*gasp*
Cruz won't take slander like that sitting down.
No, he's going to smile and clap.
*gasp*
Cruz won't take slander like that sitting down.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...with-ted-cruz-and-says-donald-trump-would-do-NEWS - in interview, Bob Dole warns of "cataclysmic" losses for the GOP under Cruz as nominee
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...with-ted-cruz-and-says-donald-trump-would-do-
someone should give Cruz a hug
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...with-ted-cruz-and-says-donald-trump-would-do-
someone should give Cruz a hug
LOL I love how we've gotten to a point where people seem to forget that TRUMP IS A THING
I think his colleagues genuinely hate him more than Obama. Even the GOP wanted autographs and pictures with him after the SOTU addressEveryone hates Cruz more than Trump.
Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538 2m2 minutes ago
IMO, GOP party elites are wrong here, but fact they think like this makes me way less skeptical of Trump's chances.
http://nyti.ms/1JYBg5q
I've been wondering. Are the primary threads going to be largely about the primaries themselves and reporting on the numbers as they roll in, or are they going to include general explanations for the primary systems?
Today I saw a Norwegian post NH numbers favoring Bernie as if they meant something, so I figure that people probably need an explanation of why certain states favor XYZ candidate, the value of XYZ state in the primary, the demographics, the history, and so on.
I've been wondering. Are the primary threads going to be largely about the primaries themselves and reporting on the numbers as they roll in, or are they going to include general explanations for the primary systems?
Today I saw a Norwegian post NH numbers favoring Bernie as if they meant something, so I figure that people probably need an explanation of why certain states favor XYZ candidate, the value of XYZ state in the primary, the demographics, the history, and so on.
I think his colleagues genuinely hate him more than Obama. Even the GOP wanted autographs and pictures with him after the SOTU address
Predictit is completely irrational. These odds are contradictory
https://www.predictit.org/Contract/...be-filed-against-Hillary-Clinton-in-2016#data
https://www.predictit.org/Contract/...on-win-the-2016-US-presidential-election#data
That's good.
I'm just in favor of educating our European brethren to our silly political wonkery
People like Cruz usually have atleast a few cronies, doesnt even have that.
i mean damn even Villains had a few homies
It's times like this I really miss having an Andrew Sullivan rant or two on Palin and the GOP to read. I really wish he'd start the Dish back up again.
I even whipped this up and emailed it to him, which is obviously just the thing he needs to return to blogging.
I think you're a little thirsty.I almost feel bad for Kelli Prather who is running for Senator against Strickland. But then she calls the ACA "world renowned initiative" and I'm like....naw. Sorry girl.
And Sittenfeld is kinda cute. He's good on the issues that are important to me. Plus, when he gets is whiteboard out it's adorkable.....but, gotta stick with my boy Strickland.
Edit: actually, I might see if I can volunteer for Sittenfeld until the primary is over. Not being thirsty, but I could get in on the groundfloor of that for a future race. Dude's smart and charismatic enough.
Everyone hates Cruz more than Trump.
I think you're a little thirsty.
Desperately need an updated Iowa poll.
Are you me? I miss his blog so much. Going through this election year without Stewart or Sullivan is torture.
Tuesday night offered a classic study of the liberal media and what draws their attention as the big three networks of ABC, CBS, and NBC all censored from their evening newscasts any mention of a massive development in the Hillary Clinton e-mail scandal in favor of ten minutes and 31 seconds of coverage across five segments on Sarah Palins endorsement of Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential race.
In contrast, FNCs Special Report led with this story (before going to the campaign trail) with chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge highlighting how Clinton received material on her private, unsecured e-mail server that contained some of the countrys most secretive and highly classified organization operations.
Naturally, the networks saw no interest in even mentioning it to their viewers in their coverage of the 2016 campaign. As this writer noted above, the networks reserved a whopping five segments (one on ABC, one on CBS, and three on NBC) for the Iowa rally in which the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee endorsed the billionaire frontrunner.
