Seriously.
Nothing but trash. Not even meme'ing here. Just trash scammers. This is beyond incompetence. I'm never buying a WB/Rocksteady video game ever again. At this rate we'll get a fix with the GOTY edition.
GarbageDunno if it's been already posted:
http://www.pcgamer.com/batman-arkham-knight-wont-be-finished-this-season-according-to-source/
Batman: Arkham Knight won't be finished this season, according to source
It's not that it needs that long to be fixed. It's that once its fixed, they're going to need to strategize a new release window.
You don't honestly think they'll just re-release the game as soon as it's fixed do you? They have to factor in market competition, avoid cannibalizing sales from one of their own games, season trends, etc. Just like they would with any new release.
This is business, son. WB gives no fucks about how you feel (especially if they already have your money). Otherwise they wouldn't have released it in this state to begin with.
I'm pretty sure part of it is also waiting until they're finished making the DLC, so they'll have some free hands on deck to finally get around to fixing the PC verison.
Dunno if it's been already posted:
http://www.pcgamer.com/batman-arkham-knight-wont-be-finished-this-season-according-to-source/
Batman: Arkham Knight won't be finished this season, according to source
Addressing the PC performance issues is still our top priority and at this time, we believe we have identified a number of fixes for the larger issues that were affecting PC players at launch. These fixes are currently being implemented into the game and once we have been able to do some initial testing, well have a better idea on the status of our progress. Well provide an update on how things are developing next week.
The game isn't even that good.
Seen as GMG failed to refund me as i requested I've played 5 hours at 30fps maxed out (with smoke etc) downsampling from 3k to 1080p with the 30fps lock since the last patch which improved the visuals and fixed AO/rain.
I'm not experiencing any stutter or any framerate issues with those settings on my rig but my god the game is dull. Mindless combat and the batmobille is just so poorly implemented IMO. It's just not much fun and I have very little desire to keep playing.
I deeply regret buying and preordering this game at all, never mind the fact that it has issues on the PC.
Is there any way to force Playstation button icons?
If I load up Batman with my Dualshock 4 plugged in, it recognizes it and shows PS icons, but the controller doesn't work.
If I quit and then start up my DS4 Windows, then launch the game, now the controller works but I get Xbox button prompts. I'm fine playing like that, but I'd prefer the PS icons if I can get them.
Is there any way to force Playstation button icons?
If I load up Batman with my Dualshock 4 plugged in, it recognizes it and shows PS icons, but the controller doesn't work.
If I quit and then start up my DS4 Windows, then launch the game, now the controller works but I get Xbox button prompts. I'm fine playing like that, but I'd prefer the PS icons if I can get them.
I need some advice on a situation I have. About a month and a half ago I bought the GTX 960 MSI Gaming edition 2G, and given that they had bundle it with Arkham Knight, a game I was eager to play, it seemed like the perfect time. Since I was short on money I just went for the 2G edition, thinking that 4Gb of ram was unneccesary and not worth the 35 dollars difference (that's the difference between the two versions here in Chile). Sadly for me, after Arkham Knight release, the textures option clearly states that a 3Gb or higher graphic's card is needed in order to play at normal, otherwise I just have to do with low textures. This bothers me a lot since I can play other demanding games like Crysis 3 or Assassin's Creed IV and Unity on high-ultra settings.
The thing is, I can't ask for a refund and then buy a 4G, I would have to sell it myself and only then buy the new one, so my question is, do you think it's worth it?
My complete PC specs are:
-Intel Core i5-3570k
-6 GB RAM
-1TB HDD
-GTX 960 Gaming edition 2G
I need some advice on a situation I have. About a month and a half ago I bought the GTX 960 MSI Gaming edition 2G, and given that they had bundle it with Arkham Knight, a game I was eager to play, it seemed like the perfect time. Since I was short on money I just went for the 2G edition, thinking that 4Gb of ram was unneccesary and not worth the 35 dollars difference (that's the difference between the two versions here in Chile). Sadly for me, after Arkham Knight release, the textures option clearly states that a 3Gb or higher graphic's card is needed in order to play at normal, otherwise I just have to do with low textures. This bothers me a lot since I can play other demanding games like Crysis 3 or Assassin's Creed IV and Unity on high-ultra settings.
The thing is, I can't ask for a refund and then buy a 4G, I would have to sell it myself and only then buy the new one, so my question is, do you think it's worth it?
My complete PC specs are:
-Intel Core i5-3570k
-6 GB RAM
-1TB HDD
-GTX 960 Gaming edition 2G
No one? Please
Has WB or Rocksteady commented on the "not fixed til Spring" thing?
Yeah, don't run DS4 Windows at all. Game natively supports a Dualshock 4.
Game is such a clusterfuck. It's using over 10GB of main memory and 6GB of graphics memory.
What do you mean exceed what's physically available?
What do you mean exceed what's physically available?
Wired*
The Vram on your graphics card, if the game assigns too much data to it, is it a common thing for games to just then also use standard (slower) ram for data that was originally intended to be used for fast ram only?
Is this a common procedure or is this always an error (memory leak or bad programming)?
I'm not a programmer so I don't know that, but from a logical perspective it doesn't sound like a good ideo to build the game in such a way that it will ever go beyond the limit on any given machine out there?
So like... this game?The only other option would be to simply crash. It also devastates performance...
I've read this many times now, can somebody explain to me how this even works?
People are looking at third party apps that show the memory usage and it is exceeding whats physically available?
Is it normal for most games to never exceed this limit (If you have 2, it always stays under it, likewise with 12) so this is the best indication that something is horribly wrong?
This game is the "E.T." of this generation
Interim patch target is August
http://community.wbgames.com/t5/Official-Announcements/PC-Update-July-17th/m-p/619744#M97
Interim patch target is August
http://community.wbgames.com/t5/Official-Announcements/PC-Update-July-17th/m-p/619744#M97