Orbis Tabula
Member
Yessssss. Thank you!
Love the improved avatar. You're only cool if your accessory also has a hat.
Yessssss. Thank you!
So you were saying it's a bad decision to go to court this quickly not for legal reasons but because Democrats might not vote for him if he does?
That wasn't a clarification.
I'm wondering specifically which of Rubio's policies you like/dislike vs Clinton's policies you like/dislike.
That comes from the top. It's the complete opposite of Obama's no drama approach to controlling his campaign. Whereas Sanders' abrasive style is clearly mirrored by the amateurs that make up his staff.I'm astonished at that press conference honestly. It came way too soon. It should have been a minute tops of "we take this very seriously and co-operating with the DNC and the vendor to get to the bottom of what happened", tempers are clearly running too high over there at the moment
Make sure you choose the option for more questions in each category.Doing isidewith again to see what it comes up with.
I mean, it's hard. So many of the questions require a fill-in for me.
You realize that these are more of a suggestion than a scientific process. This might give completely different answers: http://www.ontheissues.org/Quiz/Quiz2014.asp?quiz=Pres2016 You should use them not as a definitive answer but as a helpful suggestion as which candidates you should examine in further detail.Doing isidewith again to see what it comes up with.
I mean, it's hard. So many of the questions require a fill-in for me.
True. I'm sure there could be dozens of voters ready to jump ship over a staffer data beach.Yes? He wants to win the democratic primaries, and that press conference was a fiasco. Totally the wrong approach to this in every way.
His team did something wrong - this is an admitted fact. Instead of a mild 'we are co/operating etc', they got onstage, blamed everyone else in an angry rant and threatened to sue to get access back to the thing they abused in the first place!
It's not just bad in terms of this episode, it's also bad because it plays into the wider image he has of being an angry, shouting candidate. And people generally won't be favourable on someone whose campaign screwed up and then ran to the courts immediately whilst blaming everyone else. It's not a good look on anyone.
Also, how involved is Bernie at this point? Obviously he didn't know about the data shennanigans until shit hit the fan, but surely his campaign wouldn't have made the "to the courts" threat without checking with him. Right?
Sanders and Paul voters are probably the most likely to abandon their candidate of choice over minor mishaps.True. I'm sure there could be dozens of voters ready to jump ship over a staffer data beach.
You realize that these are more of a suggestion than a scientific process. This might give completely different answers: http://www.ontheissues.org/Quiz/Quiz2014.asp?quiz=Pres2016 You should use them not as a definitive answer but as a helpful suggestion as which candidates you should examine in further detail.
And then not vote because voting is useless.
I'm withholding judgement until we know exactly the extent of what happened. However, this, again, just shows the level of incompetence Bernie has surrounded himself with. I mean, I know the pickings weren't great, but come on. They've pretty much bungled this in every way possible. First, they claim it's a low level staffer...when it wasn't. Then they claim it was just one guy, when it probably wasn't (although we don't know for certain). Now, they're throwing a hissy fit for being temporarily locked out of the database....because someone in their campaign did something stupid.
I think Bernie is a good man who surrounded himself with a bunch of bastards. They have, literally, destroyed his campaign from day one. It's ridiculous. Here he was, going into the debate with news of reaching his 2 million donors and whatever that union endorsement was...and what do they manage to do? This. Well done.
I hate seeing this because in the very unlikely possibility he's our nominee, shit like this destroys your campaign. The GOP would take this and run to the fucking presses for weeks.
That wasn't a clarification.
I'm wondering specifically which of Rubio's policies you like/dislike vs Clinton's policies you like/dislike.
I'm sure he dragged and dropped the folders into the thumb drive himself.Also, how involved is Bernie at this point? Obviously he didn't know about the data shennanigans until shit hit the fan, but surely his campaign wouldn't have made the "to the courts" threat without checking with him. Right?
Congrats! Welcome to the club!Sometimes I just read and then take a step away from the computer. IT's better for my health. I have a child coming after all.
It's just that bird law in this country; it's not governed by reason.
You realize that these are more of a suggestion than a scientific process. This might give completely different answers: http://www.ontheissues.org/Quiz/Quiz2014.asp?quiz=Pres2016 You should use them not as a definitive answer but as a helpful suggestion as which candidates you should examine in further detail.
And then not vote because voting is useless.
This time with Clinton and Carson. I swear it's different each time. The fill-ins is what fucks me up each time. Of course one shouldn't vote based solely on an online random quiz, that would be asinine. I will look at your link.
Congrats! Welcome to the club!
Yeah I agree. I like Bernie. I honestly agree with more of his policies than Hillary (although this is a case of like 98% Bernie vs 90% Hillary), and I would absolutely support him if he were the nominee. I came to the same conclusion that a lot of people did though, where I'd vote for Bernie in the primaries, and go with Hillary once she wins the nom.
But this? He's picked a staff that's screwed up at every major hurdle. Even if he wins the presidency, that makes me extremely nervous that he would be able to pick good appointments once he's in office, given how poorly he's chosen a campaign staff
Sometimes I just read and then take a step away from the computer. IT's better for my health. I have a child coming after all.