Leaving even that aside, all three networks spent a separate three minutes and 46 seconds across two reports and one news brief on the Democratic race but did not use that opportunity to even once allude to the cloud surrounding the former secretary of state (as socialist Senator Bernie Sanders opened up a 27-point lead against her in a new poll from New Hampshire).
As the race goes forward and more developments break concerning either the Clinton e-mail server or Clinton Foundation scandals, it will be worth watching to see if the networks flock to the latest happenings concerning Trump as an excuse for not covering these scandals. Based on recent history, theres no reason to doubt that this will not be the case.
Let's be real here: if there were something that could potentially damaged her beyond repair she wouldn't have run.Conservatives mad that no one cares about Clinton's emails.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2016/01/19/networks-censor-massive-hillary-e-mail-bombshell-spend-over-10
Conservatives mad that no one cares about Clinton's emails.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2016/01/19/networks-censor-massive-hillary-e-mail-bombshell-spend-over-10
...He's married...and it looks happily, unfortunately. But, you never know. What happens in the voting booth stays in the voting booth, amirite?
Even if he were to somehow not get the nomination, Trump has run some amazing interference for the Clintons.Conservatives mad that no one cares about Clinton's emails.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2016/01/19/networks-censor-massive-hillary-e-mail-bombshell-spend-over-10
I honestly think that Obama and Biden know that there's no "there" there, which is why Biden didn't jump in.Let's be real here: if there were something that could potentially damaged her beyond repair she wouldn't have run.
...
You can't have all the lookers Adam. You have Herman, Harbaugh , O'Malley, Chaffee..
You need to pick one or two or stick with them friend.
Anyway.. The Bernie/PP comments.. Another optics issue .. He keeps making gaffes that show his greenness again.
Does this hurt him in Iowa somehow or even New Hampshire even a little?
Conservatives mad that no one cares about Clinton's emails.]
I can't
Even if he were to somehow not get the nomination, Trump has run some amazing interference for the Clintons.
Overshadowing the email drama, displacing coverage that Bernie would've likely gotten.. should she win the general, she really needs to thank him publicly. He's been a perfect storm that has breached both political hemispheres.
I honestly think that Obama and Biden know that there's no "there" there, which is why Biden didn't jump in.
You know on a side note I often forget that the FBI is under the control of Loretta Lynch, technically. considering the FBI usually operates like its a separate federal agency.The FBI recommends but its up to the Justice Department to prosecute. Obama's not going to do that his likely successor especially when he believes she did nothing deserving of it.
Well, I think Hillary is taking the PP endorsement in Iowa next week sometime. Maybe I made that up. I'd be shocked if they didn't hit him with it there. I think that it would hurt him among undecideds in Iowa, specifically among women. Remember, the movement hasn't been from Hillary to Bernie, but from Hillary to "I'ma take another look."
New Hampshire, I don't even care about. I'd redeploy the people from NH to Iowa. I mean, you can't do that optically, but really...just keep it close enough in NH. I just want that win in Iowa, then we're golden.
But, let me just say this, a win in Iowa isn't a deathblow to Hillary. It just means we'll have to deal with the primary a little longer than I thought we would have.
The FBI recommends but its up to the Justice Department to prosecute. Obama's not going to do that his likely successor especially when he believes she did nothing deserving of it.
Agreed. If she can steal Iowa.. Would it be fair to say it's over?
Oh.. Amazing.
Agreed. If she can steal Iowa.. Would it be fair to say it's over?
Speaking of which, conservatives love comparing it to what happened with Petraeus. But he never got any criminal indictments either, he just resigned. It would be crazy to criminally prosecute Hillary if they didn't do so for Patraeus.
Agreed. If she can steal Iowa.. Would it be fair to say it's over?
1. Rubio loses in Iowa and NH while polling 4th in SC.
2. ???
3. Rubio wins South Carolina!