No surprise there. The CNN tweet is ridiculous and funny as hell, so tens of thousands of people who hate Trump liked and retweeted.
If you think its funny you're getting fucking played.
No surprise there. The CNN tweet is ridiculous and funny as hell, so tens of thousands of people who hate Trump liked and retweeted.
Apparently Jared and Ivanke were chilling with the far right's most hated men this weekend.
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/881593525686685698
Apparently Jared and Ivanke were chilling with the far right's most hated men this weekend.
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/881593525686685698
Agreed.The Distraction theory got debunked in my eyes when it became clear that every "intentional" distraction was just as bad for optics if not worse than whatever is supposedly being distracted from.
"Let's get the heat off of this Healthcare bill by making everyone think I abused my power to blackmail news anchors into giving me fluff pieces!"
His approval has only been dropping over time. If this is an intended strategy it's working very poorly.
Apparently Jared and Ivanke were chilling with the far right's most hated men this weekend.
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/881593525686685698
How would you guys rank the people in the most legal trouble?
To me it seems like
1.Flynn
2.Manafort
3.Page
4.Trump
5.Sessions
6.Kushner
How would you guys rank the people in the most legal trouble?
To me it seems like
1.Flynn
2.Manafort
3.Page
4.Trump
5.Sessions
6.Kushner
Right now it feels like Kushner has to be higher than Trump or Sessions.How would you guys rank the people in the most legal trouble?
To me it seems like
1.Flynn
2.Manafort
3.Page
4.Trump
5.Sessions
6.Kushner
How would you guys rank the people in the most legal trouble?
To me it seems like
1.Flynn
2.Manafort
3.Page
4.Trump
5.Sessions
6.Kushner
I'm growing increasingly tired with the CNN v Trump fake news cycles where they act indignant but still actively paying morons on their network to defend the tweets he makes.
I'm growing increasingly tired with the CNN v Trump fake news cycles where they act indignant but still actively paying morons on their network to defend the tweets he makes.
They are the La Li Lu Le Lo... they are the Patriots.Apparently Jared and Ivanke were chilling with the far right's most hated men this weekend.
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/881593525686685698
There's some balance issues.Forgive me if I'm not up to date on how busted Senate rules have become, but if the ACA originally took 60 votes to pass, wouldn't an outright repeal out it requite 60? If possible, wouldn't it set up making it ridiculously easy to undo literally any bill the majority party didn't like from the past?
You're gonna wanna check those numbers again.The only silver lining is that this strategy has put Fox News into third place.
Forgive me if I'm not up to date on how busted Senate rules have become, but if the ACA originally took 60 votes to pass, wouldn't an outright repeal out it requite 60? If possible, wouldn't it set up making it ridiculously easy to undo literally any bill the majority party didn't like from the past?
The media just went along with it too. How convenient.Parliamentarian doesn't care and stealth enabled the nuclear option for dismantling government programs. Hopefully this Congress teaches the Dems that their precious Senate rules are meaningless to the GOP.
How would you guys rank the people in the most legal trouble?
To me it seems like
1.Flynn
2.Manafort
3.Page
4.Trump
5.Sessions
6.Kushner
Forgive me if I'm not up to date on how busted Senate rules have become, but if the ACA originally took 60 votes to pass, wouldn't an outright repeal out it requite 60? If possible, wouldn't it set up making it ridiculously easy to undo literally any bill the majority party didn't like from the past?
I think Trump should be ranked last because only Congress can punish him. Everyone else can be indicted through normal means and courts.
It has never been tested in the Supreme court if the President can not be tried while sitting.
A full repeal would take 60, yes. A partial repeal would only take 50.
This is why Trumpcare is called "Obamacare lite" by ultra conservative detractors. (Of course they'll still end up voting for it.)
Curious how that would be ruled.
That's not really why. They could go a lot more draconian if they had 50 votes to do so.
Apparently Jared and Ivanke were chilling with the far right's most hated men this weekend.
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/881593525686685698
It has never been tested in the Supreme court if the President can not be tried while sitting.
I dont see a solid basis for saying that POTUS cant be tried while in office, if it ever comes to that.
Part of me wonders if Trump's latest temper tantrum isn't because there's some big story coming down the pipeline (although I'm sure there is), but because this last week was one of those first in a LONG time that wasn't focused on Trump.
The healthcare fight took center stage all last week, and for once the attention seemed to be focused squarely on Republicans themselves.
Part of me wonders if Trump's latest temper tantrum isn't because there's some big story coming down the pipeline (although I'm sure there is), but because this last week was one of those first in a LONG time that wasn't focused on Trump.
The healthcare fight took center stage all last week, and for once the attention seemed to be focused squarely on Republicans themselves.
This is probably a decent theory.Part of me wonders if Trump's latest temper tantrum isn't because there's some big story coming down the pipeline (although I'm sure there is), but because this last week was one of those first in a LONG time that wasn't focused on Trump.
The healthcare fight took center stage all last week, and for once the attention seemed to be focused squarely on Republicans themselves.
A top White House official said Sunday were getting close to having the votes needed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare.
During an interview on Fox News Sunday, President Trumps director of legislative affairs Marc Short said a vote could take place soon after the July 4 recess.
We are at the point of scoring two separate bills throughout the course of this recess this week, Short said. So, we hope that we come back the week after recess, well have a vote.
He added that if Republicans find that the replacement part too difficult for the pulpits to come together that they should still move ahead with repealing Obamacare and come up with a replacement later. Both approaches contradict what President Donald Trump said on the campaign trail when he vowed insurance for everybody and White House counselor Kellyanne Conways promise that no one would lose coverage.
Short also suggested that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Offices credibility should be certainly questioned regarding its projection that 22 million people would be left uninsured within the decade because of the GOP bill, echoing what the White House previously claimed.
Cohn and Mnuchin aren't bluffing when they say they want to slash the corporate tax rate to 15% from the current 35%. Neither man has any interest in timid tax cuts, and they wager that special interests will relinquish their loopholes if they become convinced their tax rate really will be in the teens.
They're becoming far less wedded to revenue neutrality — the idea, favored by House and Senate Republican leadership, that tax cuts mustn't add to the deficit.
Here we go again
Tbf I don't trust the White House of all places when they're talking about whip counting, they clearly don't know or care. If it fails their god can just whine about it on Twitter, everyone wins!Here we go again
What does "we're getting close" mean? I remember the last time they said this and it didn't work out well.
Trump thinks if he says something enough it'll come true