I was not referring to the results on the presidential level but state level. I found the last state level results.
Yes and no... you have a lot of power over your state, but not in the national spotlight as much, and you are not on committees and passing laws that can have sweeping effects across the nation. You are more of a local/regional presence unless you are popular like Kasich.Is governor a big step up from senator?
Generally it's a step down but Collins is 65 and likely nearing the end of her time in politics anyway in the next decade, so it makes sense for her circumstances.Is governor a big step up from senator?
Is governor a big step up from senator?
Do people think that Susan Collins will run for governor in 2018? That would be huge for D chances of retaking the Senate, or at least forcing Pence to make a lot of tiebreakers.
Generally it's a step down but Collins is 65 and likely nearing the end of her time in politics anyway in the next decade, so it makes sense for her circumstances.
I struggle to think of a moderate position that makes sense other than centrism. Like, I guess you could be really far left and right on various different issues? Doesn't seem logical.
Or politically apathetic/ignorant by choice. Which is still dumb.
It's the random collection of far left/right positions- https://www.vox.com/2014/7/8/5878293/lets-stop-using-the-word-moderateI struggle to think of a moderate position that makes sense other than centrism. Like, I guess you could be really far left and right on various different issues? Doesn't seem logical.
Or politically apathetic/ignorant by choice. Which is still dumb.
OK HD-75 Results:
(R) Nunley - 47.68%
*(D) Gaddis - 52.32%
OK SD-44 Results (2 precincts remaining):
Griffin (R) - 45.32%
*(D) Brooks - 54.68%
Those are some big swings.
Man, that piece of analysis has held up even worse than usual for Nate.
OK HD-75 Results:
(R) Nunley - 47.68%
*(D) Gaddis - 52.32%
OK SD-44 Results (2 precincts remaining):
Griffin (R) - 45.32%
*(D) Brooks - 54.68%
Those are some big swings.
What issues do you have with it?
Governors performed horribly in the 2016 primary. (And pitting Tim Pawlenty and Rick Santorum in a cage fight to the death lol)
2016 could be an abberation, but when you look at the broader trend with 2008's heavy lean towards Senators and even the 2004 Democratic primary, I think presidential politics is more national than ever before. It appears that you need a national profile more than ever to launch a successful presidential bid, and by virtue of their job, senators have a much more national profile than governors do.
Finally, Nate has a very poor grasp of primary politics because the polling is far too volatile, and it was more glaring than ever in 2016.
@DKElections
Also, Oklahoma's #HD75 (one of the seats Dems won tonight) went 58-36 for Trump. Will have Trump numbers for #SD44 soon
Was there an election tonight in Oklahoma? If there was i didnt hear a single thing about it.
DailyKos running the Trump numbers for those districts.
That's a D+26.2 swing.
What's this have to do with Herbie Hancock.... wait.Someone named Maiden Voyage really ought to understand this intuitively.
I get to vote again in VA in 4 months.Woo wee, what's going on in OK to justify this swing? I thought it was a very reliable red state.
Woo wee, what's going on in OK to justify this swing? I thought it was a very reliable red state.
Did Dems pick up both Oklahoma seats?
Niiiice. I know we were favored in one of them (the Dem raised over 100k which is obscene for a State House district) but I believe the Senate seat would have been considered an upset.
Iirc the gov there (Fallin?) is also very unpopular so that could be a contributing factor.
I mean sure but a lot of shitty GOP governors got reelected in 2014. Brownback, Snyder, Scott, LePage... The overwhelming sense of "OBAMA SUX ISIS EBOLA BLEARRRRRGGGGH" prevailed over "man these guys are really fucking incompetent"We still re-elected her in 2014.
I can proudly say that I live in one of the few Democratic Senate districts (don't try to find me). Again, the Native American population probably helps substantially.
I mean sure but a lot of shitty GOP governors got reelected in 2014. Brownback, Snyder, Scott, LePage... The overwhelming sense of "OBAMA SUX ISIS EBOLA BLEARRRRRGGGGH" prevailed over "man these guys are really fucking incompetent"
Trump?This is now the third special election in Oklahoma with huge swings. The last one, the Dem almost pulled off an upset in a Trump+50 district. Something's going on there. Fallin?
Trump?
Republicans about to get curb stomped like it's 2006? I HOPE SO
So wait, did we pick up some seats in OK?
OK I think is proving an interesting test case. When the national Republican apparatus bends itself towards a particular race (GA-6), they can absolutely summon the diehard support. When they don't, you get these OK races.
Speaks well of our chances for 2018, tbh. FOX only has so many hours in a day.
This is now the third special election in Oklahoma with huge swings. The last one, the Dem almost pulled off an upset in a Trump+50 district. Something's going on there. Fallin?
Not every race is going to have $50 million thrown at it either.OK I think is proving an interesting test case. When the national Republican apparatus bends itself towards a particular race (GA-6), they can absolutely summon the diehard support. When they don't, you get these OK races.
Speaks well of our chances for 2018, tbh. FOX only has so many hours in a day.
OK I think is proving an interesting test case. When the national Republican apparatus bends itself towards a particular race (GA-6), they can absolutely summon the diehard support. When they don't, you get these OK races.
Speaks well of our chances for 2018, tbh. FOX only has so many hours in a day.
Yup. A wave is a wave.
West Virginia moved right.IIRC Oklahoma is the only state that went more red in 2008 compared to every other 49 states that trended blue. Just a throwaway nugget.
I think education could be our winning issue next year, particularly in state elections and especially in red states where the governors have totally screwed the pooch.
That being said, it DOES mean that the Senate is almost certainly out of reach. If I were Republican propaganda strategists right now, I'd basically write off the house and devote the time and money to securing Flake and whoever the next most vulnerable ends up being that isn't Heller (who's almost certainly done for). Maybe go after a really poorly polling D red stater. There's no way they can defend every vulnerable House seat they'd need to, but if they focus in on a couple Senate races they can probably keep those.