She literally said "I represented Wall Street." Granted the following part was "as the senator from New York" but it was still such a puzzling thing to say out loud. Followed by her puzzling "I told them hey guys, cut it out" lol.
Does anything think Obama wouldn't have pounced on that? Sanders had little to say, barely took any direct shots at her, and overall just seemed passive. Folks should go back and watch those 2008 debates...that's how you take down a favored opponent.
Honestly Obama would have attacked her on the emails too. Not directly in terms of getting into the nitty gritty of the bullshit, but just a simple "you know, this is something the American people are tired of. The same politicians embroiled in the same media stories over and over while nothing gets done in Washington..."
The only way that could make an effective attack ad for Republicans is if Trump wins the nomination.I pretty much called it the moment she said that at the debate OT. It's going to be a nice GOP attack ad for sure. The fuq was she thinking? Yeah Sanders went light on her on both where he should and where he shouldn't have.
Exactly my thoughts as well. Republicans attack democrats for being anti-capitalist. For not supporting businesses enough and thus harming the economy. Like you said, other than Trump.The only way that could make an effective attack ad for Republicans is if Trump wins the nomination.
Do you really expect someone like Rubio or Bush to call out Clinton for being lax on regulating Wall Street when they're very much in favor of loose regulation of the financial sector?
As a special bonus video, here is Jeb movingly recalling the names of the Columbia astronauts, and clearly not tripping over Kalpana Chawla because hes seeing the mission specialists name for the first time ever:
Its quite the honor first Indian-American astronaut, first Indian woman in space, and the first of two videotaped Columbia-related flubs by the Smarter Bush Brother.
Eh. I trip up over names all the time that aren't familiar to me.
Eh. I trip up over names all the time that aren't familiar to me.
Pretty good piece from Politico this morning on the current state of the Rubio campaign.
Dude has a pretty steep hill to climb if he wants the nomination.
Sounds like he needs an organizational shakeup. Even if he starts getting a lot of money from donors fleeing Bush, the infrastructure of his campaign seems pretty unsound.
Well I mean, sure everyone does. But he isn't a school teacher calling attendance on the first day of class.. These people are dead and he's laughingEh. I trip up over names all the time that aren't familiar to me.
The only way that could make an effective attack ad for Republicans is if Trump wins the nomination.
Do you really expect someone like Rubio or Bush to call out Clinton for being lax on regulating Wall Street when they're very much in favor of loose regulation of the financial sector?
Wouldn't a party registering voters at candidate rallies sound like...communism? I don't know, it just sounds very top down. In my opinion, if a candidate wants the job, they should drive the voters and not rely on the party for doing that.
The only way that could make an effective attack ad for Republicans is if Trump wins the nomination.
Do you really expect someone like Rubio or Bush to call out Clinton for being lax on regulating Wall Street when they're very much in favor of loose regulation of the financial sector?
Pretty good piece from Politico this morning on the current state of the Rubio campaign.
Dude has a pretty steep hill to climb if he wants the nomination.
Sounds like he needs an organizational shakeup. Even if he starts getting a lot of money from donors fleeing Bush, the infrastructure of his campaign seems pretty unsound.
Oh, governor. That makes sense. I don't feel bad for him anymore. He can stay relevant for another year.I think Rubio was campaigning for VP or national attention for the 2018 Florida Governor's seat and being christened as the establishment's last hope caught him off guard.
I think Rubio was campaigning for VP or national attention for the 2018 Florida Governor's seat and being christened as the establishment's last hope caught him off guard.
You'd think that given the amount of people fired up for Trump they'd go out of their way to give him money Bernie/Obama small donor style. Or is actively preventing people from giving him money?
Pretty good piece from Politico this morning on the current state of the Rubio campaign.
Dude has a pretty steep hill to climb if he wants the nomination.
Sounds like he needs an organizational shakeup. Even if he starts getting a lot of money from donors fleeing Bush, the infrastructure of his campaign seems pretty unsound.
They are. Average donation for Trump is $50. He's refusing PAC donations, I guess. Not sure how that works.You'd think that given the amount of people fired up for Trump they'd go out of their way to give him money Bernie/Obama small donor style. Or is actively preventing people from giving him money?
