DoktorEvil
Banned
This is why it's a losing battle for gamers. I believe GZ was the game that started this debate. I enjoyed the shit out of the Deja Vu mission plus I was funding TPP so I was happy.
Pat mentioning gun star heroes was 3 hours and 90 bucks... That's unacceptable.
I personally think cost should be taken into consideration for reviews. The type of person who doesn't worry about the time to cost value of the games they're buying aren't using reviews as buying advice anyway.
If you're an 18 year old with no steady income who can maybe get a game every couple months, needs to know if a game is going to last. What constitutes long enough varies from person to person, but it should be taken into consideration.
So do I, because I'd be reassured that the biggest gameplay hours per 60 bucks values would all fall in the RPG genre and I love RPGs!
But the 20-30 something buying video games does not have the time to invest into a 60-100 hour game like xenogears or Xenoblade for example.
Short games at 60 are cool if the consumer knows it's a short game and it's demo understands why it's short.