• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2015-2016 |OT3| If someone named PhoenixDark leaves your party, call the cops

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cheebo

Banned
My head wants to explode whenever I hear this (which is frighteningly often).
I thought you said you wouldn't vote Hillary if she beats Bernie just a few months back? I am glad this is no longer the case because we need every vote to stop the GOp but I am curious, what changed?
 

FiggyCal

Banned
I don't hate Hillary. Honestly, if not for Sanders I'd probably have voted for her. The juxtaposition doesn't help. I liked Dean but still voted for Kerry. In '08, I'd have voted for Clinton of she'd have beaten Obama. This year...I just can't do it.

What changed this year? I mean if Sanders loses the nomination?
 
The problem has never been Bernie, it's been his supporters who have taken his campaign as a socio-political panacea. It's easy to just get behind the "it" presidential candidate every 8 years and complain that your opponents have single handedly stifled the revolution; it's much harder to actually do the work necessary to change society at a local and state level.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Also a new Cant Stump The Trump 11 mixtape got released, hit the streets just recently

odPk1ja.jpg


Everyone loves those, the more horns you got in your video = better.

The Star Wars shit at the end went a tad too long, but still good!

It's amazing the creator has seemingly learned nothing about audio equalizing after making so many videos.
 
The problem has never been Bernie, it's been his supporters who have taken his campaign as a socio-political panacea. It's easy to just get behind the "it" presidential candidate every 8 years and complain that your opponents have single handedly stifled the revolution; it's much harder to actually do the work necessary to change society at a local and state level.

Amen.

I'm also going to start drinking now. That other thread did my head in.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
I don't hate Hillary. Honestly, if not for Sanders I'd probably have voted for her. The juxtaposition doesn't help. I liked Dean but still voted for Kerry. In '08, I'd have voted for Clinton of she'd have beaten Obama. This year...I just can't do it.

what changed all of a sudden? Couple months ago you were frothing at Cheebo and I for the mere thought of supporting hillary:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1073924

We're already tucked, between Hillary and a Republican candidate we're merely negotiating over lubricant.

I'm getting really tired of having my act of exercising my vote as I see fit as something 'selfish'. I have Russ' back for sure, but Hillary? I don't think I can do it. I don't dislike her, I simply don't think she'll do what needs to be done.
.

I don't drink often, but I've already procured a bottle of port for March 1st.

I thought you were taking the day or week off?
 
Has anyone else noticed that the age group that is #FeelingTheBern has been expanding, at an exponential rate (that WSJ poll had to reference those 50+)? It probably won't be long before it's the average age of Fox News viewers (68+) ;).

When I see women all around me, at our local Bernie storefront (we had a guy in an expensive looking Merc make a $20+ donation to our store fund :) ), it amuses me when you guys do your very best to try and show that women just can't help but support Hillary (just don't mention lads, that the majority (not Adam's family ;) ) of the nurses of the National Nurses United union, who are 90% women, endorsed Bernie).
 

HylianTom

Banned
I thought you were taking the day or week off?
I already have that Tuesday and Wednesday off.

I'm letting my vacation time build-up for later in the year (a few days off for E3, a week off for Zelda and/or NX, a week off for Election Day, the days after every GE debate, the days after major convention speeches, some travel time to work the campaign in Florida, etc).
 

ivysaur12

Banned
Oh man:

HOLLIS, N.H. (AP) — After months of predicting a comeback for their preferred candidates, Republican establishment leaders now concede the first two contests of the presidential race, in Iowa and New Hampshire early next month, are Donald Trump's and Ted Cruz's to lose.

That leaves many GOP traditionalists, who fear each candidate would be a disaster in the November general election, pinning their White House hopes on a feat no Republican has pulled off in modern political history: securing the nomination without winning at least one of the first two states on the calendar.

It's a risky strategy at best, and party officials are hoping that weaker candidates will drop out before the South Carolina primary that follows New Hampshire, allowing voters to more easily coalesce behind an alternative to the billionaire real estate mogul and the Texas senator.

"I don't know how they can convince themselves that they'll be able to go into South Carolina and get something going, having come in a distant third, fourth, fifth place in Iowa and New Hampshire," said Mike Dennehy, a New Hampshire Republican operative. "Especially when you will have two candidates who have been very strong."

