terrdactycalsrock
Member
How you gonna take a stab at Martha? I mean c'mon, man.
I saw someone else taking a shot at Martha today. I thought she was an excellent companion
How you gonna take a stab at Martha? I mean c'mon, man.
How you gonna take a stab at Martha? I mean c'mon, man.
I'm not super big on Rose, but having recently rewatched the whole show, I think a lot of Rose's time is just the show struggling to find its footing. She's not bad with Tennant, but the whole Eccleston era is a bit wonky, with farting aliens and stuff.
I'm not super big on Rose, but having recently rewatched the whole show, I think a lot of Rose's time is just the show struggling to find its footing. She's not bad with Tennant, but the whole Eccleston era is a bit wonky, with farting aliens and stuff.
I saw someone else taking a shot at Martha today. I thought she was an excellent companion
I feel the exact opposite about Rose. She works great with Eccleston, but with Tennant in Series 2 she really comes off as obnoxious.
The 9/Rose dynamic worked wonders.
Five-ish Doctors Reboot is freaking hilarious. Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy and Peter Davison had great chemistry together.
I was not a fan of the abusive undertones going on between 9 and Rose. Like the episode where they argue and he storms off and she's all "You'll be back!" Their relationship was not positive to me.
I was not a fan of the abusive undertones going on between 9 and Rose. Like the episode where they argue and he storms off and she's all "You'll be back!" Their relationship was not positive to me.
That's all well and good, but:The stuff on Trenzalore is real... The TARDIS is real (and it's proven to be "his" TARDIS), there's even a "body". How can 12 exist if 1-11 are stuck in that timestream on Trenzalore? If he regenerates instead of dying, then everything that happened on Trenzalore in "The Name of the Doctor" ceases to be, because he'll take the TARDIS and his body with him when he leaves that place. No, there's going to be something else going on, not just a misunderstanding on his part. Probably something that we can't even fathom, that will allow him to both "die" there, leaving behind both his body and the TARDIS, and still allow the Twelfth to walk away.
Did the Doctor change history or was the ending what actually always happened? Wasn't clear if they actually broke the time lock or is it another impossible astronaut situation.
It's not explicitly stated. I think however that John Hurt being regretful in the Doctor's timestream in Name of the Doctor points to they changed history.
It's what always happened. It's written in such a way that it's a reveal, not a retcon. It's always happened that way but memory loss and the aftermath led the Doctor (and whoever else would've looked into it) into thinking it happened the old way.
Basically the same as the doctor's "dying" at Lake Silencio.
Tennants clone doctor?
EDIT: Post above me
Sort of? The way they undid it, then did it, then undid doing it to undo it again.. I'm not entirely sure if it really was supposed to always be that way at Lake Silencio. At least this movie didn't get THAT timey wimey.
I guess this is as good of a time as any to ask. What is Time Lord weaponry like? I've wondered about it for a while now, but of course the Doctor has no need for such things. In the 50th we saw what looked like a rocket launcher and laser guns. Of course theres the moment. Is that all there is? Certainly their army has more than rockets and lasers
It's what always happened. It's written in such a way that it's a reveal, not a retcon. It's always happened that way but memory loss and the aftermath led the Doctor (and whoever else would've looked into it) into thinking it happened the old way.
Huh. So then I'm confused by what happened in Name of the Doctor. When they were in the timeline, a phsyical representative of the War Doctor appeared, not from the Doctor's memories, but from the actual timeline. I thought this meant that the Hurt Doctor indeed did do it.
Huh. So then I'm confused by what happened in Name of the Doctor. When they were in the timeline, a phsyical representative of the War Doctor appeared, not from the Doctor's memories, but from the actual timeline. I thought this meant that the Hurt Doctor indeed did do it.
They implied something about the other Doctors forgetting what they had changed in Day of the Doctor... specifically mentioning that Hurt would think he did detonate the moment, I believe.
He believes he did. The memory of what actually happened didn't resurface until the most recent Doctor (Smith) completed his role in it. The other Doctors (Hurt and Tennant) forgot what happened as soon as they returned to their own times. All that Hurt would remember would be standing over the button, ready to press it, and then later being in his TARDIS, regenerated into Eccleston, with Gallifrey gone.
Huh. So then I'm confused by what happened in Name of the Doctor. When they were in the timeline, a phsyical representative of the War Doctor appeared, not from the Doctor's memories, but from the actual timeline. I thought this meant that the Hurt Doctor indeed did do it.
I get that, but Hurt already regenerated into Eccleston by the time he forgot what happened. Which means that at no point physically during his War Doctor form did he think he pushed the button.
Right, but all I am saying is that it is weird that he is afraid of permanent death when he knows that it is not possible due to future incarnations visiting him. I expect them to explain how he is able to regenerate and how the timestream and such is there in The Name of the Doctor, but I have my doubts they will explain that fear. But who knows, Moffat can certainly still surprise us.
Timey wimey.
(stop questioning!)
"I have no idea where he gets that from."
lol fine. Moffat pulls out too many plot twists for his own good.
It's not explicitly stated. I think however that John Hurt being regretful in the Doctor's timestream in Name of the Doctor points to they changed history.
I get that, but Hurt already regenerated into Eccleston by the time he forgot what happened. Which means that at no point physically during his War Doctor form did he think he pushed the button.
Five-ish Doctors Reboot is freaking hilarious. Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy and Peter Davison had great chemistry together.
It is interesting that the character will be able to evolve from this point. The post-War "guilt Doctor" era is well and over.So I watched it twice. And I loved it both times. This is amazing.
I love the time travel stuff. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside. The Doctor has chosen to change or tweak the past multiple times and isn't that what time travel is all about? To go back and correct a mistake you've one?
The amazing bit is that the implication is that the Doctor never did actually destroy Gallifray. He's been living with the guilt for four centuries. A great, grand sacrifice the Doctor does for the universe and to keep his promise.
Then of course wonderful way in which centuries worth of calculations are started by earlier doctors and completed by the later ones.
Amazing. An absolute joy to watch and it's great to see that the Doctor has been redeemed of the guilt in his past.
It is interesting that the character will be able to evolve from this point. The post-War "guilt Doctor" era is well and over.
Trenzalore is an interesting plot thread for the future anyway. That and Gallifrey. I think in some way they've resolved the Time War (though it will probably be a sandbox for Big Finish writers), so they need to add new something new to the lore at this point.We've had 3 guilty doctors. 11 has slightly replaced his guilt with the dread of Trenzalore but that means that since Trenzalore is the 'Fall of the Eleventh' and since the 'Eleventh' has sort of realized that Gallifray hasn't fallen it could mean that 'Twelve' will have a clean slate to work on. No guilt. No Silence. No Trenzalore.
A proper rebirth. Woo!
Then of course wonderful way in which centuries worth of calculations are started by earlier doctors and completed by the later ones.
Well, (small Christmas Special spoilers/rumors from GB)
The Doctor fully expects to die on Trenzalore, permanently.
Which doesn't seem to make sense, given what we were shown in the 50th. I have no doubt that the extra regenerations will be a mystery, but the fact that he knows he has a future makes it weird.
Right, but all I am saying is that it is weird that he is afraid of permanent death when he knows that it is not possible due to future incarnations visiting him. I expect them to explain how he is able to regenerate and how the timestream and such is there in The Name of the Doctor, but I have my doubts they will explain that fear. But who knows, Moffat can certainly still surprise us.
Its such a shame that Ecclestone did not appear for his regeneration![]()
Most interesting note to come from yesterdays #DoctorWho panel at Excel was that a longer version of the Day of the Doctor regeneration
was made but Moffat chose not to use it because, he implied, he was not 100% happy with the SFX. Would love to see it though #DoctorWho
@KeefJudge The longer version used CGI but Moffat wasnt satisfied
To clarify - CG was used beyond the yellow lights. The special effects guys were surprised to see how much was cut in the final edit
A lot of people (and I mean a lot) seem to be certain on the fact it was Capaldi who said "No, sir, all thirteen..." when the Doctors were giving that little speech at the end, and not the High Councilor.