So since a lot of you are Dems if I say I'm out driving people to polls, you'll beat me with sticks, right?
No, its nice to have a reasonable republican in here. At least, you don't seem to say anything too vitriolic.
So since a lot of you are Dems if I say I'm out driving people to polls, you'll beat me with sticks, right?
BRUUUUCE!
Depends on the state I suppose.So since a lot of you are Dems if I say I'm out driving people to polls, you'll beat me with sticks, right?
No, its nice to have a reasonable republican in here. At least, you don't seem to say anything too vitriolic.
Depends on the state I suppose.
Just kidding. Do whatever you can to get the vote out. I want as much democracy as possible, not just democracy at the expense of those I disagree with.
Drive people to polls is always a big one.
FINAL PREDICTION
....same as two weeks ago.
Obama wins with 2008 map excluding indiana (which, by the way, why did they have such a huge swing?)
Dems gain 1-3 senate seats
Dems take the house by 2.
Never gonna happen. Have you seen whats happened on a national level with redistricting? Repubs fortified week seats into stronger ones and Gov. Cuomo pretty much muted what the Dems would have gained from California by ignoring a proposed plan to gain seats in New York.
Know what I'm really going to enjoy?
That magical period of time on Election Night where Ohio has been called for Obama, but the West Coast states aren't called yet, and the anchors are pretending that Romney can still seek other, more-arduous-but-possible paths to victory. Watching them squirm and hypothesize is going to be so much fun!
In a landslide election, not even redistricting can stop the wave.
2010 California election was a preview.
Jeff Flake campaign sending Democrat voters to wrong polling place according to this local News report:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaMpVOjotI8
(source)Lindsey Graham said:If we lose this election there is only one explanation demographics. ... If I hear anybody say it was because Romney wasnt conservative enough Im going to go nuts. Were not losing 95 percent of African-Americans and two-thirds of Hispanics and voters under 30 because were not being hard-ass enough.
"If Mitt Romney can turn New Mexico..." utters Chuck Todd as his spiral into the toilet flush continues sporadically
"If Mitt Romney can turn New Mexico..." utters Chuck Todd as his spiral into the toilet flush continues sporadically
Yup.
haha this tactic was used in Canada in Liberal ridings in Ontario in our last Federal election in 2011
Conservatives all over the world unite in suppression
Well, you see, they are simply defending themselves against the tyranny of the majority. All of us plebes are trying to get together and "exercise our voting rights," which means we will elect monsters who take away the conservatives' God-given money and unchecked power.
It's analogous to defending your home from thieves.
How have we not spent more time on this inspiring young candidate? http://www.mindymeyer4senate.com/
I'll admit your sure full of optimism. But it's just not gonna happen. Wish it would. 2 out of 3 aint bad.
Just got back from more canvassing in Florida.
Don't count this state out. There are hopeful signs down here.
I'm going to watch the election unfold at a big celebration by the waterfront. Expecting good times.
Why hasn't the 538 forecast converged with the now-cast yet? When exactly is that going to happen? It's still an almost two point disparity. That's huge.
Know what I'm really going to enjoy?
That magical period of time on Election Night where Ohio has been called for Obama, but the West Coast states aren't called yet, and the anchors are pretending that Romney can still seek other, more-arduous-but-possible paths to victory. Watching them squirm and hypothesize is going to be so much fun!
Romney could still win California!
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/265581293713113088Dave Weigel
OH Dem tells me Romney needs a 55-45 win on election day to take the state, thx to early votes. Skewed?
Nate is going to be on Colbert tonight.
Cool. So I'm on the same page as markos then.kos is predicting Senate wins in MA, ME, MO, IN, FL, OH, VA, MT, WI, CT, NV
Losses in AZ, ND, NE
Final tally 55-45 Dem.
Really doesn't seem far-fetched to me, though many races will be quite close. MO, IN, NV represent the likely downside, with ND the most realistic upside.
E-V has MT, WI and ND as ties and Berkley down in NV, but I am keeping my fingers crossed there given Reid-Angle. Sam Wang saying 53-55. Nate is pretty conservative at 52.5.
I'll be happy with any number >=53, honestly. That's a repeat of 2006, which was such an awesome year.
Giving up on the house. I'll keep my fingers crossed for a surprise stealth wave but we'll know pretty early whether or not there's any chance I imagine.
How have we not spent more time on this inspiring young candidate? http://www.mindymeyer4senate.com/
kos is predicting Senate wins in MA, ME, MO, IN, FL, OH, VA, MT, WI, CT, NV
Losses in AZ, ND, NE
Final tally 55-45 Dem.
Really doesn't seem far-fetched to me, though many races will be quite close. MO, IN, NV represent the likely downside, with ND the most realistic upside.
E-V has MT, WI and ND as ties and Berkley down in NV, but I am keeping my fingers crossed there given Reid-Angle. Sam Wang saying 53-55. Nate is pretty conservative at 52.5.
I'll be happy with any number >=53, honestly. That's a repeat of 2006, which was such an awesome year.
Giving up on the house. I'll keep my fingers crossed for a surprise stealth wave but we'll know pretty early whether or not there's any chance I imagine.
You sir are a good man!
kos is predicting Senate wins in MA, ME, MO, IN, FL, OH, VA, MT, WI, CT, NV
Losses in AZ, ND, NE
Final tally 55-45 Dem.
Really doesn't seem far-fetched to me, though many races will be quite close. MO, IN, NV represent the likely downside, with ND the most realistic upside.
E-V has MT, WI and ND as ties and Berkley down in NV, but I am keeping my fingers crossed there given Reid-Angle. Sam Wang saying 53-55. Nate is pretty conservative at 52.5.
I'll be happy with any number >=53, honestly. That's a repeat of 2006, which was such an awesome year.
Giving up on the house. I'll keep my fingers crossed for a surprise stealth wave but we'll know pretty early whether or not there's any chance I imagine.
Blitzer was totally trying to troll Beau Biden and Biden was having none of it.