Trump and Cruz are atop the field in Iowa, where voters caucus Feb. 1. Preference polls find Trump with a commanding lead in New Hampshire, which votes Feb. 9, and Cruz in the mix for second place.

The nine others in Republicans race are fighting to emerge from the pack; there's little sign anyone will drop out before voting begins.

Among them are Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Ohio Gov. John Kasich. Each is competing for the same pool of center-right voters.

Allies of Bush and Kasich in New Hampshire have been trading phone calls in recent weeks, trying to gauge each other's thinking about staying in the race. Campaign officials say they have felt no direct pressure from party leaders to drop out before the first two contests.

But there's open discussion about the need for some of the more conventional candidates to drop out after New Hampshire votes on Feb. 9.

"We shouldn't have a whole lotta folks running," said Henry Barbour, a Republican national committeeman from Mississippi. "The ones who don't do well need to get out of the stinkin' race."

Voters, too, appear increasingly ready for the field to narrow.

"Normally by now a bunch of people would have dropped out," said Milt Janosky, a 74-year-old retiree at a Bush town hall in his hometown of Hollis, New Hampshire.

Karen Whitham, a 72-year-old from West Des Moines, Iowa, said of the field: "Some of them should just drop out. Some of them don't have a chance and they know it."

The risk for the more mainstream candidates is that Trump or Cruz generates momentum in the first two states, and it's too strong to stop as the race turns to South Carolina and beyond. Since 1976, every major party presidential nominee has won either Iowa or New Hampshire, with the exception of Democrat Bill Clinton in 1992.

To be sure, large numbers of voters in Iowa and New Hampshire say they're still undecided, and previous contests in both states have swung in unexpected directions just days before the caucuses and primary.

"People in the states make their decisions very late," Rubio said during a swing through Iowa on Saturday. "They take very seriously their vote."

For all the talk of some late tumult in Republican field, the 2016 race has remained surprisingly consistent, with Cruz proving to be the first real threat to Trump's lead in months.

In a sign of their increasing separation from the rest of the field, Trump and Cruz have spent the past week focused on tearing each other down, ending the de facto alliance they had maintained to this point in the race.

Trump has suggested the Canadian-born Cruz isn't eligible to run for president, and has accused the senator of being a "great hypocrite" for not disclosing loans he took from big Wall Street banks to help fund his 2012 Senate campaign. Cruz has responded by questioning Trump's "New York values" — a coded suggestion that Trump is too liberal to be a Republican.

Trying to stay close behind, Rubio jabbed Trump and Cruz repeatedly as he campaigned across Iowa this past weekend, warning voters they "can't just elect any Republican."

"Being angry about the direction of our country by itself will not be enough," Rubio said, referencing the conservative anger fueling Trump and Cruz' candidacies. In last week's debate, Trump declared that he "gladly" accepted "the mantle of anger."

Trump's strength was a constant theme during Bush's town hall in Hollis on Friday. Several questioners wondered how an experienced politician can compete in an election dominated by anger with those who have held elected office. "The numbers right now aren't lying and we don't have a lot of time left," one voter said.

"He's a talent, he understands why people are angry," said Bush, one of the few candidates taking on Trump in recent weeks. But there was little he could promise the questioner about his ability to block Trump's path to the nomination.

"It's way above my pay grade to figure out how this plays out," he said.
 
It's amazing how incoherent and technical Rubio made Cruz's tax plan considering how long he's had to prepare for this.

Simple diss: "Cruz says his tax plan isn't a VAT, but Japan has the exact tax system Ted proposes and you know what the Japanese call it: A VAT! When politicians aren't running for office, they tend to tell the truth a bit more so I trust Japan's judgment more than Cruz's in this case. A VAT is basically a sales tax. So, if you're on fixed income, Cruz is going to make $100 worth of groceries cost $119 for you, just so he can cut the taxes of his wife's friends at Goldman Sachs."
 

Bowdz

Member
Also a new Cant Stump The Trump 11 mixtape got released, hit the streets just recently

odPk1ja.jpg


Everyone loves those, the more horns you got in your video = better.

The Star Wars shit at the end went a tad too long, but still good!

I always lose it at The Rains of Castamere.

I would love to here PoliGAF's predictions on this: will Trump's attacks be enough to take down Cruz? Will Trump beat Cruz in Iowa?
 