Mr. Trump revealed in a filing Thursday to the Federal Election Commission that the vast majority of the money he raised and spent this summer as he rose to the top of national polls came not from his own coffers, as it had in the spring, but from about $3.7 million in what he called “unsolicited contributions.” Some 74,000 donors pitched in an average of about $50 to help his campaign, he reported.
I think Rubio was campaigning for VP or national attention for the 2018 Florida Governor's seat and being christened as the establishment's last hope caught him off guard.
the atlantic said:If the Democrats wont take seriously a candidate with a viable, credible, and professionally managed campaign just because it includes a promise to step aside once the work is done, then fine. You win. I drop that promise.
I am running for president. I am running with the purpose of restoring this democracy. I will make that objective primary. I will do everything possible to make it happen first, by working with Congress to pass fundamental reform first.
After we pass that reform, I will remain as president to make sure the reforms stick. I will work with Congress to assure they are implemented. I will defend them against legislative or legal attack.
But beyond that priority, I would do everything else a president must do, too. Which means I bear the burden in this campaign of convincing America I could do that well. Like every other candidate, I will outline my position on the policies that I would press, once reform is achieved. In every relevant way, my campaign will be like every other campaignexcept mine will place democracy first.
Okay, I feel fine with Hillary as the next president, but I do have to say that some of the things she said during the debate really irritated me.
Lie about Snowden.
Lie about prior position on TPP.
Ridiculous claim about how we need more marijuana studies.
Defending U.S. intervention into Libya.
These things will probably help her in the general and she'll never be attacked for these things because we (the left) don't want to eat our own and these are statements that the right largely likes.... But it was still irritating to watch.
I don't see why she's playing it safe with marijuana. If anything, saying you're for legalization could help with turnout among young voters.
Lawrence Lessig announces that he won't resign after all.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/referendum-presidency-larry-lessig/411013/
This is, actually, a little better than the original magical president theory, although Lessig is still basically the Donald Trump of the Democratic party.
It wont be the candidate calling her out. It'll be the SuperPACs. Over and over again.
You think they care? Lol...it's an attack ad....hypocrisy and double-standards are in the cards. Not to mention, attack ads are usually full of deceptive, out of context information that preys on low information voters. Clinton has the Wall Street stigma. They could care less about the overwhelming number of voters that will be unmoved....they care about the ones that will ONLY.
There is no moral compass to attack ads.
Like if you agree
Way to deflect. Never forget Vince FosterHe's thinking of Laura Bush.
Jeb Bush campaign makes $7.8 million ad buy for Janurary and February.
It's going to be a really long time before the field shrinks significantly, isn't it?
A number of people will be disqualified from the Undercard debate for polling below 1%. Probably time for them to wrap it up.Jeb Bush campaign makes $7.8 million ad buy for Janurary and February.
It's going to be a really long time before the field shrinks significantly, isn't it?
Anyone have link to the next question from the black dude?
I'm just thankful that Jeb's going to be around for a while, eating into Rubio's efforts. If this is a marathon that Rubio is trying to win, Jeb is the set of ten-pound ankle weights that's slowing him down.Jeb Bush campaign makes $7.8 million ad buy for Janurary and February.
It's going to be a really long time before the field shrinks significantly, isn't it?
Jeb: "Did you remember your line?"No but I gotta say based on his bored behavior (and race) I can't help but think he's a planted questioner. My friend worked on Ron Paul's 2008 campaign and said every planted questioner they used would be bored as fuck since he or she had to stay at the rally the entire time, whereas actual supporters would be excited or awake regardless of age.
Like if you agree
Are you talking about the barracks bombing? That's different than the embassyI never mean it as a competition, but every time I see stuff like this I just link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_embassy_bombing
Where so many people died because Reagan told marines to not load their guns in known hostile territory. It's not even conspiracy. The order is documented, and Reagan's own administration said he was at fault.
and they never seem to post about Benghazi again.
Are you talking about the barracks bombing? That's different than the embassy
LMAO at Rubio's third quarter fundraising compared to Trumps. Rubio raised $5.7 million in the third quarter spending a significant portion of his time dedicated to fundraising while Trump raised $4 million without even trying. Come on Rubio, are you even trying?