Trump will drag down a ton of people- take the cash while you can.Smart move, honestly
What happens when Garland leaves the court and goes to the FBI and Trump fires him for whatever bullshit two months and gets to have his cake and eat it? I don't know why anybody would even entertain Garland going over there.
In a couple weeks, we'll have to be careful calling trump the least popular president at this point in presidency, with Clinton and Ford both about to freefall.
At this point in Clinton's presidency, Clinton is a week away from controversially firing 7 travel office employees that dropped his approval to Trump levels for a few weeks.
At this point in Ford's presidency, Ford is not doing a very good job of distancing himself from Watergate and Vietnam, and is now a week away from the announcement of 7.2% unemployment number that will eventually reach 9%, pushing his approval to Trump levels for the next few months.
Wonder how long until someone pulls the "Higher approval than Ford and Clinton" card.
Trump is graded on a curve relative to his own bullshit. Oh, he's only in a twitter fight with one person and pissed off just two countries this week? Not bad.Hearing why their approval reached Trump levels makes me so pessimistic and depressed for this country. Like...that's it?
I would rather he be asking them for advice than banon, sessions, miller et el.
Hearing why their approval reached Trump levels makes me so pessimistic and depressed for this country. Like...that's it?
Next FBI director news is getting worse. Gowdy or Conryn. Ugh
Next FBI director news is getting worse. Gowdy or Conryn. Ugh
Neither of these are new names.
Rubio "endorsed" them on Twitter. Both would be terrible, and so would Mike Rogers.
Every option is going to be horrible, but at least with Cornyn there's a chance we can take his seat.
Unless somehow Trump chooses someone independent and actually decent.
Even if he did, the constant threat of "loyalty or firing" would be hanging over the whole thing. The independence of the FBI director, no matter who, is no longer assured.
So what is Trump gonna do when most of the FBI employees refuse to stop investigating? Is he gonna fire them all?
The Nixon leaks didn't stop when Nixon fired his AG and DAG.
Oh, the investigation will continue as best it can, and the leaks will of course never stop. But the actual, official results will never be trusted unless they result in everybody involved going to jail.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...018e4b00b643ebcb066?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Huffpo article that basically says that the Senate's Trumpcare bill will not be written with transparency in mind. Look for the Senate to pull some similar tricks that the House did to pass whatever their crap bill ends up looking like.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...018e4b00b643ebcb066?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Huffpo article that basically says that the Senate's Trumpcare bill will not be written with transparency in mind. Look for the Senate to pull some similar tricks that the House did to pass whatever their crap bill ends up looking like.
Thanks for Ted Cruz's seat I guess.
over/under we see trump reference this in a week.
cnn people being worthless as usual:
https://twitter.com/CillizzaCNN/status/863401376487010304
That's completely useless. Why bother making such a shit graphic? (That's Rhetorical btw).
Even if he did, the constant threat of "loyalty or firing" would be hanging over the whole thing. The independence of the FBI director, no matter who, is no longer assured.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...018e4b00b643ebcb066?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Huffpo article that basically says that the Senate's Trumpcare bill will not be written with transparency in mind. Look for the Senate to pull some similar tricks that the House did to pass whatever their crap bill ends up looking like.
over/under we see trump reference this in a week.
cnn people being worthless as usual:
https://twitter.com/CillizzaCNN/status/863401376487010304
over/under we see trump reference this in a week.
cnn people being worthless as usual:
https://twitter.com/CillizzaCNN/status/863401376487010304
What is that graphic suppose to show? A lot of red?
Kurtz and Cilliza both held the "Media Beat" position at the post and both were complete turds. It attracts a certain sort of person, apparently.I don't understand why CNN hired Cilizza. He was was worthless before and he's even more worthless on CNN.
jfchttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...018e4b00b643ebcb066?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Huffpo article that basically says that the Senate's Trumpcare bill will not be written with transparency in mind. Look for the Senate to pull some similar tricks that the House did to pass whatever their crap bill ends up looking like.
No but there were better names on the shortlist.Neither of these are new names.
God his articles are annoyingI don't understand why CNN hired Cilizza. He was was worthless before and he's even more worthless on CNN.
So basically the GOP Senate WANTS Dem Senators running for reelection to easily gain support by not voting for the bill.
Don't know if there is a thread about it yet, but you can now comment on the National monuments under review by the administration.
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=DOI-2017-0002-0001
GOP just learned they can say anything and get away with anything and still win elections 6 months ago.
There is not. You should make one.Don't know if there is a thread about it yet, but you can now comment on the National monuments under review by the administration.
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=DOI-2017-0002-0001
GOP just learned they can say anything and get away with anything and still win elections 6 months ago.
I think Matt Yglesias said something similar the other day: doesn't matter who is the next director of the FBI because now we know that job security is contingent on fealty to Trump. Whether it's Garland or Gowdy or Barack Obama in the job, the investigation will now be permanently compromised by the fact that Trump will not accept anyone for FBI director who doesn't pledge loyalty to him.