Sianos

Member
this post needs more attention:


trump is getting republicans to show their true color

eta for the next thread about how republicans don't actually support anything the republican frontrunners are saying and how it is offensive to suggest that republicans might have views similar to their candidates of choice?

it seems that they exist in a superpositional state between knowing and not knowing what their candidates believe and support
 
The NYTimes reporter actually retracted that statement:

CORREX: Trump was talking about Ike's mass deportation program, not FDR's internment camps

Uhh, still not good, but entirely consistent with what he's said before and not another step beyond the pale.
 

Mario

Sidhe / PikPok
it seems that they exist in a superpositional state between knowing and not knowing what their candidates believe and support

That Republican cat is going to be dead when the box is opened this November.

Time to start looking for a new cat, Republicans.
 

East Lake

Member
The problem has never been Bernie, it's been his supporters who have taken his campaign as a socio-political panacea. It's easy to just get behind the "it" presidential candidate every 8 years and complain that your opponents have single handedly stifled the revolution; it's much harder to actually do the work necessary to change society at a local and state level.
Who do you think is responsible for top down political thinking?
 

Sianos

Member
The NYTimes reporter actually retracted that statement:

Uhh, still not good, but entirely consistent with what he's said before and not another step beyond the pale.

even now, they love that plausible deniability, don't they

my ability to provide charity to their answers is rapidly diminishing more and more, especially after "ban all people [who look] muslim from entering the nation" has gone from being the most absurd parody of a republican statement you could suggest to the genuine policy suggestion that solidified the republican frontrunner's lead

and they STILL say that republicans are being misrepresented - because they only want a "temporary" ban (indefinitely, until further notice)

That Republican cat is going to be dead when the box is opened this November.

Time to start looking for a new cat, Republicans.

so that's what cnn means whenever they say the race is "dead heat"

it means the cat has been dead for months, but no one has had the guts to check
 
this post needs more attention:



trump is getting republicans to show their true color

eta for the next thread about how republicans don't actually support anything the republican frontrunners are saying and how it is offensive to suggest that republicans might have views similar to their candidates of choice?

it seems that they exist in a superpositional state between knowing and not knowing what their candidates believe and support
Trump supporters be like

"I like Trump because he isn't subject to any political pressures! He says what's on his mind and tells it like it is!"

Then you're all

"Well what about his discriminatory, borderline fascist policies or statements regarding Muslims, Mexicans, blacks, Asians, women, Jews etc."

Thennnn it's all

"TRUMP DOESN'T SUPPORT THOSE THINGS HE'S JUST SAYING THAT TO GET ELECTED JEEZ PC POLICE OVER HERE"
 

Sianos

Member
Trump supporters be like

"I like Trump because he isn't subject to any political pressures! He says what's on his mind and tells it like it is!"

Then you're all

"Well what about his discriminatory, borderline fascist policies or statements regarding Muslims, Mexicans, blacks, Asians, women, Jews etc."

Thennnn it's all

"TRUMP DOESN'T SUPPORT THOSE THINGS HE'S JUST SAYING THAT TO GET ELECTED JEEZ PC POLICE OVER HERE"

what happens if we complete the circuit and innocently tell them that having to supposedly "pretend" to support racism to get elected [read: actually be racist] is the absolute strongest and most relevant "political pressure" there is in the republican party and by extension america these days?...
 
Who do you think is responsible for top down political thinking?

Politics doesn't start at the top, it grows from the bottom up. The Tea Party is your classic (modern) example. Local grassroots effort from ordinary people across the country, affecting drastic change all the way from city councils to state governorships.

If people want socialism in America then they need to start with their neighborhood, not the Presidency. That's how Bernie got started after all, but you don't see that getting replicated because it's not easy or fulfilling work. People want the easy sense of satisfaction that comes from casual support for a national campaign from a frontier candidate, you saw the same thing with Ron Paul.

It's easy to support someone nationally after other people have done the real work locally. Bernie doesn't need your help now, he's already made it. What he needs is people who act as committed to socialism as they claim, people who are willing to volunteer and fight to get their local Bernies elected (see Seattle electing Kshama Sawant to their city council).
 
Hey, in the OT there's yet another "I'd rather Trump than Hillary" Bernie-stan. You guys really need to reign these guys in if you want your guy taken seriously as running for leading the Democratic party.

