Won’t change a thing if it still has their shit launcher.Ubisoft feeling that pressure. AC Shadows release on Steam cometh. Muhahaha
Jesus Christ, this is bad.
Right current living cost, amount of games available, 70 price tag and games that are time sink aka live services mean you must do something fresh.This day in age, it has to hit at least an 80.
Player-centric approach baby! Let’s dream big.Won’t change a thing if it still has their shit launcher.
To you think a company publicly acknowledging 3.9/5 for SW IP is happy with the results?Did it really tank or did you add that part yourself?
Below 80 for games only with 75% off if it is a genre I really enjoy. Time is short on life. I want play just what is good.76 is a solid rating? I consider any game below 80 MC as not worth playing.
They're clearly not happy, but not being happy and "tanking" are not quite the same. Concord tanked.To you think a company publicly acknowledging 3.9/5 for SW IP is happy with the results?
They're clearly not happy, but not being happy and "tanking" are not quite the same. Concord tanked.
You should decide if the game is good or not. Don't let some "journalist" or petty (or troll) individuals determine that for you. Maybe you won't like overall 90 points game. Maybe you'll love below overall 80 games. Hell, I love lots of below 70 games myself, lots of hidden gems there.Below 80 for games only with 75% off if it is a genre I really enjoy. Time is short on life. I want play just what is good.
With a lightsaber.Make her sexy with pretty face, give her skimpy clothes and I bet you more people will buy it
Nah.... IMO, it's not just the fact that she's unattractive. Gaming's got a fair amount of unattractive characters. The problem for me is that her image is more cursed than ugly. Like, it's just mad uncanny valley. I can handle an ugly protagonist. What I can't handle is a character that looks like an AI's failed attempt of approximating a human face. Everything about is just off. I can't adequately explain it, but it makes me uncomfortable to look at it.imagine tanking your company just baucause you wouldnt make your character slightly attactive.
lol.
You should decide if the game is good or not. Don't let some "journalist" or petty (or troll) individuals determine that for you. Maybe you won't like overall 90 points game. Maybe you'll love below overall 80 games. Hell, I love lots of below 70 games myself, lots of hidden gems there.
Point system is good indicator but just for a starting point. Not for everything.
Physical only data and also incomplete.
Ubisofts games are too big and mass marketed to be commercial failures.
The shitty Valhalla sold upwards of 15m last estimate, probably closer to or above 20m by now. This will sell 10m easy.
Also, if using the leaked Marvel licensing is an example, it's $9m for licensing plus additional small percentages off of revenue. I don't think Ubi is gonna have any trouble with that.
Star Wars Outlaws initial sales proved softer than expected
To be fair a 76 to Ubisoft is treated like a 96.I'm pretty sure they don't really consider a 76 Metacritic Score a solid rating.
Especially for a AAA or AAAA game.76 metacritic score is pretty bad lol
With the amount of review score inflation you pretty much expect all decent games to have 80's Metascore76 is not bad at all, since when does every game have to be 80 plus to be considered good.
Normally I'd agree with that statement but in this case, with the Star Wars brand, and for how long AND how many people worked on it, plus the hype they built up for this game, an 85 really should've been the minimum they should expect... But hey, 76 for such an important game is fine if they say so.76 is not bad at all, since when does every game have to be 80 plus to be considered good.
To give Ubisoft credit - at least they are learning (maybe).
Yeah this game really should have gone the Mass Effect route, either male or female protagonist with a character creator.Just add a male hero with a normal head.
Outlaws is a great game and it really doesn't need a god damn lightsaber. Its focus on stealth action exploration gameplay is great.With a lightsaber.
Outlaws ship has sailed. Nobody is buying that shit full priced around Black Friday on Steam. Its an issue of Ubi's own making.Only a brand new game absent any issues that is just about good gameplay and stories that looks great and becomes popular will course correct for Ubisoft, Outlaws and Shadows won't achieve that now IMO.
76 is a decent score for an indie or AA studio, like say some of the Euro ones producing decent but not great RPGs. 76 for a hyped AAAa Star Wars game is a huge issue.I'll say it again, irrespective of all the hoopla about the in-game model of the protagonist, if you're gonna make a story in the Star Wars Universe that isn't centered around the Jedi-Sith conflict (i.e. fucking cool space wizards who give the entire IP its appeal), then your writing and production needed to be fucking top tier.
This simply wasn't. A 76 MC score is pretty bad considering media outlets rarely use the full scale. So not only did Ubisoft ship a Star Wars game with no Jedi, they also shipped a poorly made Star Wars game with no Jedi and also a shitty 3D model for the protagonist.
It was really a perfect storm of horse shit that nobody wanted to play.
I hate to say this but I have a feeling this general decline in quality is partly due to excessive diversity hires versus looking for competent programmers artists game Devs etc.True, i like this take on the story.
Ubisoft in the 2000s was Rockstar level.
Each game was so exciting to play, from about 2014 onwards it's been a downward trajectory.
Here's hoping this re-focus slims Ubisoft down and they go back to creating quality games and not pump out repetative shit every 2 years.
Well that worked for Fallout, it's bigger than ever now.Star Was franchise is a 76 now?
Oops. That's not good. Especially for a company that's fought off at least 2 hostile takeovers. Please don't let the shitty Saudi royal family buy them.