Doesn't everyone?
Doesn't everyone?
Sony presser theater tickets on sale in one minute.
They all really really wanted that $5 PSN credit.
They always start out great but fall apart in the middle and leave you wanting moreDoesn't everyone?
Doesn't everyone?
Got Rogers 100u internet installed yesterday. I've been getting anywhere from 140 Mbps to 170 Mbps down, which is pretty nice. Wonder how consistent that will be as I'm only paying for 100 down?
Doesn't everyone?
You're probably not getting that speed after the speedboost comes down and it's much more likely you're going to be hitting the 100 you're paying for at least.
I didn't try since I'll be at the actual conference in LA. Got in via the MVP program. E3 Mystery Box gonna be sweet.
prizes for meetup? ?
48ºC in India. I guess time for #teamwarm to move there?
I think the logo for the 2016 NBA All Star game that was unveiled today looks great!
I hope your hair gets frostbite >=[48ºC in India. I guess time for #teamwarm to move there?
It isn't post road, it's Yonge/mount pleasant/Eglinton, there are plenty of small detacheds and semis, a lot of young families with little kids, these aren't people wearing monocles walking their poodles, they aren't poor for sure but they're not filthy rich either, there are retirees and young dual income families. It's a different feel living in houses that all look a little different than a gigantic complex trying to duplicate that subdivision feel.
haha
That entire lawrence area has always been one of the wealthiest neighbourhoods in the city.
do we have access to any tvs at this victory cafe
wouldnt mind bringing my wiiu
Yeah but a 50 minute train commute from the city.
Either we have a lot more mid rises or a lot more social housing to try to put a damper on the overheated real estate market within the city. Both of these things are exactly what are protested and tried to stop though.
Edit: Considering how prices are shooting up we need a hell of a lot more mid rises in Mississauga and, hell, Milton as well. Mid rise corridors also make it more feasible to put better transit in.
Mid rises are how Western Europe has achieved density along with a high quality of life. They don't have a whole lot of Yonge Street style high rises.
presented without comment
It isn't post road, it's Yonge/mount pleasant/Eglinton, there are plenty of small detacheds and semis, a lot of young families with little kids, these aren't people wearing monocles walking their poodles, they aren't poor for sure but they're not filthy rich either, there are retirees and young dual income families. It's a different feel living in houses that all look a little different than a gigantic complex trying to duplicate that subdivision feel.
It's not crazy Markham people trying to send their kids to PET, but the schools are decent and people speak English. I don't get the hate.
There already is a low rise one block North on Sherwood and another one on Yonge, maybe people just don't want that kind of monstrosity getting put up, there's not exactly a lack of low rises in that particular pocket if it's on Keewatin.
It isn't post road, it's Yonge/mount pleasant/Eglinton, there are plenty of small detacheds and semis, a lot of young families with little kids, these aren't people wearing monocles walking their poodles, they aren't poor for sure but they're not filthy rich either, there are retirees and young dual income families. It's a different feel living in houses that all look a little different than a gigantic complex trying to duplicate that subdivision feel.
It's not crazy Markham people trying to send their kids to PET, but the schools are decent and people speak English. I don't get the hate.
There already is a low rise one block North on Sherwood and another one on Yonge, maybe people just don't want that kind of monstrosity getting put up, there's not exactly a lack of low rises in that particular pocket if it's on Keewatin.
Mid rises lead to high rises, it's inevitable. I think people need to walk along that section of Yonge (start from Davisville) to see all the mid rises already in the area, you have buildings but things are still nice, you start encroaching into pockets of houses then you're looking at Yonge/Sheppard/Finch, there's no more character in the neighborhood, it's all cookie cutter townhouses and condos over there. It's a great neighborhood right now in North Toronto, that's what people are fighting for.
They explicitly said their complaint was that the development would lower their property values. I would be far more open to your interpretation of innocent home owners afraid that their neighbourhood would change character if they hadn't literally said they're most concerned about their 2 million dollar homes losing value after 500k homeowners move in.
I still think their concerns are valid. No one buying a $2 million house wants fancy townhouses in the area. I just can't understand how the rights of a prospective developer who only cares about maximizing profits takes precedent over existing residents.
Adds...flavour and character?I feel a little uneasy if I eat at a Korean restaurant that isn't a *little* run down.
It doesn't need to be dilapidated, it just needs the atmosphere of it being there a while.
Well there's the developer who owns the property, the existing residents of the area, the city, and the prospective future residents looking for cheaper housing as well in the mix. It's not just two groups.
Lol, I don't care much about the capitalist developer, the city who can never make the correct decision, or the prospective future residents, who really don't even exist at this point, looking for cheaper (lol $500K) housing in a well established, expensive area.
People seem to think these evil, rich homeowners are trying to crush a charity or something, when really in fact, each party is trying to do what benefits them, and only them, best. Yet when the existing homeowners do so, it's NIMBY. Ironically, what is appealing about these townhouse condo things is that they aren't surrounded by other condos.
I still think their concerns are valid. No one buying a $2 million house wants fancy townhouses in the area. I just can't understand how the rights of a prospective developer who only cares about maximizing profits takes precedent over existing residents.
Lol, I don't care much about the capitalist developer, the city who can never make the correct decision, or the prospective future residents, who really don't even exist at this point, looking for cheaper (lol $500K) housing in a well established, expensive area.
People seem to think these evil, rich homeowners are trying to crush a charity or something, when really in fact, each party is trying to do what benefits them, and only them, best. Yet when the existing homeowners do so, it's NIMBY. Ironically, what is appealing about these townhouse condo things is that they aren't surrounded by other condos.
I still think their concerns are valid. No one buying a $2 million house wants fancy townhouses in the area. I just can't understand how the rights of a prospective developer who only cares about maximizing profits takes precedent over existing residents.
But the idea that property values will decrease because of fancy midrises being built is groundless.
And I shed few tears for homeowners trying to protect their home value that's only that high due to a bubble caused by not having enough housing in the first place. Sure they are only acting in their own interests, but so are a lot of people doing dickish things.
Plus I am a big fan of these midrises that are popping up. A good solution to density issues without having to build giant towers everywhere.
Now if only they would fix the transportation
Marcia Visser, the Density Creep Neighborhood Alliance (DCNA) group spokesperson, apologized for the original comments and stressed their campaign is against the developers, not the potential new neighbours on Keewatin Ave. in midtown Toronto.
I don't think it will factor into the decision much in an overheated real estate market like Toronto's.You think anyone buying a house for $2 mil is like, "Oh look honey, townhouse condos! I love the population density around here."?
Yea, I was really worried about where someone who can afford a $500k townhouse condo was going to live.
Wait: ‘Density creep’ crusaders hit back at developers for bending rules
Is that this street? https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Keewatin+Ave,+Toronto,+ON/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x882b332646723f0b:0xe5493abc759c7c65?sa=X&ei=h21nVe7zBY2SyASK2YGQAw&ved=0CB0Q8gEwAA
Well you don't have to care, but 500k is a good price for starting families in Toronto
Yes, that's the street
I don't really get their complaints when there are literally several 15+ floor high rises next door to the planned site.
Also, zoning bylaws are meant to be changed. That's how they work. They are not a set of rules carved in stone, forever dictating the rules of the street.
Thank god that thing is finally gone. I remember going to a wedding reception there when I was a kid and it was so horrible that my dad took my cousins and brothers and I (7 of us total) to McDonald's because the food was so bad. My mom's cousin (it was her wedding) still apologizes about picking that piece of shit for her wedding reception almost 30 years later.Frand worked on this documentary thats comin
http://www.thestar.com/business/2015/05/28/captain-johns-pulls-away-from-toronto-berth.html
Goodbye to them stomach aches.
They specifically said they don't want their property values lowered by townhouses that would "only" cost $500,000.