It is impossible -- the persecution complex runs deep within them. Thats why Sanders should win the nomination, though. I think he can deflect a lot of voters from Trump. The fervor he (Trump) creates with his base is extremely scary and Dems should be worried about turnout with a tepid, intellectual candidate like Clinton.
 
It is impossible -- the persecution complex runs deep within them. Thats why Sanders should win the nomination, though. I think he can deflect a lot of voters from Trump. The fervor he (Trump) creates with his base is extremely scary and Dems should be worried about turnout with a tepid, intellectual candidate like Clinton.

You think Sanders should win the nomination because a small group of petulant children are going to hold their breath if they don't get their way?

Man, I tried that type of shit when I was 3 and it turned out about as well as you'd expect.

The "I'll go Trump if not for Bernie" people probably have never vote in their lives anyway. It's a net change of zero. Probably wouldn't even get out there for Bernie.
 
You think Sanders should win the nomination because a small group of petulant children are going to hold their breath if they don't get their way?

Man, I tried that type of shit when I was 3 and it turned out about as well as you'd expect.

The "I'll go Trump if not for Bernie" people probably have never vote in their lives anyway. It's a net change of zero. Probably wouldn't even get out there for Bernie.

To be fair, failing to appease them to some some degree did have a hand in ensuring 8 years of W., so they shouldnt be completely disregarded.

To be extra-fair, i do think that hills might as well not bother, since she has such unusual proeminence that their opinions about her are most likely set in stone. Local races tho.

Thus the importance of having a party working locally to teach people the sad realities of the US political process and foment participation and stuff
 

Makai

Member
I don't see "New York values" as antisemetic. Donald Trump is a New Yorker and he's specifically criticizing him. "Coastal cities" also would not have played well in Charleston.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
I don't see "New York values" as antisemetic. Donald Trump is a New Yorker and he's specifically criticizing him. "Coastal cities" also would not have played well in Charleston.

He may not have meant it as antisemetic, but it's been used that way a lot in the past.
 

So, I read it. It's a hell of a lot better than his 2013 give it to the state's plan, that's for sure. It's not going to go anywhere, because the tax rake heights would be DOA.

However, I'm confused....

So, all of this is at 0 out of pocket costs to everyone? Even with Medicare, seniors are still responsible for 20%. So, that's going to go away and everyone gets everything they need for free? How will that work with reimbursements, then. Everything will only be paid at the Medicare approved amount, and doctors have to accept that...or just not see any patients. Hospitals too, I guess. That seems a little unrealistic, but I guess that's just the way it is.
 

East Lake

Member
Politics doesn't start at the top, it grows from the bottom up. The Tea Party is your classic (modern) example. Local grassroots effort from ordinary people across the country, affecting drastic change all the way from city councils to state governorships.

If people want socialism in America then they need to start with their neighborhood, not the Presidency. That's how Bernie got started after all, but you don't see that getting replicated because it's not easy or fulfilling work. People want the easy sense of satisfaction that comes from casual support for a national campaign from a frontier candidate, you saw the same thing with Ron Paul.

It's easy to support someone nationally after other people have done the real work locally. Bernie doesn't need your help now, he's already made it. What he needs is people who act as committed to socialism as they claim, people who are willing to volunteer and fight to get their local Bernies elected (see Seattle electing Kshama Sawant to their city council).
I'm not seeing the connections tbh. Are you saying socialists are inherently lazy and the tea party isn't? I'd also think it would be better to compare the sctructure of the tea party first (funding/organization) before claiming Bernie supporters don't understand X about politics.
 

Holmes

Member
It's weird how Bernie kept saying his plan is his 2013 bill, but then his campaign releases this. I know it's illegal to coordinate with your SuperPAC but it's not illegal to coordinate with your own campaign.
 
I thought you said you wouldn't vote Hillary if she beats Bernie just a few months back? I am glad this is no longer the case because we need every vote to stop the GOp but I am curious, what changed?
No, I won't vote for Hillary. My head explodes because the difference between Sanders and Trump is so large that having either one as a second candidate behind the other is crazypants.

If Hillary is the nominee, I'll vote for Jill Stein.
 
hillary has -a lot- of workable policies. But people don't want incremental change when they vote. They want to change the world.
It's difficult to be enthusiastic about this dispassionate establishment figurehead, despite how realistic and sound a choice on paper she is..she probably wont do a damn thing about the national spyware agency either
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom