Megaton?Ben Carson Profits From Ties With Convicted Felon, AP Report Finds
Making thread nowMegaton?
Support for Operation Wetback was enough crazy for months, let alone a single debate.
That will get any Super PAC GE ad going, no matter the nominee.
"Rubio supports Trump's deportation plan. The same one from the 1950s known as Operation: Wetback where thousands of Mexicans were deported in busses some likened to slave ships."
Etc.
As much as I hate Super PACs and such, it's time for the GOP to get a dose of their own medicine. The Super PACs should be nasty with regards to GOP immigration stances.
On a separate note, Rubio today claimed Ted Cruz supports his immigration plan which is bizarre since Ted Cruz most certainly does not agree with Rubio.
This is a terrible, weird endorsement ad for Vitter: https://youtu.be/DKr3Y1OXQ3k
I am really, really going to miss the diaper jokes, I have to admit. Someone on Twitter made a joke about how Vitter is going to be a pampered lobbyist once he's out of office, and I just about lost my shit here at work."You need to grow a better beard. Oh wait, bad babies who do boom boom in their diapies can't grow beards."
Ben Carson Profits From Ties With Convicted Felon, AP Report Finds
WASHINGTON Republican presidential contender Ben Carson has maintained a business relationship with a close friend convicted of defrauding insurance companies and testified on his behalf, even as the candidate has called for such crimes to be punished harshly.
Pittsburgh dentist Alfonso A. Costa pleaded guilty to a felony count of health care fraud after an FBI probe into his oral surgery practice found he had charged for procedures he never performed, according to court records.
Though the crime carries a potential sentence of up to 10 years in federal prison, Costa was able to avoid prison time after Carson helped petition a federal judge for leniency.
That's different from the position Carson took in 2013 as he prepared to launch his presidential campaign, saying those convicted of health care fraud should go to prison for at least a decade and be forced to forfeit "all of one's personal possessions."
At Costa's 2008 sentencing hearing, Carson described the dentist as "one my closest, if not my very closest friend."
"We became friends about a decade ago because we discovered that we were so much alike and shared the same values and principles that govern our lives," Carson told the judge, adding that their families vacationed together and that they were involved in "joint projects."
"Next to my wife of 32 years, there is no one on this planet that I trust more than Al Costa," Carson said.
After Costa pleaded guilty, 40 of his family members, friends and dental patients wrote letters to the judge as character witnesses. Carson was one of three people who also testified at Costa's 2008 sentencing hearing, stressing his friend's charitable works and vouching for his personal integrity. Also testifying on Costa's behalf was Jerome Bettis, a beloved former Pittsburgh Stealers running back who had helped bring home a Super Bowl trophy to the city two years earlier.
The government urged the judge to make an example of Costa.
"Reduction of a sentence based on good works by a wealthy person can create the appearance that a defendant's financial resources and prominent connections can skew the justice system in ways not available to persons of lesser means," a prosecutor told the judge.
In the end, Costa got no prison time. He was sentenced to one year of house arrest and 100 hours of community service, and ordered to pay more than $294,000 in fines and restitution. Costa later got 12 months shaved off his three-year probation.
I am really, really going to miss the diaper jokes, I have to admit. Someone on Twitter made a joke about how Vitter is going to be a pampered lobbyist once he's out of office, and I just about lost my shit here at work.
I am really, really going to miss the diaper jokes, I have to admit. Someone on Twitter made a joke about how Vitter is going to be a pampered lobbyist once he's out of office, and I just about lost my shit here at work.
For your scenario to be right, that Bernie is leading this massive revolution...every single data point everywhere has to be completely wrong. Not a little wrong, either. Entirely, completely, unequivocally, 100% wrong. Every single Democrat who has endorsed Hillary, from both wings of the party, has to be 100% wrong. Every single historical trend would have to be broken. I know you're using the word potential, but that's not the way it works. I have the potential to grow a third leg, but it's not going to happen. Bernie can't even get within 30 points of Hillary in a Southern State, yet he's going to beat her and then, magically, erase the Southern Strategy? Really?
There has been essentially zero movement of AA support towards Sanders. In his favorable/unfavorables, more AA people know about him....but they don't seem to be liking what they see.
