• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PolliGaf 2012 |OT5| Big Bird, Binders, Bayonets, Bad News and Benghazi

Status
Not open for further replies.

thefro

Member
Just how many polls have been done for Indiana, anyway? I'm not saying Obama could flip it, but with the attention on Mourdock and Romney still endorsing him and combining that with the apparently 50% rise in early voting, that could get interesting.

Rasmussen had it 54-41 Romney and Mourdock up 47-42 over Donnelly about ten days ago. I don't think Mourdock is going to make many people change their Presidential vote in Indiana, but we'll see.

I'd say Romney would still have at least a 7-8 point lead in Indiana at this time.
 

Averon

Member
Why is McCain so angry at Powell? It isn't just because of the Obama endorsement, right? Is there some bad blood between McCain and Powell due to Iraq?
 

syllogism

Member
I don't really put too much trust into Obama campaign spin either, but I suppose this may be true to some degree

They also say their secret weapon in Wisconsin — a key to Obama’s Midwest-heavy electoral path — is the state’s same-day registration law, with new voters breaking to Obama by a predicted 2-to-1 margin.
That alone could account for as much as a “four-point gain on election day,” an official told POLITICO.
 

Slime

Banned
So much for Gallup trending back toward Obama, huh? = /

I'm really starting to think that a Romney PV victory is in the cards after all. I'm actually surprised 538 still only has the likelihood of that happening at a mere 30%. Maybe it'll rise.
 

richiek

steals Justin Bieber DVDs
I have this dread that the Obama campaign is going to get rocked by this Libya story. Goddamn it, fuck Pctx.

Please. Romney tried to nail Obama with Libya in the debates and failed miserably. What makes you think it'll work now?
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
New Nate Silver article is up.

Oct. 25: The State of the States
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/26/oct-25-the-state-of-the-states/

Key sentence:

No, these are:

Mr. Romney’s strongest number came in a Fox News poll of Virginia, which had him 2 points ahead there – a sharp reversal from a 7-point advantage there for Mr. Obama before the Denver debate. However, Mr. Romney’s worst poll of the day was probably also in Virginia, where Public Policy Polling showed Mr. Obama’s lead expanding to 5 points from 2.
 

pigeon

Banned
Nate sez:
nyt said:
However, we may be approaching the point where the state polls will have to be systematically biased toward Mr. Obama in order for Mr. Romney to have strong chances of prevailing on Election Day.

This is really a more dramatic statement than it might look, since the state polls are done by a variety of different pollsters. Nate is saying that Romney's best hope is that there's a fundamental misunderstanding of the electorate that is causing every single poll to misread the state of the game.

In other words, Romney should be hoping that the polls are...skewed.
 

RDreamer

Member
I don't really put too much trust into Obama campaign spin either, but I suppose this may be true to some degree

Same day registration is awesome, and it's especially awesome you can do it for early voting. I really fucking hope that Walker and the republicans don't do something about that after this year. I've used same day registration every time I've moved. It's incredibly convenient.
 

Zabka

Member
Probably viewers of her show, and just other random people that think it's fun and/or interesting? It's just a web ad, right?

She probably wanted to help out and do an ad for Obama, and that's what she came up with. It probably didn't cost much more than some guy with a decent camera and a couple minutes of her time and some editing. Who gives a fuck?
I give a fuck that the Obama campaign releases lame ads, that's why I said it. The Obama campaigns hard-on for cheesy celebrities continues to baffle me.
 

Tim-E

Member
More polls for WI/MN pls

Obama has a 97% chance of winning Minnesota. Seriously, how on earth can you convince yourself that he's losing that state? There are ELEVEN days left until we vote for a new President and both of these campaigns are sitting on a mountain of money. They need to blow it somewhere because there's likely no more room to air anymore ads in the big swing states. Might as well air some ads in places that neighbor swing states.
 

Effect

Member
New Nate Silver article is up.

Oct. 25: The State of the States
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/26/oct-25-the-state-of-the-states/

Key sentence:



That's all that matters. :)

Indeed. That's all I care about. I want Obama to win and I don't care how he does it as long as he does. As long as state polling stays as it is or continues to get better the averages hold in Obama's favor I don't care what the national polls say because the south and deep red states will go to Romney no matter what and it doesn't matter if he really over performs there.
 

pigeon

Banned
I give a fuck that the Obama campaign releases lame ads, that's why I said it. The Obama campaigns hard-on for cheesy celebrities continues to baffle me.

Believe it or not, people like celebrities, especially young people. That's what makes them celebrities in the first place, their ability to get people to go out and do things like spend $30 and three hours sitting in a dark room watching a movie that almost, but not quite, contains boobs. Getting them to vote is probably comparatively straightforward.
 

Loudninja

Member
Obama has a 97% chance of winning Minnesota. Seriously, how on earth can you convince yourself that he's losing that state? There are ELEVEN days left until we vote for a new President and both of these campaigns are sitting on a mountain of money. They need to blow it somewhere because there's likely no more room to air anymore ads in the big swing states.
How is it possible that Diablos is acting much worse now?

It has to be a shtick at this point.
 

Mgoblue201

Won't stop picking the right nation
Nate sez:

This is really a more dramatic statement than it might look, since the state polls are done by a variety of different pollsters. Nate is saying that Romney's best hope is that there's a fundamental misunderstanding of the electorate that is causing every single poll to misread the state of the game.

In other words, Romney should be hoping that the polls are...skewed.
I think the prevailing assumption, at least for those who are carefully tracking the polls, is that they are actually underestimating Obama's advantage in the swing states due to several factors (superior ground game, under representation of Latino voters, etc). I think it would be very difficult to argue that there is a systemic bias against Romney in the polls.
 
If someone is using FOX for any sort of reference, they should be immediately smacked upside the head. Same goes for anyone for uses MSNBC.

I mean, if they're using it as a secondary source to something like the NYT, I'm okay w/ someone using FOX/MSNBC as a citation...

...but Pctx doesn't even do that.

Side note RE: Diablos: I want polls of MN, but for the House instead of the presidential toplines
 

Zabka

Member
Believe it or not, people like celebrities, especially young people. That's what makes them celebrities in the first place, their ability to get people to go out and do things like spend $30 and three hours sitting in a dark room watching a movie that almost, but not quite, contains boobs. Getting them to vote is probably comparatively straightforward.

I don't believe it. Can you give an example of a celebrity endorsement that has actually affected this race?

Also if you think people still pay to see boobs you must be 78 years old.
 

pigeon

Banned
I don't believe it. Can you give an example of a celebrity endorsement that has actually affected this race?

eastwood-chair.jpg
 

WaltJay

Member
Can someone, maybe a Minnesotan, explain MN's political leanings? It's the state that has elected Jesse Ventura, Al Franken, Michelle Bachman, Tim Pawlenty, Keith Ellison, and is currently has a 97% chance of being the win column for Obama in this election.

Is MN a solid blue state with a super red district that keeps Bachman employed? I just find it interesting MN elects such a diverse set of politicians. They seem to have the whole spectrum covered. :)
 

andthebeatgoeson

Junior Member

pigeon

Banned
I meant in a positive way. If you think celebrities mainly hurt campaigns then I'd agree.

I'm not sure how you expect me to produce an example of a celebrity endorsement that helps. But you asked why the Obama campaign was invested in them. Here's my answer: they have lots of data and lots of time to focus group, and based on that data, they thought it was a good idea, and we can presume they thought it was a good idea because it'd win them votes. I'm not sure the fact that you don't like them outweighs the fact that OFA clearly does when we're trying to decide how effective they're likely to be.
 

Jackson50

Member
Joe Donnelly has a 7 point lead over Richard Mourdock per his internal.

Mourdock countered by releasing his own internal... Where he's tied!

So I think Donnelly's gonna win this one.
Source?
Obama has a 97% chance of winning Minnesota. Seriously, how on earth can you convince yourself that he's losing that state? There are ELEVEN days left until we vote for a new President and both of these campaigns are sitting on a mountain of money. They need to blow it somewhere because there's likely no more room to air anymore ads in the big swing states. Might as well air some ads in places that neighbor swing states.
What? Romney just purchased $30,000 in ads. That means it's closer than the conventional wisdom.
 
ABC, Reuters, and RAND all moved 2 for Obama. Gallup went 1 for Romney. Ras and ibd nothing.

Silver showed all trackers show tied. Today it's Obama with five his way so far. Need to see the other trackers but so far if others don't change then aggregate is Obama up 0.5.
 

Effect

Member
I don't believe it. Can you give an example of a celebrity endorsement that has actually affected this race?

Also if you think people still pay to see boobs you must be 78 years old.

I don't think it's so much an endorsement but that people will pay attention when a celebrity is on TV. It's why they are used in TV commercials instead of lesser known actors. They're an attention grabber. Use them to grab some viewers attentions and they'll be more likely to listen to what is being said then if it was coming from some unknown voice speaking or from some group they know nothing about.
 

Clevinger

Member
ABC, Reuters, and RAND all moved 2 for Obama. Gallup went 1 for Romney. Ras and ibd nothing.

Silver showed all trackers show tied. Today it's Obama with five his way so far. Need to see the other trackers but so far if others don't change then aggregate is Obama up 0.5.

I thought Cheebs said ABC moved toward Romney.
 

Allard

Member
Source?What? Romney just purchased $30,000 in ads. That means it's closer than the conventional wisdom.

Isn't it possible the 30,000 could be for a cross state ad market buy? I think there was some evidence of Obama and Romney spending money in California due to the proximity to Nevada but no one is entertaining the thought (outside of a joke) of California getting flipped. Minnesota borders 2 hotly contested swings states.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom