David Dope
Hah, bring on the attention.
Holy shit, just noticed he put Hogan there. *Forgot hulkamnia was revealed as a racist (on that leaked tape) last year.
I know. Hulkamnia was a lie.
But he killed gawker u know rite
David Dope
Hah, bring on the attention.
Holy shit, just noticed he put Hogan there. *Forgot hulkamnia was revealed as a racist (on that leaked tape) last year.
I know. Hulkamnia was a lie.
ABC/WaPo
LV CIinton +5
RV Clinton +10
(Josh Barro just retweeted this)
https://twitter.com/williamjordann/status/774815121185136640
Taniel ‏@Taniel 12m12 minutes ago
Trump's "outreach" to African-Americans leads to a dramatic jump among black respondents in WaPo/ABC poll: 2% in August to 3% now.
Taniel ‏@Taniel 17m17 minutes ago
ABC/WaPo: Clinton leads 51-43 in 2-way, 46-41-9-2 in 4-way.
She has 94% of Sanders supporters in former configuration, and 77% in latter.
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
And this was before Aleppogate. Ugh Johnson go away.
To be fair, what Gawker did was scummy, but Hogan is a racist piece of crap. That was a mess.But he killed gawker u know rite
Same here.I'll take it.
.....................................................................................
The claim that someone is "deplorable" is not something that can be fact-checked, because it's a matter of opinion, not fact. Pretending to defend the claim on an objective basis is nothing short of partisan hackery, despite BM's insistence that that would be "proper" journalism.
Seems like an odd statement. Isn't this literally the difference between RV and LV, meaning the +5 LV number already factors this in?
The second Democrats and/or Republicans widely embrace legalizing marijuana, the Libertarian party is toast. Pretty much everyone I know who claims to have libertarian ideals values that more than anything.
WE'RE TAKIN THE HOUSE.....................................................................................
But I thought we were all going to write in Bernie's name.Busted
.....................................................................................
I think you're right but I think the real result will be somewhere between the H2H and 4 way numbers. The margin will probably be closer to the H2H margins in the polls but still somewhere in between. I'm assuming most Sanders supporters saying they'll vote Clinton in the H2H but not for her in the 4-way will ultimately vote for her, but not all of them will.gonna go ahead and say that the election's gonna wind up being closer to the 2-ways than the 4-ways in these polls
stein's gonna fade to near zero and johnson's gonna be losing a percent or five
ABC/WaPo
LV CIinton +5
RV Clinton +10
(Josh Barro just retweeted this)
https://twitter.com/williamjordann/status/774815121185136640
Jay Cost ‏@JayCostTWS 14m14 minutes ago
But the Pepe stuff and all the other memes. I was inclined to dismiss it at first, but egads THEY KEEP DOING IT. And now Bannon.
I think you're right but I think the real result will be somewhere between the H2H and 4 way numbers. The margin will probably be closer to the H2H margins in the polls but still somewhere in between. I'm assuming most Sanders supporters saying they'll vote Clinton in the H2H but not for her in the 4-way will ultimately vote for her, but not all of them will.
Maybe. Or maybe not. I think my husband would be a good case study. He's voting for Clinton (rather, he's letting me fill in the bubble for her on his ballot) but he's not too hot on her. If he got surveyed he would probably say he's undecided or for Johnson in the 4-way (not Jill - he really doesn't like her). I assume there are more like him. They'll vote for her in the voting booth...but what's annoying for the Clinton campaign is that they probably can't count on these voters in the early vote period.I have a feeling the 4-way numbers will start looking more like the H2H numbers once we get the debates and people see that there really are only two choices.
To be fair, what Gawker did was scummy, but Hogan is a racist piece of crap. That was a mess.
Irredeemable isn't a word to be thrown around so easily.
They'll just ignore it until a better one comes out for them.the trump surrogate narrative lately has been about how terrible this month has been for Hillary and her campaign is desperate and failing. Then this poll...
Donald J. Trump Jr. re-posted this on Instagram.
It's a good poll, but again we have to take polls in bunches. This one has Obama approval at 58% when the aggregates have it around 54%. Not saying it's an outlier, but let's wait for a couple more respected polls to come out.the trump surrogate narrative lately has been about how terrible this month has been for Hillary and her campaign is desperate and failing. Then this poll...
Sounds like Nate and co have some methodological problems with the weighting in the ABC poll. Not to be a downer or anything.
Good.Good Nate or the crap one?
The second Democrats and/or Republicans widely embrace legalizing marijuana, the Libertarian party is toast. Pretty much everyone I know who claims to have libertarian ideals values that more than anything.
I dunno that "Why Sanders supporters cannot back Gary Johnson" thread is full of busters, lol.Hey, r/politics is now pro-Clinton/anti-Drumpf. That's nice. I guess that's what happens when you have 94% of Sanders supporters coming home.
Hey, r/politics is now pro-Clinton/anti-Trump. That's nice. I guess that's what happens when you have 94% of Sanders supporters coming home.
I think was definitely the year for her to do it but I guess they really thought it'd hurt her with suburban white voters maybe?I'm 70% certain that Hillary would take all of the liberal Gary Johnson supporters (and that makes up 3% of all voters right now) if she would just push for legalizing marijuana.
Anyway, this 120 line code I wrote today for a math simulation is the shittiest looking shit I've ever seen, but it works and I barely understand programming so this counts as a win for me.