Well it certainly did not perform how it was advertised to. Considering the broken state it was released in, could it not be said that they owe us what was advertised? Not only by them but also by Nvidia with their promotion of the gameworks features in a 60fps video when the game not only released with a 30fps cap but struggled to meet even 30fps on PCs well beyond the recommended specs, not to mention the various texture streaming issues too.
It's definitely what's best for them and I would say they at least owe us that for the money we spent on it but I certainly don't expect or feel they owe us anymore than that.
In some places it is illegal to misrepresent the product you sell
...
On behalf of all juniors on GAF, I apologize for this post.
Do you realize what you're typing? What the hell is this? They most definitely owe all the customers to make a game that's not a broken piece of unfinished shit. Noone buys a game to run like shit on a titan x.
Maybe my post was a bit rash; there's obviously a lot of nuace to this. First of all I just want to say that any claim if false advertisment obviously isn't true, unless I've missed something. Nothing of what they've shown is unattainable. Sure, it might take $6000 to do so, but that's totally irrelevant.
What I wanted to say was that we live in a world where most of the responsibility is on the consumer. You buy the products that you think are good, and it's up to you to do your own research. If the prodyct you bought doesn't work to a degree that satisfies you then that's your own fault. Maybe you should have done more research, or, in the worst case scenario, you get a refund.
That's what I'm getting at. You bought a broken product; that's your own fault. If this bothers you you don't call the manufacturer and force them to fix it, and you ceratainly don't ask them to give you a bunch of free stuff as "compensation". Instead, you call them and ask for a refund. Get a refund.
There's probabaly a lot I'm missing here, but this is where I'm currently at.
