Sooner
Member
I don't understand what you're saying. Does EA, Capcom, Sega need a "base console"?They will always need a base console to build games around though so why exit the console business all together
I don't understand what you're saying. Does EA, Capcom, Sega need a "base console"?They will always need a base console to build games around though so why exit the console business all together
If only it was an upgraded version of Forza Horizon 3 instead.
Arguably the greatest arcade racing game of all time.
None of them doing cloud gaming at the level Microsoft is going forI don't understand what you're saying. Does EA, Capcom, Sega need a "base console"?
Phil isn't going to be happy that sony will use that 30% to edge him out of the business.
None of them doing cloud gaming at the level Microsoft is going for
If Microsoft is truly going third-party that no longer matters. They are not going to compete with Sony head-to-head in the console space (at least for now). I think the actual harm could come from Game Pass subscribers leaving. I know everyone looks at it from the perspective of Xbox/PC users but every copy of a game sold on a competing console platform is a customer that will not subscribe to Game Pass. I think that is why we have seen the "walled garden" on consoles topic come up recently and I expect that noise to get louder.Phil isn't going to be happy that sony will use that 30% to edge him out of the business.
We?GOOD!
We don’t want cloud gaming.
Phil isn't going to be happy that sony will use that 30% to edge him out of the business.
None of them doing cloud gaming at the level Microsoft is going for
That old quote shows how little Phil understands his own business. The 30% Sony gets was never what was going to edge Xbox out of the console business.
It is the complete lack of exclusive games that will result in people not buying Xbox consoles and "edge them out of business".
The consoles are used in the cloud architecture. Series X at the moment.What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
The consoles are used in the cloud architecture. Series X at the moment.
But, they don't have to be. Rumor is Microsoft dabbles in the PC space.
Phil no longer cares about Xbox console sales.
It’s a legacy part of their business which is now far from their priority.
Way cheaper too. It was like $12 at Walmart for a whileActually motorfest is better. I have played both games over 500hours.. Nothing beats the grand race experience in motorfest.
I mean…Sony is getting 30% of all sales without spending a dollar on that game so everybody wins reallyAnd M$ loving every second![]()
Forza series is the one things MS can boast about without a single mistake in record. Can't say the same about the other stuff they put outBut, but,but MS don't do compelling games, how is this possible?
Do any Microsoft releases on PC even offer native dualsense support?Hopefully we'll get the dualsense features on PC also.
The person saying Nintendo should take notes looked like they were making fun of the other person who said SIE should take notes from MS on how to make their racing game bigger. I'm guessing if they keep it up, they won't last long there lol.
The other argument - that no one is going to buy a PS to play exclusives - seems to go along with the anti-exclusive sentiment that's showing up more and more. I figure that's not true and also that exclusives can be about serving an existing audience. Not denying that game companies want growth, but it can be about more than that.
But it's free money for MS too?
If sales makes 50 million dollars
MS get 35 mil
Sony 15 mil
Unless my maths sucks that's more a win for Xbox.
They could lower prices if they wished to gain market share (they won't as it's all about shorter term revenue for them)
Software sales bring in the profit hardware does not.
They’ll make over half a billion in revenue off this release if the charts are correct.
Even SoT did 4 million and this to me should sell twice as much.
Because nintendos whole MO from the start of time was about kiddy games. It's their thing.
Sony came out targeting late teens to 35 year olds with the adult console. Of course it's expected that they make more adult orientated games while nintendo continue their legacy of accessible games for all ages.
Tell that to Factor 5
This year for sure given SONY's lack of In-House titles for 2025
If only it was an upgraded version of Forza Horizon 3 instead.
Arguably the greatest arcade racing game of all time.
The ol' "they'll make PlayStation players pay" so they continue throwing away money for Xbox players.
It used to be, "Microsoft makes enough money, so they don't mind that Xbox bleeds money".
You think this cost hardly anything to bring to PS5?There's costs associated for both parties, though. For example, there's development costs on the MS side and distribution costs on Sony's side (downloading from the store, etc.). Though, no matter how you look at it, it's beneficial for both companies, the studios who make the games, and customers. Maybe reducing costs is one of the reasons there's no physical version - not having to spend on that allows MS to gain more revenue/profit.
MK8 retails for $299 with a free accessory to play it.Yep, and you also got a Switch free
i already own them on steam, but ill sure as hell double dip for ps5 pro version. also hoping eventually they will remaster first horizon
You think this cost hardly anything to bring to PS5?
If Microsoft is truly going third-party that no longer matters. They are not going to compete with Sony head-to-head in the console space (at least for now). I think the actual harm could come from Game Pass subscribers leaving. I know everyone looks at it from the perspective of Xbox/PC users but every copy of a game sold on a competing console platform is a customer that will not subscribe to Game Pass. I think that is why we have seen the "walled garden" on consoles topic come up recently and I expect that noise to get louder.
