Autodidact
Banned
God, they can't leave Goody Clinton alone.
So I'm guessing Camp David doesn't have internet
It's weekends like these when you say to yourself "damn I really wish the president went golfing again instead"I wonder about cell reception, too. I hope he doesn't get bored and start messing with the nuclear football.
https://twitter.com/Tim_Canova/status/875933887347798017
Announced last night 8pm run vs. @DWStweets again. At 2am my computer was attacked & surge protector fried. Same happened last campaign.
He is certifiable
He is certifiable
Look, any hacker worth their salt can send voltage packets through an ISP trace logger script. You can compress up to 8000 volts in a .rar and then when the modem tries to decrypt the file on the mainframe router, ZAP! Fucking fried.
He is certifiable
Politico has a nice article about Kander's widely-recognized potential, along with the awkwardness of his currently limited upwards mobility.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/06/17/how-jason-kander-won-by-losing-215271
MY BEAUTIFUL SON.
I would imagine he's going to run for something in 2018. He won't run for the Senate in 2018 (McCaskill), and the governorship is not up again until 2020. The Senate race he lost is not up again until 2022. Tough spot.
In-fucking-saneHe is certifiable
She'll probably be running against McCaskill, so Democrats might want a solid recruit for an open seat. Not sure what Kander's plan is for moving upward, but a stint in Congress might not hurt - if he can win it. Otherwise he'd be a two-time loser and that's not a terribly good look, though he could recover.Could Missouri's 2nd House district be a potential pickup? It has the same PVI as GA-06, R+8. I think I've heard people criticize Ann Wagner before, so perhaps she might be vulnerable.
She'll probably be running against McCaskill, so Democrats might want a solid recruit for an open seat. Not sure what Kander's plan is for moving upward, but a stint in Congress might not hurt - if he can win it. Otherwise he'd be a two-time loser and that's not a terribly good look, though he could recover.
Could Missouri's 2nd House district be a potential pickup? It has the same PVI as GA-06, R+8. I think I've heard people criticize Ann Wagner before, so perhaps she might be vulnerable.
I wouldn't mind him taking another run at Blunt in 2022, although there are several factors making the governor's run more appealing.No, he's from Kansas City and I don't think people would vote for a carpetbagger (source: grew up in MO-2). Wagner will be running for Senate, anyway.
Kander will run for Governor in 2020 against a (hopefully) weakened Greitens.
I wouldn't mind him taking another run at Blunt in 2022, although there are several factors making the governor's run more appealing.
- Presidential year
- Greitens is likely a weaker opponent than Blunt
- If a Dem president is elected in 2020 we will be very lucky to gain anywhere in 2022 in Senate races
- Voters seem more willing to cross party lines in state elections than federal
- Executive experience tends to be a better setup for a presidential run than Senatorial
Rick Wilson said:A little bird tells me that a certain White House staff member whose name rhymes with Beeve Stannon is crapping diamonds over Parscale.
Parscale?
Trump's digital director. He got called in for House testimony.
How reliable is Rick Wilson?
On a scale of Louise Mensch to Walter Cronkite?
How reliable is Rick Wilson?
Sure. Is he closer to the looney Mensch/Taylor side, or more to a Ben Wittes side of things?
Rick WIlson was, as far as I'm aware, the first person to ever mention the peepee tape, long before the Steele report went public. Sadly, he also incorrectly predicted it would come out in the final days of the election and destroy Trump.
But he seems to be worth paying attention to.
Rick WIlson was, as far as I'm aware, the first person to ever mention the peepee tape, long before the Steele report went public. Sadly, he also incorrectly predicted it would come out in the final days of the election and destroy Trump.
But he seems to be worth paying attention to.
Alright I'm checking this out
The blurbs on the back of the cover are a little bit of a red flag. Lots of "unlike the urban elites SHE went into REAL AMERICA to listen. But I picked this up because of an article someone made a thread about here referencing her conversations with people who recognize they're being poisoned by pollution but still vehemently reject protective regulation and support market capitalism. And doesn't conclude that they're stupid or being duped. And I think that moving beyond thinking these people are stupid or being duped is one of the most important things we need to do right now
Event planner Lynne Patton, a Trump loyalist without any housing experience, will run the office overseeing New Yorks housing programs.
Trump named Patton to the position Wednesday, where shell oversee the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developments (HUD) Region II, home to both New York and New Jersey. Vacant since January 20, the job has been in need of new shoes  but Patton may not be what many had in mind.
Up until now, Pattons biggest claim to fame seems to be planning the wedding of Eric Trump, the presidents son. According to her LinkedIn public profile, Patton says she holds a law degree from Quinnipiac University (with an unexplained N/A written next to the degree), in addition to an unnamed degree from Yale University. But Quinnipiac school registrar Jim Benson told the New York Daily News that, while Patton had attended for two semesters, she never graduated. Her connection to Yale also remains unclear and unverified  HUD officials could not confirm to the publication why she had listed the Ivy League institution.
But they are stupid and they have been duped. They've bought into an ideology founded on exploiting and slowly killing them.
But they are stupid and they have been duped. They've bought into an ideology founded on exploiting and slowly killing them.
Really, like back in October or November? I truly don't remember that.
I think someone who acknowledges pollution is bad for them but is still fighting against regulation of it is stupid in a sense.Alright I'm checking this out
The blurbs on the back of the cover are a little bit of a red flag. Lots of "unlike the urban elites SHE went into REAL AMERICA to listen. But I picked this up because of an article someone made a thread about here referencing her conversations with people who recognize they're being poisoned by pollution but still vehemently reject protective regulation and support market capitalism. And doesn't conclude that they're stupid or being duped. And I think that moving beyond thinking these people are stupid or being duped is one of the most important things we need to do right now
Uh....
There it is
There it is
Two things.
One: That is a Trumpian move.
Two: Dude, cite your quotes with links.
It's not stupidity, it's a different value system from yours.You mean the stupidity and the dupability?
I concur.
It's not stupidity, it's a different value system from yours.
That's normative, even if I agree. I just think it's a mistake to think people don't know what they're doing and say they're "duped". Let them own their choices.Specifically a worse one
It's not stupidity, it's a different value system from yours.
Specifically a worse one
That's normative, even if I agree. I just think it's a mistake to think people don't know what they're doing and say they're "duped". Let them own their choices.
How long have we been doing this? Is '96 closer to the broad strategy you think is important? Because you can't run, you know, different mutually exclusive messages across the country. You have to have a national platform and so reaching other areas means compromising on things you care about. I think a 50 state strategy is the wrong direction because you want to keep your coalition of voters as small as possible while maintaining a slim majority, so you can give as much goodies to your side as possible. We don't need to bring back dog whistles just to gain voters if we know we'll have the numbers again by taking back northern states like Pennsylvania and Michigan and maybe flipping Florida back once the retirees die off, all without having to get any southern voters at all.Yes, as a matter of tactics you put extra emphasis on your top target areas, but for too long we've put too many of our eggs in too few baskets.