oh fivethirtyeight
florida is a slight shade of blue. virginia is likely obama. ohio is so blue it's off the tossup state list.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23dvaEwG-W0
hey Poligaf. I don't know too much about politics, but I've been lurking in and reading this thread with great interest for the past few weeks. Waiting for the election results with bated breath. I have be at work until about 10:30PM tomorrow, how much am I going to miss from the TV coverage? How many states do you think will be called by that time?
Have another hit courtesy of Sam Wang & election.princeton.eduThat current 538 is all the hopium I need... great to see and a welcome sight after the thrashing my Eagles are taking at the moment. =)
Sure, I'll bite. For one thing, Ohio, and most of the other states Obama needs to win, are outside of the 2.5% margin. Two, that margin is arbitrary. The one state Silver did predict wrong (Indiana) was much, much closer than 2.5% in his forecast. In fact, I think he had it within 1%. And those Indiana polls clearly showed movement toward Obama in the final weeks of the campaign; by contrast, polls in pivotal swing states are showing movement away from Romney.I haven't seen a single person address this. This is going to be a very close race in multiple states, and Silver's track record with those isn't good
Yeah. That I can. Skip ordering real food I guess. Now should I get beer or wine? Hmm. Think I'll go with wine.
That's why I said do it as a mock vote until we can fortify the process well enough against such attacks. Run it online regardless, in addition to the offline process. Let them hack, but also let us vote online through official channels like we should be able to in this day and age. Fall back on the offline vote if we must but don't simply forego online voting in the meantime.Chinese hackers
The Anderson Cooper clip from earlier this evening with the Romney talking head
http://youtu.be/1AYR2gSFklA
oh, and nate's projecting obama to win ohio by .4 more points than his model projected in 2008.
i couldn't find this information, because it wasn't in the competitive states tab.
That's why I said do it as a mock vote until we can fortify the process well enough against such attacks. Run it online regardless, in addition to the offline process. Let them hack, but also let us vote online through official channels like we should be able to in this day and age. Fall back on the offline vote if we must but don't simply forego online voting in the meantime.
The 538 Now-Cast and Forecast have officially converged.
I like Tim Wise but I think he's wrong on that point.Tim Wise, an anti-racism activist spoke at my school just now. Made a very interesting point.
He believes that this is the republicans last chance to lower taxes and end the "welfare state". Because with their current platform and ideaologies, and they demographics in this country, they will no longer be able to win a national election. Would explain how partisan and crazy they got recently. And apparently some republican official basically said this.
So, if they don't change their ideologies, they'll no longer be able to win. It'd be interesting to see if the republicans shift a little to the left, if the democrats will go further left.
WHY IS THERE IS .1 DIFFERENCE?????
The 538 Now-Cast and Forecast have officially converged.
Gonna be plenty of free whine coming from right tomorrow evening.
I'd like to think we could figure this out. Treat it like an exclusive "beta" early on if we must. Do the whole invite thing. Just do it and keep doing it until such time as it can officially replace offline voting.Asking people to vote more than once will cause confusion
The 538 Now-Cast and Forecast have officially converged.
Asking people to vote more than once will cause confusion
-Plans to make Kenya the 51st State.
-Creation of new cabinet level department dedicated solely to abortion.
-Dedicate the Freedom Tower to the memory of Osama Bin Laden.
-Nullify all current traditional marriages.
-Completely socialize the current medicare program.
-Amend first amendment to mandate citizens to choose between either Shariah Law or secular humanism.
I don't even understand the criticism here.
"Do not remind his disciples that of the four close states those with margins of 2.5% or less Silver only forecast three of them correctly."
Yes, with the very close races you expect to get some right and some wrong.
"And definitely do not remind them that the polls in swing states correctly forecast all but two states (Indiana and North Carolina)"
Yes, his model is based mostly on the polls so of course it will be similar to them.
Thanks Captain Obvious, Nate's 538 model is based on polling! You don't say!
Remember: Dick Morris makes millions of dollars a year helping candidates and parties win world-wide. Theres a reason both Trent Lott and Bill Clinton hired him. If he, Michael Barone and Karl Rove say its gonna rain, buy a boat.
I'd like to think we could figure this out. Treat it like an exclusive "beta" early on if we must. Do the whole invite thing. Just do it and keep doing it until such time as it can officially replace offline voting.
I hope the 538 numbers don't have people celebrating early or worse, not voting =/
Seems someone leaked the plans for Obama's TRUE intentions in his second term:
Seems someone leaked the plans for Obama's TRUE intentions in his second term:
It's no wonder it's over 90%
If you take all states Nate has over 90% it already equals 271:
http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_predictions.php?mapid=bpMg
Meanwhile, CO, IA, VA and NH are all over 80%.
Polls ticked up in the last 2 days.Damn. Wonder what the reason is for the national boost?
What's he doing?
I hope the 538 numbers don't have people celebrating early or worse, not voting =/
See that, Romney? Six point plan.