Interesting article about Sander's Democrat problem
This is a good read. It also explains why Hillary does light years better among actual Democrats.
So, basically, all Sanders has to do is solve his minority problem, reverse the numbers when it comes to women, find a way to explain away (to the party he wants to lead) while it's no longer morally and intellectually bankrupt, hope Hillary implodes, and hope that everyone who has endorsed Hillary (including superdelegates) gets some type of amnesia before the election.
But in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary campaign, her championship of women did not translate into automatic support by women for her candidacy. Clinton barely won 50 percent of the women's vote in the Democratic primary fight against Barack Obama. She also did not receive unanimous support among women elected leaders, with several of her female Senate colleagues, such as Amy Klobuchar and Claire McCaskill, endorsing Obama.
Polling showed a generational divide where Hillary captured more older women voters while Obama captured the younger generation. Women in the middle split between the two. The younger woman voter didn't feel a sense of obligation to vote for the first "one of their own," but instead felt more passion for Obama's message of hope and his vision for the future.
Alasandro said:Oh he will get the black vote. I just happen to be African American and I can tell you that my interactions with other Black people regarding the next president has been Bernie all the way. Don't believe the hype. The media believes if it keeps telling people that Bernie isn't getting the black vote that black people won't vote for him. Now that some black leaders who are respected in the black community have come forward to support Bernie Sanders things are changing fast. Cornell West, Tavis Smiley, etc and if you believe that the majority of black people really trust or give a damn what people like Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton think I am happy to inform you that we don't.
Daniel B·;185214101 said:Bernie has no trouble, at all, attracting enthusiastic support from women, of all ages, based on my own observations of his ralies etc (did you see the photo from that recent poll; it featured 3 women and men), and as is self evident, from that video I posted from the South Carolina - Democratic Women's Council.
Also, if you look back at the 2008 primary, Hillary barely managed to convince 50% of women voters (source):
Hillary supporters try their best to reject the similarities between the current and 2008 primaries, but the parallels are sometimes uncanny, except this time, she can't say "[he's] not been in Washington enough. He needs to be stewed and seasoned a little more" and in addition, there is little doubt, in all quarters, that Bernie is 100% "the real deal" (essentially, not a "politician"), which is precisely the antedote we needed for Barack "TPP" Obama.
On Bernie's lack of support from American Americans, sure, he still has plenty of work to do, to get his message out there, but the following comment hopefully captures the trend:
Alasandro said:Oh he will get the black vote. I just happen to be African American and I can tell you that my interactions with other Black people regarding the next president has been Bernie all the way. Don't believe the hype. The media believes if it keeps telling people that Bernie isn't getting the black vote that black people won't vote for him. Now that some black leaders who are respected in the black community have come forward to support Bernie Sanders things are changing fast. Cornell West, Tavis Smiley, etc and if you believe that the majority of black people really trust or give a damn what people like Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton think I am happy to inform you that we don't.
Romney in a landslide! Have you seen the size of his crowds?Counterpoint. Both your argument about women and minorities I've bolded stem from anecdotal evidence, and therefore don't serve as actual arguments
That shit is a racket. 10% fee.Daniel B if you're so sure that Bernie is going to win why don't you buy some of his shares on the betting markets?
You'd get 6:1 odds which seems like a bargain for such a clear and obvious favorite who will win the women vote and the black vote and is the "antidote" for the sitting President who also happens to be the most beloved figure in the Democratic party.
That shit is a racket. 10% fee.
Daniel B·;185214101 said:based on my own observations of his rallies etc (did you see the photo from that recent poll; it featured 3 women and men)
Oh, you're a troll. That's less fun.
A+I know GAF is full of atheists, but no, Jesus was not a fraud.
Daniel B if you're so sure that Bernie is going to win why don't you buy some of his shares on the betting markets?
You'd get 6:1 odds which seems like a bargain for such a clear and obvious favorite who will win the women vote and the black vote and is the "antidote" for the sitting President who also happens to be the most beloved figure in the Democratic part
Daniel B·;185217149 said:Aren't you from the "Sanders has never had a chance" crowd, and if so, I would counter, have you put down a sizeable chunk on a virtually "guaranteed" double-figure percentage investment?
Daniel B·;185217149 said:I bet todays news on the Postal Workers will, or has already, moved those odds.
PerfectThat depends on his connections.
Because the return on that investment would be absolute shit. Clinton's odds are 1:10. Duh.
10% return in ~3 months time is actually pretty decent if you're feeling that confident. I can't think of many other investment opportunities that good.
10% fees. You'd make nothing.
Daniel B·;185219039 said:What was hilarious, was you guys were like "Quick, divert attention from that Postal Workers bombshell", with not a single comment .
That shit is a racket. 10% fee.
10% fees. You'd make nothing.
I'm going to vote for candidate X because of the Postal Workers endorsement - said nobody ever.
Daniel B·;185219039 said:What was hilarious, was you guys were like "Quick, divert attention from that Postal Workers bombshell", with not a single comment .
AFSCME – American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, representing 1.3 million
AFT – American Federation of Teachers, representing 1.6 million
BAC – International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, representing 76,233
IAM – International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, representing 570,423
ILA - International Longshoremen's Association, representing 65,000
IUOE - International Union of Operating Engineers, representing 374,521
IUPAT – International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, representing 103,858
NEA – National Education Association, representing 3 million
OPCMIA – Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, representing 39,000
UA – United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing, Pipefitting and Sprinkler Fitting Industry of the U.S. and Canada, representing 329,954
UBC – The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, representing 520,000
United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, representing 22,000
Because who the hell cares?Daniel B·;185219039 said:What was hilarious, was you guys were like "Quick, divert attention from that Postal Workers bombshell", with not a single comment .
These are Hillary's current union endorsements.
So.....Ya...no. IT's a fine get. I'm not salty he got it. It's going to change absolutely nothing. There aren't enough outstanding union endorsements to equal what Hillary already has. She has a majority...just like a majority of Democrats actually support her
I'm noticing a common theme in his avatar with another Bernie fan :UPD alt?
Daniel B·;185230400 said:O.k., v. good retort and I am reading and weeping... I need to investigate what's going on there, as Bernie is very much for unions.
Any comment on why Hillary didn't manage to convince a significant percentage of women, in the 08 primary, and why, if anything, Bernie won't do even better (given that she can't claim he's inexperienced, like with Obama etc)?
Of the 35 states and the District of Columbia where exit polling with demographic data was available in 2008, Clinton won the womens vote in 20 primaries but lost it in 16. When she lost, it was usually due to Obamas strength with African American women and young women. He also built a better grassroots base, outraising Clinton with 124,344 female donors to her 53,613. Where Clinton won hands down was amongst older white women, but Grounds recognized that there was plenty of headway to be made with black and young women in 2016.
Clinton has done a much better job showing her commitment to unions and has probably given them better reasons for them to support her. Her outreach campaign is probably better than Bernie's. Remember, endorsement deals, especially ones that concern unions, are very much backroom affairs.Daniel B·;185230400 said:O.k., v. good retort and I am reading and weeping... I need to investigate what's going on there, as Bernie is very much for unions.
Originally Posted by Alasandro said:Oh he will get the black vote. I just happen to be African American and I can tell you that my interactions with other Black people regarding the next president has been Bernie all the way. Don't believe the hype. The media believes if it keeps telling people that Bernie isn't getting the black vote that black people won't vote for him. Now that some black leaders who are respected in the black community have come forward to support Bernie Sanders things are changing fast. Cornell West, Tavis Smiley, etc and if you believe that the majority of black people really trust or give a damn what people like Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton think I am happy to inform you that we don't.
What is going on there is that they support Hillary over Bernie. I mean, I'm not trying to be an ass, but it's really that simple. They like her more than Bernie. They think she can win more than Bernie can. It really, really is that simple.
Hillary did win an overal majority in the popular vote in 2008. Obama won because his people were great at turning caucuses into huge delegate leads for him.
What's to investigate? They think she is better for unions, plain and simple. Not everyone sees Bernie the way you do.Daniel B·;185230400 said:O.k., v. good retort and I am reading and weeping... I need to investigate what's going on there, as Bernie is very much for unions.
Did anyone expect Hillary to be the nominee in 2016 back in 2009?