I...I mean this genuinely. How do you...agree with Ben Carson on science?but that gets me ridiculed.
I mean, I just got unexpected results again.
This time with Clinton and Carson. I swear it's different each time. The fill-ins is what fucks me up each time. Of course one shouldn't vote based solely on an online random quiz, that would be asinine. I will look at your link.
I...I mean this genuinely. How do you...agree with Ben Carson on science?
Your first I take it? Girls are the best. The first 2 weeks are rough, but then you'll be a pro in time. When you first see her, your entire life will change instantaneouslyThanks. Baby girl coming March 2nd. Kinda freaking out.
Lol DWS attacking Sanders in CNN as if he was a GOP candidate. Shameful person.
We're lawyers!The government used to protect us from tyranny against the seizure of tasteful, artistic photographs of beautiful bodies. That same government wants to come in to our homes and tell us what is or is not art? That's not right!
Your first I take it? Girls are the best. The first 2 weeks are rough, but then you'll be a pro in time. When you first see her, your entire life will change instantaneously![]()
You should see MSNBC then, the fired staffer admitted to making copies of the data. Of course he says it was to prove it could be done. Neither Bernie nor the DNC is going to come out of this looking good, both are going to look like utter morons once it's all settled.
It's my first. My wife and I waited until we were more financially set, in a good house and a good neighborhood. So we're "ready" but not ready if you know what I mean. They're not born with instruction manuals after all lol.
Everyone has mixed opinions one which are easier or not. Ideally I wanted one of each boy and girl. I have a feeling Karma will bite me in the ass and she's gonna be a handful. We're very excited though.
The courts threat isn't over whether the staffer did or did not do anything, it's about the fact that the Sanders campaign's data is also with VAN, so the DNC aren't just locking him out of Democratic data, they're locking him out of his *own* data - hence the legal challenge.
Honestly, I don't think this reflects well on the DNC, either.
There is absolutely no consitency. How can my top pick in one quiz be my last in another?
I am done with these quizzes.
There is absolutely no consitency. How can my top pick in one quiz be my last in another?
And Chris Christie? That guy doesn't believe in vaccines. I can't take them and depend on herd immunity... His thought process could kill me! Like, shit man...
I don't think anyone thinks the court threat is about what the staffer did - its about access to the data. But given the Sander's campaign has done something very wrong, and their guy is even admitting to making copies of data on live TV, not giving them access back is completely reasonable given its not even been 24 hours.
I am done with these quizzes.
There is absolutely no consitency. How can my top pick in one quiz be my last in another?
And Chris Christie? That guy doesn't believe in vaccines. I can't take them and depend on herd immunity... His thought process could kill me! Like, shit man...
Maybe I am the proof that these quizzes are bullshit?
That's why you shouldn't use quizzes to decide who to vote for. Look up their policies and form your own opinion.
He doesn't exactly have a big pool to select from right now; he literally has to pick whatever's available, which obviously isn't true of a presidential situation.
No. Separating them from DNC data - fine, sure, I've said so as much myself. Separating them from the Sanders' campaign's own data created by the campaign itself? Absolute bullshit. If that's not restored, I fully favour a court case.
I did, but people ask for the quizzes.
My opinion? Clinton can't be trusted, Sanders May or may not be connected to similar reasons that I would never vote for Clinton, making me a possible hypocrite should things go down and I vote for him, Trump has some interesting things I like, but is full of hate and anti-constitutional beliefs, and sanders I believe is the least damaging republican candidate, while I have dealt with Rubio as a Floridian and don't like him, but see him as Trump's strongest opposition.
I think to me, Rubio is definitely worth a deeper look.
I did, but people ask for the quizzes.
My opinion? Clinton can't be trusted, Sanders May or may not be connected to similar reasons that I would never vote for Clinton, making me a possible hypocrite should things go down and I vote for him, Trump has some interesting things I like, but is full of hate and anti-constitutional beliefs, and sanders I believe is the least damaging republican candidate, while I have dealt with Rubio as a Floridian and don't like him, but see him as Trump's strongest opposition.
I think to me, Rubio is definitely worth a deeper look.
These are not policy based views, breh. These are platitudes. You're voting based on a feeling.
Oh no, that just my opinions on them. I would never vote for feelings. If I did, I would not have voted Obama in 2012. Always vote on policy, always vote on issues.
If you honestly need it you should just open Excel and lay out all your stances on various issues in a spreadsheet. Then figure out what are your priorities, find the candidate that matches your priorities most, and vote.Oh no, that just my opinions on them. I would never vote for feelings. If I did, I would not have voted Obama in 2012. Always vote on policy, always vote on issues.
So what's important to you?Oh no, that just my opinions on them. I would never vote for feelings. If I did, I would not have voted Obama in 2012. Always vote on policy, always vote on issues.
I guess what's important to me is not what's important to a lot of people? Maybe politics isn't for me.