shinra-bansho
Member
Lol Ellison couldn't even win the shit sandwich DNC chair role.
1 data point isn't going to prove or disprove a trend. (And clearly, there are multiple things going on w/ the election w/ Scotland going the complete opposite direction due to local factors.)And if you wanted confirmation UK's election is not about urban city liberalism vs rural shire conservatism, Nick Clegg just lost his seat.
I started off supporting him and by the end I was glad Perez had been inserted by Obama's crew because of the red flags we were seeing from Ellison's campaign.Lol Ellison couldn't even win the shit sandwich DNC chair role.
So a quick summary of what happened in the UK for those of us who don't follow it?
Did the good guys or bad guys win?
No one has mentioned Unemployed Man yet today have they?
No. He doesn't believe. You can't rebrand someone into something. Corbyn and Sanders have been Corbyn and Sanders for decades.
Just rerun Sanders at this point tbh, he was always a better Corbyn.
Uh oh
I think the strongest candidate will win in an actual crowded field in 2020.
If the party pulls the same bullshit and tries to center around one person to make the primary "easy", we'll be fucked again.
I really don't want to see a small field. I want like 15+ legitimate candidates. Legit. Not, Sanders, 13 Martin O'malley's and Kamala Harris. Multiple strong contenders.
In that scenario the person with the strongest vision and most compelling ideas will likely come out on top. 2016 field was too small and was basically a candidate with experienced people and resources working for them vs someone with no idea what they were doing (I'm not trying to say, 'Sanders was robbed!', but Hillary running against other people with an actual chance of winning would have been nice)
W Mag said:A powerful man—your boss—invites you to discuss business after hours in an intimate setting. You feel uneasy. The man has crossed the line before, singling you out, blowing you kisses, whispering softly in your ear. But to turn him down would be an insult. And let's face it, you're a little intrigued. Someone powerful is paying attention to you.
The date is arranged at a swanky spot: the Beverly Hills Hotel or the Green Room at the White House. They both have bedrooms nearby which makes you a little nervous. Still, you assume others will be there. But when you arrive—surprise!— it's just the two of you. The waitstaff is discreet. You note: ”Two Navy stewards waited on us, only entering the room to serve food and drinks."
Your instincts tell you something's up, but it's hard to put into words. ”The one-on-one setting...was, at least in part, an effort to have me ask for my job and create some sort of patronage relationship." Bingo! This is not business as usual.
There's an ulterior motive.
The powerful man starts asking questions: Do you like your job? Do you want to keep it? You think your hard work and dedication makes the answers obvious. Still, you respond, ”I love my work," and want to keep at it. The powerful man nods. Then it happens: he moves on you ”like a bitch."
”I need loyalty," he says. ”I expect loyalty." He lays out the quid pro quo: you make him happy, he'll make you happy.
You're stunned. You know you should storm away from the small oval table. Instead, you sit paralyzed. Later, you recall, ”I didn't move, speak, or change my facial expression in any way during the awkward silence that followed." This is typical. When threatened, the nervous system sometimes goes into a ”freeze response." You assess the risk and determine that fight or flight doesn't help you. Staying put does.
No one has mentioned Unemployed Man yet today have they?
Not with the polling figures on the Muslim ban.You'd think a woman would have been a perfect candidate against a sexual predator, too.
You can get very far hating Muslims, but not very far if you are one.
I, for one, wouldn't hesitate to vote Inanimate Carbon Rod 2020.
In an ideal world the 2020 primaries would look like:
Kamala Harris
Al Franken
Keith Ellison
Tammy Duckworth
Kirsten Giilibrand
Amy Klobuchar
and some more I can't remember at the moment
and some more I can't remember at the moment
Ah, yes, the moderate pro-appeasement Democratic faction.
Let's not care what they think any more. Kind of a big message from Clinton and Corbyn.
It's like how the Rebels managed to blow up the Death Star partly because of their own skill and luck but also largely because of Krennic and Tarkin's arrogance and incompetence. The Empire survives but Vader is about to be demoted in favor of Dr. Cylo.