And for that $35 million, Microsoft lose out on:
1: Console hardware sales, meaning they lose out on...2: Main vector for driving Game Pass subscription growth, and...3: 3P software sales, due to lower console sales, meaning...4: Less B2P 3P sales revenue, also...5: Less 30% cuts from 3P B2P sales, and...6: Less 3P MTX sales, meaning...7: Less 30% cuts from 3P MTX sales, also...8: Less peripheral sales, due to less consoles being sold, meaning...9: Less cuts on 3P peripheral sales & less profit from 1P peripheral sales overall
That $35 million off PlayStation isn't covering for all of that.
And if the game sales more PS5s & Accessories?But it's free money for MS too?
If sales makes 50 million dollars
MS get 35 mil
Sony 15 mil
Unless my maths sucks that's more a win for Xbox.
They could lower prices if they wished to gain market share (they won't as it's all about shorter term revenue for them)
And if the game sales more PS5s & Accessories?
They can’t be compared. One’s a sim lite, the other is an open world party racer.A proper racing game. It's better than GT7.
*runs away*
1: Console hardware sales, meaning they lose out on...
You guys said the same thing last year.
Then Helldivers 2 and Astro Bot happened, and overshadowed everything Microsoft threw out that year. Yes, even COD (certainly in terms of reception and critical praise, plus being the "hot new thing").
I guess PlayStation will have to teach the lesson again this year? Because in terms of confirmed stuff only Take Two and Nintendo will have bigger-caliber releases in 2025.
The point is that Microsoft ALREADY lost all of that, they are at rock bottom
Figured, but maybe one day they do something. FH and FH2 are still quite bad on emulationThose seem unlikely because of licensing issues around music and cars.
You're a Generation fanboy who can't seem to work out that Arrowhead isn't In-House much less can work out that in terms of In-House titles, no one is coming close to Xbox in 2025
and I'm not a big fan of COD btw.
SIE own the Helldivers IP so yes, it's considered in-house by the fact SIE hold the rights. Guess you can make a 10+ million hit without needing to try buying up the whole industry after all, whodathunk?
And there's still the high likelihood that Ghosts of Yotei performs better in sales & acclaim than any Microsoft release this year aside COD which will probably do more in B2P. And have you forgotten Nintendo is releasing a new system this year? If there's a new 3D Mario at launch, it's a wrap. That's gonna be GOTY easy and also outsell every MS release plus at worst, match COD in sales.
Not me hating or fanboying, just speaking realistic likelihoods. Also doesn't mean I'm calling MS's 2025 slate "trash". But the idea they're gonna suddenly leapfrog SIE & Nintendo with their 2025 lineup is quite hilarious. Maybe wait 'till next year?![]()
What is total sales for Ghost Of Tsushima, on PS?
Sony sequel sales seem to be in decline, which I cant get my head around so it will be interesting to see how it performs.
They’re in decline because a lot of the previous entries were heavily bundled on PS4.
What is total sales for Ghost Of Tsushima, on PS?
Sony sequel sales seem to be in decline, which I cant get my head around so it will be interesting to see how it performs.
What is total sales for Ghost Of Tsushima, on PS?
Sony sequel sales seem to be in decline, which I cant get my head around so it will be interesting to see how it performs.
SIE own the Helldivers IP so yes, it's considered in-house by the fact SIE hold the rights.
I doubt that Helldivers sold better than Helldivers 2
You mean games that were lightning in a bottle selling more than any PlayStation games in other generations 15 & 20 million only selling 10 to 15 million in the transition to a new generation?I mean, yeah lol. A top down isometric indie game vs a full sized AAA game with 8 years development. lol
I mean Horizon, spider man, god of war Ragnarök. Actual Sony 1st party studio games.
I mean, yeah lol. A top down isometric indie game vs a full sized AAA game with 8 years development. lol
I mean Horizon, spider man, god of war Ragnarök. Actual Sony 1st party studio games.
Half a billion? Then playstation will get over 200 million vs Microsofts 500 million. Remember the 30% cut to playstation for the software sales and in game purchases.The $35 million that keeps getting thrown around on one commentators hypothetical math covering things is laughable to keep bringing up.
This old game will bring in over half a billion in revenue for Microsoft...
I couldn't figure it out, this confirms why you kept saying in house.You're a Generation fanboy who can't seem to work out that Arrowhead isn't In-House much less can work out that in terms of In-House titles, no one is coming close to Xbox in 2025
and I'm not a big fan of COD btw.