51*2 = 104 days. We'd seem him in three months.
106 since he also failed to call the election. You know what I mean though, the dude just threw away his GAF account.
51*2 = 104 days. We'd seem him in three months.
I'm calling it now, I think obama will win every swing state. Yeah I went there.
Florida and North Carolina are gonna flip this yearI already said this a couple days ago. Thanks for joining me.
But more importantly we are poised to blow the Obama campaign out on Election Day thanks to a superior GOTV program and a historical GOP Election Day advantage
I shouldn't do this, but...
You were also wrong about Inception, and I'm pretty sure during the debt-ceiling fiasco, you said Obama would throw the EPA and Planned Parenthood under the bus.
Also, summer would be "The beginning of the end" for Obama, and you were sure Romney would be leading sometime in September.
I already said this a couple days ago. Thanks for joining me.
Haha, is that you? As Kaijima said, that is such a pitch perfect mirror of reality, it's hard to believe it's not a troll.
Sam still has Florida in white. Nate is really going all in. Will he update one final time tomorrow afternoon?
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/romney-supporters-obama-47-percent-victory.php?ref=fpa
Romney Supporters Ready To Blame Government Moochers If Obama Wins
Oh god, you guys need to see this. It's got me rolling, I might die :lol
From the election thread.
Wait, so Obama had Bruce Springsteen call Chris Christie I heard on nightly news? He's really wining and dining Chris Christie.
You guys are taking opinionatedcyborg seriously?
So I've seen some pretty racist and nasty stuff from the conservative right about Obama on mainstream websites.
Is there an equivalent on the left against Romney making it mainstream on the Internet?
Reading Free Republic right now is like opening a window into a parallel universe:
BizzaroGAF said:Meanwhile, over at Kos, they are predicting Obama wins HANDILY, and Repubs LOSE 4 Senate Seats, as many House seats...
Simply delusional...
I think it's long been observed by folks on our side, that liberals are immune to facts, logic, and reason.
While our side has been busy analyzing every single data point available in this race, and crunching the hard, documented numbers, liberals have been clinging to little more than their faith in their vaunted 'messiah', and living in a self-validating echo chamber, eating rainbow colored Skittles.
They've been listening to regime foot soldiers like Chris Matthews, Ed Schultz, Nate Silver, Paul Krugman, Rachel Maddow, and others. They've allowed partisan hacks like Bill Clinton to convince them that victory is assured, and that James Carville had it right, when he predicted 40 more years of Democrat rule.
These people are going to experience a psychotic breakdown when the race ends in an historic landslide against their boy king. If you thought they went nuts after GWB won in 2000, you ain't seen nuthin yet.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2955407/posts
It'll be nice to see how they react on this rare occasion where the right wing bubble around them finally pops.
Wait, so Obama had Bruce Springsteen call Chris Christie I heard on nightly news? He's really wining and dining Chris Christie.
There's a lot of dehumanizing him, and a lot of attacking him for merely being wealthy (not the same as pointing out where he's out of touch). Nothing as bad as the racism.
Wow! That first one is amazing. It is like the Bizarro-PolliGAF.
Haha, I'm taking Rachel's advice and carbo-loading to keep up with the coverage tomorrow night.
Which stations should I watch tomorrow?
I was thinking CNN but they are way to frustrating nowadays. Will MSNBC good? I want Maddow 24/7.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/01/is-nate-silvers-value-at-risk/#ixzz2BPLuP3yj
Silver stormed onto the scene in 2008 when, according to his acolytes, he correctly predicted how 49 of 50 states would vote in the presidential election (he missed Indiana). Do not remind his disciples that of the four close states — those with margins of 2.5% or less — Silver only forecast three of them correctly. And definitely do not remind them that the polls in swing states correctly forecast all but two states (Indiana and North Carolina).
A bit shocked at 538. I don't think Obama will get much over 300, if that. If you look at the bottom chart it shows 330 as the most likely outcome at around 20%.
Yeah, I'm wondering if that message was a troll. Because it was a very much like a flip-side of the PoliGaf argument. i.e. we are relying on facts & figures (538, PEC, etc.) and they are relying more on faith (literally).It's SO HARD, even based on the experience I have with people like that, to not believe a lot of those people are professional trolls riling up the conservative webspace for their own enjoyment.
The way they're framing stuff is more or less a perfect mirror projection - assigning all the attributes of the right's low information voters, with their "gut feelings" and religious-messianic attachment to their icons and hopefuls. Meanwhile over here in reality-land, I don't think I've ever met a single democratic leaning person who is not very worried about Romney winning, or who thinks Obama has it easy. Much less Obama is a "messiah".
On the other hand, maybe every word they say is typed in true faith. After all, the Fox news and right wing radio consortium has been trying to frame Obama since day one as a "new age religious movement" for whatever reasons. Perhaps as a way to help throw a scare into conservative religious voters - rile up an extra reason to fear Obama's otherness. He's not just a black muslim gay socialist - he's a new age pagan religion too!
Fox
Ok drudge.
I'm sure this isn't an original thought but why don't we yet hold an online vote, in addition to the IRL vote, even just as a "mock" vote? It doesn't have to count, take as many years as needed to run mock online votes right alongside the real vote, until we're all assured that the online system works.
Which stations should I watch tomorrow?
I was thinking CNN but they are way to frustrating nowadays. Will MSNBC good? I want Maddow 24/7.
I swear GAF if full of nothing but Masochists and Sadists.
I interpret that chart differently. While there is a 20% chance of hitting 330ev, if you add up all the outcomes between 270 and 330 there looks to be about a 40-50% of one of these scenarios happening. That's why I think the forecast of 314 seems a bit more accurate.
I went shopping today for some pretty heavy-duty Election Night goodies. Lots of caffeine, carbs, sugar.. I'm going to be bouncing off the walls for most of the night, and probably weeping with hysterical joy when the big states are called. Gonna be fun!
I'm sure this isn't an original thought but why don't we yet hold an online vote, in addition to the IRL vote, even just as a "mock" vote? It doesn't have to count, take as many years as needed to run mock online votes right alongside the real vote, until we're all assured that the online system works.
I swear GAF if full of nothing but Masochists and Sadists.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/01/is-nate-silvers-value-at-risk/#ixzz2BPLuP3yj
Silver stormed onto the scene in 2008 when, according to his acolytes, he correctly predicted how 49 of 50 states would vote in the presidential election (he missed Indiana). Do not remind his disciples that of the four close states those with margins of 2.5% or less Silver only forecast three of them correctly. And definitely do not remind them that the polls in swing states correctly forecast all but two states (Indiana and North Carolina).
Imagine if Florida allocated its electoral votes proportionately.