We'll have to see if Theresa May fights Boris Johnson's team of cybernetic warriors inside a space whale and if she finds a shifty archaeologist sidekick to know if the comparison holds up.
I dunno. I got a bad feeling.Not putting Booker on any "2020 Potential Candidates" list is silly.
In an ideal world the 2020 primaries would look like:
Kamala Harris
Al Franken
Keith Ellison
Tammy Duckworth
Kirsten Giilibrand
Amy Klobuchar
and some more I can't remember at the moment
I... never watched Star Wars.
I... never watched Star Wars.
Can you be more explicit as to what you mean by "the message from Clinton"?
https://youtu.be/Mt3QpDh7zXIThis mirrors my thoughts while I watched Comey testify:
What it Feels Like for a Woman and James Comey
The whole thing is worth a read.
TBH I don't think Franken and Klobuchar run against each other.In an ideal world the 2020 primaries would look like:
Kamala Harris
Al Franken
Keith Ellison
Tammy Duckworth
Kirsten Giilibrand
Amy Klobuchar
and some more I can't remember at the moment
Bingo.Booker is the Democrats Rubio.
I made that pretty vague, sorry.
The Democrats have always run an explicitly moderate platform on economic justice (at least since Dukakis).
The Bernie folks have made a compelling argument that that's an error today. Corbyn does too.
We should stop running moderates and start running advocates, both on economic and social justice.
I made that pretty vague, sorry.
The Democrats have always run an explicitly moderate platform on economic justice (at least since Dukakis).
The Bernie folks have made a compelling argument that that's an error today. Corbyn does too.
We should stop running moderates and start running advocates, both on economic and social justice.
Counterpoint, Macron's party is about to win big time and he ran on a basically being France's equivalent to Bill Clinton.
I think that kind of message CAN work in places where we could conceivably win by getting the cities to just outvote everyone else though.
I made that pretty vague, sorry.
The Democrats have always run an explicitly moderate platform on economic justice (at least since Dukakis).
The Bernie folks have made a compelling argument that that's an error today. Corbyn does too.
We should stop running moderates and start running advocates, both on economic and social justice.
i mean, his counterpoint to that is obviously that you've already tried a Macron. The candidate was called Hillary Clinton. Thus...
i mean, his counterpoint to that is obviously that you've already tried a Macron. The candidate was called Hillary Clinton. Thus...
I made that pretty vague, sorry.
The Democrats have always run an explicitly moderate platform on economic justice (at least since Dukakis).
The Bernie folks have made a compelling argument that that's an error today. Corbyn does too.
We should stop running moderates and start running advocates, both on economic and social justice.
Counterpoint, Macron's party is about to win big time and he ran on a basically being France's equivalent to Bill Clinton.
I think that kind of message CAN work in places where we could conceivably win by getting the cities to just outvote everyone else though.
Thats just what Quist tried to do in Montana last month and there isn't much evidence that it helped him at all.
Counterpoint, Macron's party is about to win big time and he ran on a basically being France's equivalent to Bill Clinton.
I think that kind of message CAN work in places where we could conceivably win by getting the cities to just outvote everyone else though.
That's what I assumed you meant, I just wanted to push back against any insinuation or potential for inference that Clinton or her voters represented some kind of "moderate pro-appeasement Democratic faction" that deserves to be ignored, or to ask for examples of appeasement.
I also want to re-iterate my point that it's really easy to over-interpret these things. What if Clinton's problem was that she was bad at campaigning, rather not being socialist enough? The party has already been noticeably moving to left. Every election Democrats have lost since 2000 has been by .1% of the vote or less. There are a host of counterfactuals in the universe. Etc.
The US is not the UK is not France?
The US is not the UK is not France?
A thought popped into my head. Let's say that Trump gets impeach, what would the GOP in that situation when this happens?
I hear this asserted a lot, but where's the evidence? Have you ever seen all three countries in the same place at the same time?
Booker is the Democrats Rubio.